Dataset Information

A case report of a patient with plasmacytoid urothelial cancer with significant response to HER2-targeting therapy and enfortumab vedotin.

ABSTRACT: In this case report, we present a patient with the rare plasmacytoid variant of urothelial cancer. Notable elements of his course include: complete response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin, development of metastatic disease to the rectum, sustained disease control with dual HER2 targeting therapy, and subsequent complete response to enfortumab vedotin. Plasmacytoid urothelial cancer accounts for just 1-3% of all urothelial cancer cases and is associated with more aggressive disease, with a propensity for intra-abdominal spread and poor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Preliminary data indicate that the variant may generally have high levels of HER2 expression. We review the history of HER2 targeting in metastatic urothelial cancer, which has included single-agent as well as combination with chemotherapy; there are ongoing biomarker-based clinical trials. Furthermore, we highlight the complete response to enfortumab vedotin. To date, this is the first report of efficacy for enfortumab vedotin in the plasmacytoid variant.

SUBMITTER: Sun M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8595081 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A case report of a patient with plasmacytoid urothelial cancer with significant response to HER2-targeting therapy and enfortumab vedotin.

Sun Michael M Schaap Ariel A Robinson Brian D BD Nanus David M DM Tagawa Scott T ST

American journal of clinical and experimental urology 20211015 5

In this case report, we present a patient with the rare plasmacytoid variant of urothelial cancer. Notable elements of his course include: complete response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin, development of metastatic disease to the rectum, sustained disease control with dual HER2 targeting therapy, and subsequent complete response to enfortumab vedotin. Plasmacytoid urothelial cancer accounts for just 1-3% of all urothelial cancer cases and is associated with more aggressive dis ...[more]

PMID: 34796255

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients with advanced urothelial carcinoma have poor overall survival after platinum-containing chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor treatment.MethodsWe conducted a global, open-label, phase 3 trial of enfortumab vedotin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy and had had disease progression during or after treatment with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or investigator-chosen chemotherapy (standard docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinflunine), administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival.ResultsA total of 608 patients underwent randomization; 301 were assigned to receive enfortumab vedotin and 307 to receive chemotherapy. As of July 15, 2020, a total of 301 deaths had occurred (134 in the enfortumab vedotin group and 167 in the chemotherapy group). At the prespecified interim analysis, the median follow-up was 11.1 months. Overall survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (median overall survival, 12.88 vs. 8.97 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.89; P = 0.001). Progression-free survival was also longer in the enfortumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (median progression-free survival, 5.55 vs. 3.71 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75; P<0.001). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (93.9% in the enfortumab vedotin group and 91.8% in the chemotherapy group); the incidence of events of grade 3 or higher was also similar in the two groups (51.4% and 49.8%, respectively).ConclusionsEnfortumab vedotin significantly prolonged survival as compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had previously received platinum-based treatment and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. (Funded by Astellas Pharma US and Seagen; EV-301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03474107.).

Project description:BackgroundTreatment options for patients with urothelial cancer (UC) refractory to platinum and immunotherapy are limited and survival is short. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a monoclonal anti-NECTIN4 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin. It was recently approved because of superior survival in comparison to standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy. Real-world patients, however, often have worse characteristics than patients included in clinical trials.ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of EV in a cohort of real-world patients.Design setting and participantsRetrospective data were collected from 23 hospitals and private practices for patients with metastatic and previously treated UC who received EV either when reimbursed by their insurance company before European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval, within a compassionate use program, or as SOC treatment after EMA approval. Imaging and therapy management were in accordance with local standards.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisAdverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Objective responses were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results and limitationsThe median age for the 125 eligible patients was 66 yr (range 31-89). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 0-1 for 76.0%, 2-4 for 13.6%, and unknown for 10.4% of patients. EV was administered in the fourth or later line for 44.8% of patients. The overall response rate was 41.6% (partial response 39.2%, complete response 2.4%). Median OS was 10.0 months (mo) (95% confidence interval 7.20-12.80) and median PFS was 5.0 mo (95% confidence interval 4.34-5.67). For patients with ECOG PS of 0-1, median OS was 14 mo. Any-grade AEs were observed in 67.2% and CTCAE grade ≥3 AEs in 30.4%. The most common AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy and skin toxicity. Three fatal events (pneumonia, pneumonitis) occurred. Limitations include the retrospective design and short follow-up.ConclusionsAdministration of EV for real-world patients was feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile. No new safety signals were reported. Antitumor activity in our cohort was comparable to data previously reported for trials. In summary, our results support the use of EV in patients with metastatic UC.Patient summaryEnfortumab vedotin is a medication that improved the survival of patients with bladder cancer in comparison to standard chemotherapy in clinical trials. However, patients included in clinical trials are highly selected and results for toxicities and improvements in survival do not always transfer to the real-world setting. We analyzed data for 125 patients who were treated with enfortumab vedotin. Our results are comparable to the outcomes from clinical trials regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Dataset Information

A case report of a patient with plasmacytoid urothelial cancer with significant response to HER2-targeting therapy and enfortumab vedotin.

Publications

A case report of a patient with plasmacytoid urothelial cancer with significant response to HER2-targeting therapy and enfortumab vedotin.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets