Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied for their psychometric properties for people with PIMD.Method
Professionals (N = 148) from three European countries completed a survey on assessment practices. We performed a literature search to find information about the psychometric properties of the instruments that were identified in the survey.Results
Of the participants, 78.1% used assessments that were not developed for people with PIMD. Documentation on psychometric properties was found for 8 out of 116 instruments.Conclusions
Most of the instruments in use were not designed for people with PIMD, and information about their quality is lacking. Guidelines are needed regarding the use and development of assessment methods for people with PIMD.
SUBMITTER: Wessels MD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8596661 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Wessels Marleen D MD van der Putten Annette A J AAJ Paap Muirne C S MCS
Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID 20210616 6
<h4>Background</h4>Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied for their psychometric properties for people with PIMD.<h4>Method</h4>Professionals (N = 148) from three European countries completed a survey on assessment practices. We performed a literature ...[more]