Dataset Information

Gender of Award Recipients in Major Ophthalmology Societies.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To assess the gender distribution of major ophthalmology society award recipients DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study METHODS: The study population included award recipients from 9 ophthalmologic societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Glaucoma Society, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Society of Retina Specialists, American Uveitis Society, Cornea Society, and North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society. A gender-specific pronoun and a photograph of each award recipient were extracted from professional websites to assign their gender. Main outcome measures were gender distribution by award society, year (1970-2020), type (lectureship or not), category (achievement, education, research contribution, research item, international member achievement, public service-global health, service to society), and training level.

Results

Out of 2,150 recipients for 78 awards, 1,606 (74.7%) were men and 544 (25.3%) were women. The proportion of women recipients increased from 0% in 1970 to 33.2% in 2020 (P < .001). Women representation varied within each society (P < .01), with ASCRS having the highest percentage (40.8%). Women received 11.0% of awards accompanied by a lecture. Women received a significantly greater proportion of research-related awards than achievement or service awards. Awards for trainees and early-career ophthalmologists had a greater proportion of women (39.8%) than the rest of the awards (21.5%) (P < .001).

Conclusions

Overall, women received awards (25.3%) at a higher rate than the average 1970-2020 American gender distributions of ophthalmologists. However, women are still under-represented in many award categories and subspecialties.

SUBMITTER: Nguyen AX

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8608693 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gender of Award Recipients in Major Ophthalmology Societies.

Nguyen Anne Xuan-Lan AX Ratan Sanyam S Biyani Ankita A Trinh Xuan-Vi XV Saleh Solin S Sun Yang Y Wu Albert Y AY

American journal of ophthalmology 20210606

<h4>Purpose</h4>To assess the gender distribution of major ophthalmology society award recipients DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study METHODS: The study population included award recipients from 9 ophthalmologic societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Glaucoma Society, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Societ ...[more]

PMID: 34102152

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough women remain historically underrepresented in medical achievement awards, gender distribution of award recipients in ophthalmology in Canada remain to be explored based on research productivity metrics.ObjectiveTo characterize the gender distribution of award recipients among the main Canadian national ophthalmological societies and subspecialty affiliates based on research productivity, graduate degrees, affiliated institution, and award type.DesignRetrospective, observational study.MethodsAward recipients were selected from the Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS), Canadian Association of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (CAPOS); Canadian Cornea, External Disease, and Refractive Surgery Society (CCEDRSS); Canadian Council of Ophthalmology Residents (CCOR) Research Proposal Award; and Canadian Glaucoma Society (CGS). The recipients' gender was determined by web search for the gender-specific pronoun, profile photograph check, or using Gender-API. Outcomes included gender distribution of recipients per award, society, year, and training level and differences in research productivity.ResultsThirteen special awards were given to 255 recipients (215 individuals) from 1995 to 2022. In total, 31% of recipients were women, the majority being from Canada. Women had a significantly lower median h-index (2.0 (0-62) women versus 4.0 (0-81) men, p = 0.001) and number of published documents (3.0 (0-213) women versus 8.0 (0-447) men, p < 0.001). On stratified analyses by type of award (research or lifetime achievement) and level of training (trainee or ophthalmologist), significant differences were found for mean h-index and number of publications for awardees within the research category (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively) and trainee level (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Overall, women's proportion rates in awards did not reach parity in 27 out of the 28 years analyzed.ConclusionWomen were confirmed to be historically minored in proportion among the prominent society awards in Canada, with attested research disparity possibly explaining some of this bias. These findings require further confirmation in larger cohorts accounting for additional educational, institutional, and provincial factors.RegistrationNot applicable.

Project description:ImportanceAlthough almost equal numbers of male and female medical students enter into ophthalmology residency programs, whether they have similar surgical experiences during training is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine differences for cataract surgery and total procedural volume between male and female residents during ophthalmology residency.Design, setting, participantsThis retrospective, longitudinal analysis of resident case logs from 24 US ophthalmology residency programs spanned July 2005 to June 2017. A total of 1271 residents were included. Data were analyzed from August 12, 2017, through April 4, 2018.Main outcomes and measuresVariables analyzed included mean volumes of cataract surgery and total procedures, resident gender, and maternity or paternity leave status.ResultsAmong the 1271 residents included in the analysis (815 men [64.1%]), being female was associated with performing fewer cataract operations and total procedures. Male residents performed a mean (SD) of 176.7 (66.2) cataract operations, and female residents performed a mean (SD) of 161.7 (56.2) (mean difference, -15.0 [95% CI, -22.2 to -7.8]; P < .001); men performed a mean (SD) of 509.4 (208.6) total procedures and women performed a mean (SD) of 451.3 (158.8) (mean difference, -58.1 [95% CI, -80.2 to -36.0]; P < .001). Eighty-five of 815 male residents (10.4%) and 71 of 456 female residents (15.6%) took parental leave. Male residents who took paternity leave performed a mean of 27.5 (95% CI, 13.3 to 41.6; P < .001) more cataract operations compared with men who did not take leave, but female residents who took maternity leave performed similar numbers of operations as women who did not take leave (mean difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -18.0 to 14.0]; P = .81). From 2005 to 2017, each additional year was associated with a 5.5 (95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7; P < .001) increase in cataract volume and 24.4 (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8; P < .001) increase in total procedural volume. This increase was not different between genders for cataract procedure volume (β = -1.6 [95% CI, -3.7 to 0.4]; P = .11) but was different for total procedural volume such that the increase in total procedural volume over time for men was greater than that for women (β = -8.0 [95% CI, -14.0 to -2.1]; P = .008).Conclusions and relevanceFemale residents performed 7.8 to 22.2 fewer cataract operations and 36.0 to 80.2 fewer total procedures compared with their male counterparts from 2005 to 2017, a finding that warrants further exploration to ensure that residents have equivalent surgical training experiences during residency regardless of gender. However, this study included a limited number of programs (24 of 119 [20.2%]). Future research including all ophthalmology residency programs may minimize the selection bias issues present in this study.

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the representation of various gender, racial, and ethnic groups in ophthalmology clinical trials conducted in the United States (US) between 1997 and 2022.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.ParticipantsWe included all participants in completed phase II/III, III, and IV ophthalmology clinical trials reported on the ClincialTrials.gov database.MethodsThe proportional enrollment of each racial/ethnic and gender group in the clinical trials was calculated and compared with the US population. We also investigated the impact of various clinical trial features on the rate of reporting demographic information and enrollment of minorities.Main outcome measuresProportional enrollment of each gender and race/ethnicity group compared with the US Census.ResultsOf the total clinical trials included in the study, less than half (43.6%) provided information on the racial or ethnic backgrounds of their participants. The majority of the enrollees in trials were female (median: 57.5%, interquartile range [IQR]: 47.2%-65.8%). Among the trials that reported race and/or ethnicity data, White populations were overrepresented (median: 76.6%, IQR: 69.0%-84.0%, P = 0.001), and minorities, including Asian, Hispanic, and "other" groups, were underrepresented compared with the 2010 US Census (P < 0.001). Enrollment of Black individuals was found to be comparable to the US population estimates (median: 12.4%, IQR: 6.2%-20.8%, P = 0.44). The trial phase, the number of study participants, the primary clinical condition, and the year the trial started all affected demographic reporting and minority enrollments.ConclusionsOur findings highlight the need for increased efforts to promote diversity and inclusivity in ophthalmology clinical trials. Ensuring equitable inclusion of different gender, racial, and ethnic groups in the trials is essential for minimizing disparities and producing unbiased scientific findings generalizable to the entire population.Financial disclosuresProprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Dataset Information

Gender of Award Recipients in Major Ophthalmology Societies.

Purpose

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Gender of Award Recipients in Major Ophthalmology Societies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets