No difference in learning outcomes and usability between using controllers and hand tracking during a virtual reality endotracheal intubation training for medical students in Thailand.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We developed a virtual reality (VR) endotracheal intubation training that applied 2 interaction modalities (hand-tracking or controllers). It aimed to investigate the differences in usability between using hand tracking and controllers during the VR intervention for intubation training for medical students from February 2021 to March 2021 in Thailand.

Methods

Forty-five participants were divided into 3 groups: video only, video with VR controller training, and video with VR hand tracking training. Pre-test, post-test, and practice scores were used to assess learning outcomes. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ) questionnaires were used to evaluate the differences between the VR groups. The sample comprised 45 medical

SUBMITTER: Khundam C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8616725 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature