Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is an emerging approach for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) which combines the excellent long-term outcomes of surgery with the early recovery and reduced short-term complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of HCR compared to PCI in patients with MVD.

Methods

A systematic database search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL/CCTR was conducted by June 2021. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, comparing major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days and at latest follow-up between patients undergoing HCR versus PCI.

Results

A total of 27,041 patients (HCR: 939 patients, PCI: 26,102 patients) were included from seven s

SUBMITTER: Van den Eynde J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8645443 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature