Dataset Information

Augmented Reality as a Tool to Guide PSI Placement in Pelvic Tumor Resections.

ABSTRACT: Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) have become a valuable tool for osteotomy guidance in complex surgical scenarios such as pelvic tumor resection. They provide similar accuracy to surgical navigation systems but are generally more convenient and faster. However, their correct placement can become challenging in some anatomical regions, and it cannot be verified objectively during the intervention. Incorrect installations can result in high deviations from the planned osteotomy, increasing the risk of positive resection margins. In this work, we propose to use augmented reality (AR) to guide and verify PSIs placement. We designed an experiment to assess the accuracy provided by the system using a smartphone and the HoloLens 2 and compared the results with the conventional freehand method. The results showed significant differences, where AR guidance prevented high osteotomy deviations, reducing maximal deviation of 54.03 mm for freehand placements to less than 5 mm with AR guidance. The experiment was performed in two versions of a plastic three-dimensional (3D) printed phantom, one including a silicone layer to simulate tissue, providing more realism. We also studied how differences in shape and location of PSIs affect their accuracy, concluding that those with smaller sizes and a homogeneous target surface are more prone to errors. Our study presents promising results that prove AR's potential to overcome the present limitations of PSIs conveniently and effectively.

SUBMITTER: Garcia-Sevilla M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8659846 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Augmented Reality as a Tool to Guide PSI Placement in Pelvic Tumor Resections.

García-Sevilla Mónica M Moreta-Martinez Rafael R García-Mato David D Pose-Diez-de-la-Lastra Alicia A Pérez-Mañanes Rubén R Calvo-Haro José Antonio JA Pascau Javier J

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20211124 23

Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) have become a valuable tool for osteotomy guidance in complex surgical scenarios such as pelvic tumor resection. They provide similar accuracy to surgical navigation systems but are generally more convenient and faster. However, their correct placement can become challenging in some anatomical regions, and it cannot be verified objectively during the intervention. Incorrect installations can result in high deviations from the planned osteotomy, increasing the ...[more]

PMID: 34883825

Similar Datasets

Project description:Robot-assisted surgery is becoming popular in the operation room (OR) for, e.g., orthopedic surgery (among other surgeries). However, robotic executions related to surgical steps cannot simply rely on preoperative plans. Using pedicle screw placement as an example, extra adjustments are needed to adapt to the intraoperative changes when the preoperative planning is outdated. During surgery, adjusting a surgical plan is non-trivial and typically rather complex since the available interfaces used in current robotic systems are not always intuitive to use. Recently, thanks to technical advancements in head-mounted displays (HMD), augmented reality (AR)-based medical applications are emerging in the OR. The rendered virtual objects can be overlapped with real-world physical objects to offer intuitive displays of the surgical sites and anatomy. Moreover, the potential of combining AR with robotics is even more promising; however, it has not been fully exploited. In this paper, an innovative AR-based robotic approach is proposed and its technical feasibility in simulated pedicle screw placement is demonstrated. An approach for spatial calibration between the robot and HoloLens 2 without using an external 3D tracking system is proposed. The developed system offers an intuitive AR-robot interaction approach between the surgeon and the surgical robot by projecting the current surgical plan to the surgeon for fine-tuning and transferring the updated surgical plan immediately back to the robot side for execution. A series of bench-top experiments were conducted to evaluate system accuracy and human-related errors. A mean calibration error of 3.61 mm was found. The overall target pose error was 3.05 mm in translation and 1.12∘ in orientation. The average execution time for defining a target entry point intraoperatively was 26.56 s. This work offers an intuitive AR-based robotic approach, which could facilitate robotic technology in the OR and boost synergy between AR and robots for other medical applications.

Project description:BackgroundAR based navigation of spine surgeries may not only provide accurate surgical execution but also operator independency by compensating for potential skill deficits. "Direct" AR-navigation, namely superposing trajectories on anatomy directly, have not been investigated regarding their accuracy and operator's dependence.Purpose of this study was to prove operator independent reliability and accuracy of both AR assisted pedicle screw navigation and AR assisted rod bending in a cadaver setting.MethodsTwo experienced spine surgeons and two biomedical engineers (laymen) performed independently from each other pedicle screw instrumentations from L1-L5 in a total of eight lumbar cadaver specimens (20 screws/operator) using a fluoroscopy-free AR based navigation method. Screw fitting rods from L1 to S2-Ala-Ileum were bent bilaterally using an AR based rod bending navigation method (4 rods/operator). Outcome measures were pedicle perforations, accuracy compared to preoperative plan, registration time, navigation time, total rod bending time and operator's satisfaction for these procedures.Results97.5% of all screws were safely placed (<2 mm perforation), overall mean deviation from planned trajectory was 6.8±3.9°, deviation from planned entry point was 4±2.7 mm, registration time per vertebra was 2:25 min (00:56 to 10:00 min), navigation time per screw was 1:07 min (00:15 to 12:43 min) rod bending time per rod was 4:22 min (02:07 to 10:39 min), operator's satisfaction with AR based screw and rod navigation was 5.38±0.67 (1 to 6, 6 being the best rate). Comparison of surgeons and laymen revealed significant difference in navigation time (1:01 min; 00:15 to 3:00 min vs. 01:37 min; 00:23 to 12:43 min; p = 0.004, respectively) but not in pedicle perforation rate.ConclusionsDirect AR based screw and rod navigation using a surface digitization registration technique is reliable and independent of surgical experience. The accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine is comparable with the current standard techniques.

Project description:BackgroundRecently, the demand for mechanical ventilation (MV) has increased with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the conventional approaches to MV training are resource intensive and require on-site training. Consequently, the need for independent learning platforms with remote assistance in institutions without resources has surged.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an augmented reality (AR)-based self-learning platform for novices to set up a ventilator without on-site assistance.MethodsThis prospective randomized controlled pilot study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center, Korea, from January to February 2022. Nurses with no prior experience of MV or AR were enrolled. We randomized the participants into 2 groups: manual and AR groups. Participants in the manual group used a printed manual and made a phone call for assistance, whereas participants in the AR group were guided by AR-based instructions and requested assistance with the head-mounted display. We compared the overall score of the procedure, required level of assistance, and user experience between the groups.ResultsIn total, 30 participants completed the entire procedure with or without remote assistance. Fewer participants requested assistance in the AR group compared to the manual group (7/15, 47.7% vs 14/15, 93.3%; P=.02). The number of steps that required assistance was also lower in the AR group compared to the manual group (n=13 vs n=33; P=.004). The AR group had a higher rating in predeveloped questions for confidence (median 3, IQR 2.50-4.00 vs median 2, IQR 2.00-3.00; P=.01), suitability of method (median 4, IQR 4.00-5.00 vs median 3, IQR 3.00-3.50; P=.01), and whether they intended to recommend AR systems to others (median 4, IQR 3.00-5.00 vs median 3, IQR 2.00-3.00; P=.002).ConclusionsAR-based instructions to set up a mechanical ventilator were feasible for novices who had no prior experience with MV or AR. Additionally, participants in the AR group required less assistance compared with those in the manual group, resulting in higher confidence after training.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05446896; https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05446896.

Project description:PurposePlacement of zygomatic implants in the most optimal prosthetic position is considered challenging due to limited bone mass of the zygoma, limited visibility, length of the drilling path and proximity to critical anatomical structures. Augmented reality (AR) navigation can eliminate some of the disadvantages of surgical guides and conventional surgical navigation, while potentially improving accuracy. In this human cadaver study, we evaluated a developed AR navigation approach for placement of zygomatic implants after total maxillectomy.MethodsThe developed AR navigation interface connects a commercial navigation system with the Microsoft HoloLens. AR navigated surgery was performed to place 20 zygomatic implants using five human cadaver skulls after total maxillectomy. To determine accuracy, postoperative scans were virtually matched with preoperative three-dimensional virtual surgical planning, and distances in mm from entry-exit points and angular deviations were calculated as outcome measures. Results were compared with a previously conducted study in which zygomatic implants were positioned with 3D printed surgical guides.ResultsThe mean entry point deviation was 2.43 ± 1.33 mm and a 3D angle deviation of 5.80 ± 4.12° (range 1.39-19.16°). The mean exit point deviation was 3.28 mm (±2.17). The abutment height deviation was on average 2.20 ± 1.35 mm. The accuracy of the abutment in the occlusal plane was 4.13 ± 2.53 mm. Surgical guides perform significantly better for the entry-point (P = 0.012) and 3D angle (P = 0.05); however, there is no significant difference in accuracy for the exit-point (P = 0.143) when using 3D printed drill guides or AR navigated surgery.ConclusionDespite the higher precision of surgical guides, AR navigation demonstrated acceptable accuracy, with potential for improvement and specialized applications. The study highlights the feasibility of AR navigation for zygomatic implant placement, offering an alternative to conventional methods.

Dataset Information

Augmented Reality as a Tool to Guide PSI Placement in Pelvic Tumor Resections.

Publications

Augmented Reality as a Tool to Guide PSI Placement in Pelvic Tumor Resections.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets