Dataset Information

Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection.

Methods

This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection.

Results

ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p < .001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p < .001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0).

Conclusions

In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients.

Trial registration

NCT Unique ID: 00844220 KEY POINTS: • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA.

SUBMITTER: Laskowski D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8660731 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography.

Laskowski Dominik D Feger Sarah S Bosserdt Maria M Zimmermann Elke E Mohamed Mahmoud M Kendziora Benjamin B Rief Matthias M Dreger Henryk H Estrella Melanie M Dewey Marc M

European radiology 20210615 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection.<h4>Methods</h4>This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary A ...[more]

PMID: 34129067

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo associate coronary wall volume and composition, derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), with cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) detected on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in heart-transplanted (HTX) patients.MethodsWe included consecutive adults who received ICA and coronary CTA for evaluation of CAV ≥ 10 months after HTX. In all coronary segments, we assessed lumen and wall volumes and segmental length, calculated volume-length ratio (VLR) (volumes indexed by segmental length; mm3/mm), wall burden (WB) (wall/wall + lumen volumes; %), and assessed proportions of calcified, fibrotic, fibro-fatty, and low-attenuation tissue (%) in coronary wall. We rendered independent CTA measures associated with CAV by ICA, tested their discriminatory capacity, and assessed concordance between CTA and ICA.ResultsAmong 50 patients (84% men; 53.6 ± 11.9 years), we analyzed 632 coronary segments. Mean interval between HTX and CTA was 6.7 ± 4.7 years and between ICA and CTA 1 (0-1) day. Segmental VLR, WB, and proportion of fibrotic tissue were independently associated with CAV (OR = 1.06-1.27; p ≤ 0.002), reaching a high discriminatory capacity (combination of all three: AUC = 0.84; 95%CI, 0.75-0.90). Concordance between CTA and ICA was higher in advanced CAV (88%) compared with that in none (37%) and mild (19%) CAV. Discordance was primarily driven by a large number of segments with coronary wall changes on CTA but without luminal stenoses on ICA (177/591; 25%).ConclusionCTA-derived coronary wall VLR, WB, and the proportion of fibrotic tissue are independent markers of CAV. Combination of these three parameters may aid the detection of early CAV not detected by ICA, the current standard of care.Key points• Coronary CTA detects CAV in HTX patients. • Coronary wall volume-length ratio, wall burden, and proportion of fibrotic tissue are independently associated with CAV. • In contrast to ICA, coronary CTA may identify the early stages of CAV.

Project description:ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of dual-source CT coronary angiography (DSCTCA) against invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in assessing stenotic cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in heart transplant (HTX) recipients.MethodsConsecutive HTX recipients(n = 38) on annual surveillance, underwent DSCTCA prior to ICA on a 192-detector 384-slice DSCT scanner. Cases were classified as no CAV (no stenosis), any CAV (any degree of stenosis) or significant CAV (>50% stenosis).ResultsMean age was 33.66 ± 11.45 years (M:F = 27:11, median time from HTX-23.5 months). Prevalence of any CAV on DSCTCA and ICA was 44.7%(n = 17) and 39.5%(n = 15), respectively and that of significant CAV was 21.1%(n = 8) and 15.8%(n = 6), respectively. 557 (96.7%) segments were interpretable on DSCTCA. Mean radiation dose was 4.24 ± 2.15 mSv. At patient-level, the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value (NPV), and DA of DSCTCA for detection of any CAV and significant CAV were 100%, 91.3%, 88.2%, 100%, 94.73% and 100%, 94%, 75%, 100%, 95% respectively. The same on segment-based analysis were 96%, 97.6%, 80%, 99.6%, 97.5% and 100%, 99.6%,86.7%,100%, 99.6%, respectively. There was excellent agreement between the two modalities for detection of any CAV and significant CAV [κ = 0.892 and 0.826 (patient-level), 0.859 and 0.927 (segment-level)]. CAC score correlated significantly with the presence of any CAV on both modalities. A diagnosis of rejection on biopsy did not correlate with any/significant CAV on DSCTCA or ICA.ConclusionHigh sensitivity and NPV of DSCTCA in the evaluation of stenotic CAV suggests that it can be an accurate and non-invasive alternative to ICA for routine surveillance of HTX recipients.Advances in knowledgeDSCTCA detects the stenotic CAV non-invasively in transplant recipients with high sensitivity, specificity and NPV when compared with catheter coronary angiography, at lower radiation doses. There is excellent agreement between CT angiography and catheter coronary angiography for detection of any CAV and significant CAV. A diagnosis of rejection on biopsy does not correlate with any/significant CAV on CT angiography or catheter angiography.

Project description:Background High-risk plaque (HRP) features as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) predict acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to determine whether coronary CTA-specific definitions of HRP improve discrimination of patients with ACS as compared with definitions from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods and Results In patients with suspected ACS, randomized to coronary CTA in the ROMICAT II (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia Using Computer Assisted Tomography II) trial, we retrospectively performed semiautomated quantitative analysis of HRP (including remodeling index, plaque burden as derived by plaque area, low computed tomography attenuation plaque volume) and degree of luminal stenosis and analyzed the performance of traditional IVUS thresholds to detect ACS. Furthermore, we derived CTA-specific thresholds in patients with ACS to detect culprit lesions and applied those to all patients to calculate the discriminatory ability to detect ACS in comparison to IVUS thresholds. Of 472 patients, 255 patients (56±7.8 years; 63% men) had coronary plaque. In 32 patients (6.8%) with ACS, culprit plaques (n=35) differed from nonculprit plaques (n=172) with significantly greater values for all HRP features except minimal luminal area (significantly lower; all P<0.01). IVUS definitions showed good performance while minimal luminal area (odds ratio: 6.82; P=0.014) and plaque burden (odds ratio: 5.71; P=0.008) were independently associated with ACS but not remodeling index (odds ratio: 0.78; P=0.673). Optimized CTA-specific thresholds for plaque burden (area under the curve: 0.832 versus 0.676) and degree of stenosis (area under the curve: 0.826 versus 0.721) showed significantly higher diagnostic performance for ACS as compared with IVUS-based thresholds (all P<0.05) with borderline significance for minimal luminal area (area under the curve: 0.817 versus 0.742; P=0.066). Conclusions CTA-specific definitions of HRP features may improve the discrimination of patients with ACS as compared with IVUS-based definitions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01084239.

Dataset Information

Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Publications

Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets