Dual-Mobility Implants and Constrained Liners in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Instability remains the most common complication after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in aseptic revision rates and survivorship between dual-mobility (DM) and constrained liners (CL) in revision THA.

Methods

We reviewed a consecutive series of 2432 revision THA patients from 2008 to 2019 at our institution and identified all patients who received either a CL or DM bearing. We compared demographics, comorbidities, indications, dislocations, and aseptic failure rates between the two groups. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for failure, and a Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with an aseptic re-revision as the endpoint.

SUBMITTER: Chisari E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8661104 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature