Dataset Information

Insufficient pain control for patients with cancer and dementia during terminal cancer stages.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To estimate differences in pain control between patients with cancer and with or without dementia during terminal cancer stages 3 months or 1 month before cancer death.

Patients and methods

We conducted frequency matching cohort for age, sex, and year of death for both groups at a 1:4 ratio. The prescription prevalence, total cumulative dose, and average daily dose of opioids during the terminal cancer stages 3 months and 1 month before cancer death were estimated.

Results

Patients with cancer and dementia were prescribed lower amounts of opioids 3 months before death (57.5% vs. 73.9%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.49) and 1 month before death (54.4% vs. 70.3%, respectively; adjusted OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.47-0.53). The total cumulative dose of opioids (mg) was lower in patients with cancer and dementia 3 and 1 month(s) before death (3 months: 1,578 mg vs. 2,666 mg, respectively; β=-1,125.9, P<0.001; 1 month: 921 mg vs. 1,533 mg, respectively; β=-622.1, P<0.001). The average daily opioid dose (mg/day), patients with cancer and dementia received a lower dose 3 months before death (31 mg vs. 48 mg; β=-22.6, P<0.001) and 1 month before death (38 mg vs. 60 mg; β=-17.1, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The prevalence of opioid prescription was significantly lower in patients with both cancer and dementia during their terminal cancer stages 3 months and 1 month before death.

SUBMITTER: Hsu WH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8661160 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Insufficient pain control for patients with cancer and dementia during terminal cancer stages.

Hsu Wei-Hung WH Hsieh Jyh-Gang JG Wang Ying-Wei YW Hsieh Chia-Jung CJ Lin Huang-Ren HR Wu Szu-Yuan SY

American journal of translational research 20211115 11

<h4>Purpose</h4>To estimate differences in pain control between patients with cancer and with or without dementia during terminal cancer stages 3 months or 1 month before cancer death.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>We conducted frequency matching cohort for age, sex, and year of death for both groups at a 1:4 ratio. The prescription prevalence, total cumulative dose, and average daily dose of opioids during the terminal cancer stages 3 months and 1 month before cancer death were estimated.<h4>Resu ...[more]

PMID: 34956521

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe undertreatment of cancer pain is a global issue although many international guidelines and various studies bloom to explore the approaches in pain management. However, there is no standard care for cancer pain in routine practices. To set up a standardized procedure for improving cancer pain management in Taiwan, the Good Pain Management (GPM) program is explored to provide treatments following the US National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) Adult Cancer Pain Guideline.MethodPatients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe cancer pain were eligible and randomized into the GPM or control arm and observed the first 48 h to evaluate the effects of pain management between 2 arms. Pain control, adequacy of treatments, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL) of eligible patients were analyzed. Ad hoc analyses based on the pain medication category were also conducted.ResultFifty-one patients were enrolled, with 26 and 25 assigned to the GPM and control arms, respectively. Significant differences among the GPM and control arms were found including a greater decrease in the mean numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the GPM arm (- 4.6 vs. - 2.8), a lower proportion of moderate-to-severe pain in the GPM arm (23.2% vs. 39.8%), and a higher pain management index (PMI) score in the GPM arm (0.64 points vs. 0.33 points) (all p < 0.05). Ad hoc analyses revealed that the patient subgroups using strong opioids showed better patient satisfaction in GPM arm when compared with the same subgroup in the control arm.ConclusionIn summary, our study demonstrated that the implementation of a standardized pain assessment and management approach (GPM ward program) showed significant improvements on pain relief, decreased the portion of moderate-to-severe cancer pain, and increased patient satisfaction in the 1st 48 h after admission. The implementation of the GPM approach in the cancer ward may provide sooner and better improvement of cancer pain management for patients who suffered moderate-to-severe cancer pain.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03155516).

Project description:Background/Aims:In most instances of abdominal pain associated with pancreatic cancer, pain may become refractory to increasing doses of narcotics. Celiac plexus neurolysis represents an option; however, altered celiac plexus anatomy may render this treatment infeasible or ineffective, where splanchnic nerve neurolysis may represent another option. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of splanchnic neurolysis in pancreatic cancer patients not responsive to celiac plexus neurolysis. Patients and Methods:Among all 84 patients who underwent celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain during the study period, 34 patients did not respond and underwent splanchnic nerve neurolysis under fluoroscopic guidance and thus included in this retrospective study. Stage IV, III, and II disease was present in 38.2%, 47.1%, and 14.7% of the patients. During the study, 88.2% were receiving chemotherapy, whereas none were on radiotherapy. Data for daily narcotic dose equivalents and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores during outpatient visits at baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months were extracted. Results:Pain response rates were 76.5%, 84.4%, and 71.0%, at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months, respectively. A significant and dramatic reduction was seen in VAS scores at 2 weeks (2.8±1.2 versus 6.3±1.1, p<0.001), and this significant decline was maintained for 3 months. Similarly, a significant and dramatic reduction was seen in daily narcotic need at 2 weeks (20.8±32.9 versus 93.4±86.2 mg, p<0.001), which was also maintained during the 3-month follow-up. The procedure was generally well tolerated. Conclusion:Findings of this study suggest that splanchnic neurolysis represents a durable and effective option for pain control in pancreatic cancer patients in whom the neurolysis of the celiac plexus is ineffective. However, these conclusions refer to only preliminary single-center results in a selected patient group; thus, further large studies are warranted.

Dataset Information

Insufficient pain control for patients with cancer and dementia during terminal cancer stages.

Purpose

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Insufficient pain control for patients with cancer and dementia during terminal cancer stages.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets