Project description:Intraportal islet transplantation has proven to be efficacious in preventing severe hypoglycemia and restoring insulin independence in selected patients with type 1 diabetes. Multiple islet infusions are often required to achieve and maintain insulin independence. Many challenges remain in clinical islet transplantation, including substantial islet cell loss early and late after islet infusion. Contributions to graft loss include the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction, potent host auto- and alloimmune responses, and beta cell toxicity from immunosuppressive agents. Protective strategies are being tested to circumvent several of these events including exploration of alternative transplantation sites, stem cell-derived insulin producing cell therapies, co-transplantation with mesenchymal stem cells or exploration of novel immune protective agents. Herein, we provide a brief introduction and history of islet cell transplantation, limitations associated with this procedure and methods to alleviate islet cell loss as a means to improve engraftment outcomes.
Project description:Although the association between post-transplant malignancy (PTM) and immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation has been studied, an integrated review of PTM after lung transplantation is lacking. We investigated the incidence and types of de novo PTM and its impact on survival following double lung transplantation (DLT). The incidence and type of PTM as well as the annual and cumulative risks of each malignancy after DLT were analyzed. The overall survival (OS) of recipients with or without PTM was compared by the Kaplan-Meier survival method and landmark analysis. There were 5,629 cases (23.52%) with 27 types of PTMs and incidences and OS varied according to the types of PTMs. The recipients with PTM showed a significantly longer OS than those without PTM (p < 0.001). However, while the recipients with PTM showed significantly better OS at 3, and 5 years (p < 0.001, p = 0.007), it was worse at the 10-year landmark time (p = 0.013). And the single PTM group showed a worse OS rate than the multiple PTM group (p < 0.001). This comprehensive report on PTM following DLT can help understand the risks and timing of PTM to improve the implementation of screening and treatment.
Project description:BackgroundPeople on the kidney waitlist are less informed about potential suspensions. Disparities may exist among those who are suspended and who return to the waitlist. We evaluated the patient journey after entering the waitlist, including suspensions and outcomes, and factors associated with these transitions.MethodsWe included all incident patients waitlisted for their first transplant from deceased donors in Australia from 2006 to 2019. We described all clinical transitions after entering the waitlist. We predicted the restricted mean survival time (unadjusted and adjusted) until first transplant by the number of prior suspensions. We evaluated factors associated with transitions using flexible survival models and clinical endpoints using Cox models.ResultsOf 8466 patients waitlisted and followed over 45 757.4 person-years (median 4.8 years), 6741 (80%) were transplanted, 381 (5%) died waiting and 1344 (16%) were still waiting. A total of 3127 (37%) people were suspended at least once. Predicted mean time from waitlist to transplant was 3.0 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-3.2] when suspended versus 1.9 years (95% CI 1.8-1.9) when never suspended. Prior suspension increased the likelihood of further suspensions 4.2-fold (95% CI 3.8-4.6) and returning to the waitlist by 50% (95% CI 36-65) but decreased the likelihood of transplantation by 29% (95% CI 62-82). Death risk while waiting was increased 12-fold (95% CI 8.0-18.3) when currently suspended. Australian non-Indigenous males were 13% [hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23)] and Asian males 23% [HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.42)] more likely to return to the waitlist compared with females of the same ethnicity.ConclusionThe waitlist journey was not straightforward. Suspension was common, impacted the chance of transplantation and meant waiting an average of 1 year longer until transplant. We have provided estimates for and factors associated with suspension, relisting and outcomes after waitlisting to support more informed discussions. This evidence is critical to further understand drivers of inequitable access to transplantation.
Project description:ObjectiveThis research describes the clinical pathway and characteristics of two cohorts of patients. The first cohort consists of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer while the second consists of patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) and no evidence of lung cancer. Linked data from an electronic medical record and the Louisiana Tumor Registry were used in this investigation.Materials and methodsREACHnet is one of 9 clinical research networks (CRNs) in PCORnet®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network and includes electronic health records for over 8 million patients from multiple partner health systems. Data from Ochsner Health System and Tulane Medical Center were linked to Louisiana Tumor Registry (LTR), a statewide population-based cancer registry, for analysis of patient's clinical pathways between July 2013 and 2017. Patient characteristics and health services utilization rates by cancer stage were reported as frequency distributions. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate the time from index date to diagnosis by stage in lung cancer cohort.ResultsA total of 30,559 potentially eligible patients were identified and 2929 (9.58%) had primary lung cancer. Of these, 1496 (51.1%) were documented in LTR and their clinical pathway to diagnosis was further studied. Time to diagnosis varied significantly by cancer stage. A total of 24,140 patients with an SPN were identified in REACHnet and 15,978 (66.6%) had documented follow up care for 1 year. 1612 (10%) had no evidence of any work up for their SPN. The remaining 14,366 had some evidence of follow up, primarily office visits and additional chest imaging.ConclusionIn both cohorts multiple biopsies were evident in the clinical pathway. Despite clinical workup, 70% of patients in the lung cancer cohort had stage III or IV disease. In the SPN cohort, only 66% were identified as receiving a diagnostic work-up.
Project description:Lung transplantation may be the only intervention that can prolong survival and improve quality of life for those individuals with advanced lung disease who are acceptable candidates for the procedure. However, these candidates may be extremely ill and require ventilator and/or circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, and lung transplantation recipients are at risk of numerous post-transplant complications that include surgical complications, primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection, opportunistic infection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which may be caused by chronic rejection. Many advances in pre- and post-transplant management have led to improved outcomes over the past decade. These include the creation of sound guidelines for candidate selection, improved surgical techniques, advances in donor lung preservation, an improving ability to suppress and treat allograft rejection, the development of prophylaxis protocols to decrease the incidence of opportunistic infection, more effective therapies for treating infectious complications, and the development of novel therapies to treat and manage CLAD. A major obstacle to prolonged survival beyond the early post-operative time period is the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), which is the most common form of CLAD. This manuscript discusses recent and evolving advances in the field of lung transplantation.
Project description:BackgroundAlthough single and double lung transplantation outcomes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been investigated, right and left single lung transplants have never been rigorously compared to evaluate disease-specific differences. Single lung transplants for COPD often have hyperinflation of the contralateral native lung, which may be more pronounced in left lung transplants.MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 5,585 adults who underwent lung transplantation for COPD from May 4, 2005 to June 30, 2017. Subjects were followed until March 2019. Post-transplant survival was compared using Cox proportional hazards and Royston and Parmar's flexible parametric survival models. We adjusted for donor and recipient factors with known or plausible associations with survival.ResultsLung transplant recipients who received a left single lung transplant for COPD had an increased risk of post-transplant death when compared with those who received a right single lung transplant for COPD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08-1.48, p = 0.002). Survival did not differ significantly between double lung transplant and right single lung transplant recipients (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-1.02, p = 0.086). Adjusted 5-year survival was 57.8% (95% CI: 55.7-60.1) for double lung recipients, 56.7% (95% CI: 55.4-58.0) for right single lung recipients, and 50.9% (95% CI: 47.2-55.0) for left single lung recipients.ConclusionsIn COPD, right single lung transplantation was associated with improved post-transplant survival compared with left single lung transplantation, and no significant difference in post-transplant survival compared with double lung transplantation was found. In light of the ongoing donor lung shortage, preferential allocation of right single lungs to patients with COPD should be considered.
Project description:Complete disease journey and risk factors for poor outcomes are needed to facilitate effectiveness evaluations of new therapies and clinical decision-making in B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), particularly in Asia where such data are lacking. This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records from a regional medical centre in southern Taiwan to follow-up 441 patients newly diagnosed with common B-NHL subtypes: Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), between 01-Jan-2008 and 31-Dec-2013, until 31-Dec-2017. Treatment pathways were modelled using a Markov approach. Stage III/IV disease at diagnosis was frequent for patients with DLBCL, FL, MCL and WM. Hepatitis B surface antigen/hepatitis C virus seropositivity was 18.6%/12.3%. Clinical responses to 1st-line treatment were observed in 76.0% (DLBCL), 87.3% (FL), 86.0% (MZL), 60.0% (MCL), and 42.9% (WM) of patients. For DLBCL, disease control was achieved by ~ 50% after 1st-line, ~ 24% after 2nd-line, ~ 17% after 3rd-line. Patients with Stage III/IV DLBCL or age > 65 years at diagnosis had lower rates of active treatment, poorer disease control and higher mortality than patients with early stage disease or age ≤ 65 years. Disease flare < 6 months after 1st-line treatment was significantly associated with mortality. Despite good clinical response rates for some sub-types, survival remains poor. New treatments are needed to improve the outcome of B-NHL.
Project description:IntroductionSarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disorder with uncertain etiology, commonly involves the lungs and, to a lesser extent, the liver.Case presentationA previously healthy 35-year-old Congolese female was admitted with a 7-month history of jaundice, itching, and weight loss. Despite markedly mixed hepatitis of a cholestatic pattern of liver injury, liver function tests remained normal in admission laboratory work. Enlarged ethiological study was negative for infections, autoimmunity, heavy metal poisoning, and metabolic diseases. Imaging aligned with compatible biopsy histology led to the diagnosis of hepatic and pulmonary sarcoidosis with vanishing bile duct syndrome. Despite initial treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and corticosteroid therapy, the patient exhibited an unexpected exacerbation of liver enzymes, prompting a careful consideration of second-line interventions. Following discussion with a tertiary center and a comprehensive review of the literature, it was determined not to intensify therapy due to an inadequate response. Recognizing the persistent challenge of managing advanced cases and the potential progressive course of the disease, the patient was referred to a tertiary transplant center. Currently, she is under outpatient follow-up, clinical and analytically stable with no targeted therapy.ConclusionThis case report details a rare presentation of hepatic sarcoidosis with an unusual laboratory pattern, emphasizing diagnostic and management challenges in recognizing atypical presentations of hepatic sarcoidosis. The complexity of managing advanced cases warrants a multidisciplinary approach and the limited literature on this subject emphasizes the urgency for a more comprehensive understanding of sarcoidosis to improve diagnostic accuracy and refine therapeutic approaches.
Project description:Lung transplantation (LT) is proved to be effective in patients with end-stage lung disease who are failing optimal therapy. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema) is the most common indication for adult lung transplantation. As most patients with emphysema (EMP) can survive long term, it could be difficult to decide which patient should be listed for LT. LT is a complex surgery. Therefore, it is extremely important to choose a recipient in whom expected survival is at less equal or comparable to the survival without surgery. This paper reviews patient selection, bridging strategies until lung transplantation, surgical approach and choice of the procedure, and functional outcome in emphysema recipients.
Project description:Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) has been prescribed in neuropathic pain management for over 20 years. This study aims to summarize what has been published on the topic in the last 15 years and determine the appropriateness of the prescribing. It describes the pharmacological aspect of PEA, especially focusing on its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Then, it deeply explores why PEA may be useful in the pharmacological management of both neuropathic and mixed pain. Finally, it examines some innovative patent, which aims to address obstacles encountered with conventional PEA formulations, for its pharmacodynamic characteristics. One of them (Equisetum-PEA) seems promising. It partially ameliorates the bioavailability and the targeted distribution. It seems to introduce novel advancements that can potentially enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of PEA in terms of its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and analgesic properties. The deep literature analysis aims to examine the potential advantages of PEA, in the context of several pathological conditions that may benefit from this molecule. It focuses on various published data regarding the clinical efficacy of PEA in managing neuropathic and mixed pain. Also, it tries to understand if it can modernize the field of therapy based on PEA, thus offering a better treatment option for individuals with chronic long-term inflammation, oxidative stress, and neuropathic or mixed pain with a neuropathic component. The study examines the possible impact of PEA on personalized medicine strategies and its potential for translation into clinical practice. It analyses the possibilities that PEA has in enhancing patient outcomes in a range of central nervous system and inflammatory conditions. A complete analysis of the therapeutic potentialities of this product was missing. This extensive narrative review makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing comprehension of PEA therapy. It establishes a foundation for further exploration in research and potential uses in clinical settings.