Evaluating the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Outcomes of Two Methods Involving Patients With Disability in Developing Clinical Guidelines: Crossover Pilot Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Engaging patients and the public in clinical practice guideline (CPG) development is believed to contribute significantly to guideline quality, but the advantages of the various co-design strategies have not been empirically compared, making it difficult to choose one strategy over another.

Objective

This pilot study aims to document the acceptability, feasibility, and outcomes of 2 methods of involving patients in outlining CPG.

Methods

A single-blind crossover pragmatic study was performed with patients with traumatic brain injury. The patients experimented with 2 alternative methods of producing clinical practice recommendations (ie, a discussion group and a wiki). The participants rated the acceptability of the 2 methods, and feasibility was assessed us

SUBMITTER: Lamontagne ME 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8663436 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature