Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs are the standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. If less invasive alternatives to NP swabs (eg, oropharyngeal [OP] or nasal swabs [NS]) are comparably sensitive, the use of these techniques may be preferable in terms of comfort, convenience, and safety.Methods
This study compared the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in swab samples collected on the same day among participants with at least one positive PCR test.Results
Overall, 755 participants had at least one set of paired swabs. Concordance between NP and other swab types was 75% (NS), 72% (OP), 54% (rectal swabs [RS]), and 78% (NS/OP combined). Kappa values were moderate for the NS, OP, and NS/OP comparisons (0.50, 0.45, and 0.54, respectively). Highest sensitivity relative to NP (0.87) was
SUBMITTER: Lantry FJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8689744 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature