Dataset Information

Who makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCT.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare sociodemographic, health- and exercise-related characteristics of participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in an exercise intervention trial during cancer treatment.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were invited to participate in a 6-month exercise intervention. Background data for all respondents (n = 2051) were collected at baseline by questionnaire and medical records. Additional data were collected using an extended questionnaire, physical activity monitors, and fitness testing for trial participants (n = 577). Moreover, a sub-group of decliners (n = 436) consented to additional data collection by an extended questionnaire . Data were analyzed for between-group differences using independent t-tests and chi²-tests.

Results

Trial participants were younger (59 ± 12yrs vs. 64 ± 11yrs, p < .001), more likely to be women (80% vs. 75%, p = .012), and scheduled for chemotherapy treatment (54% vs. 34%, p < .001), compared to decliners (n = 1391). A greater proportion had university education (60% vs 40%, p < .001), reported higher anxiety and fatigue, higher exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations, and less kinesiophobia at baseline compared to decliners. A greater proportion of trial participants were classified as 'not physically active' at baseline; however, within the group who participated, being "physically active" at baseline was associated with trial completion. Completers (n = 410) also reported less kinesiophobia than drop-outs (n = 167).

Conclusion

The recruitment procedures used in comprehensive oncology exercise trials should specifically address barriers for participation among men, patients without university education and older patients. Individualized efforts should be made to enroll patients with low exercise self-efficacy and low outcome expectations of exercise. To retain participants in an ongoing exercise intervention, extra support may be needed for patients with kinesiophobia and those lacking health-enhancing exercise habits at baseline.

SUBMITTER: Strandberg E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8727419 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Who makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCT.

Strandberg Emelie E Bean Christopher C Vassbakk-Svindland Karianne K Brooke Hannah L HL Sjövall Katarina K Börjeson Sussanne S Berntsen Sveinung S Nordin Karin K Demmelmaier Ingrid I

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 20210928 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare sociodemographic, health- and exercise-related characteristics of participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in an exercise intervention trial during cancer treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with newly diagnosed breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were invited to participate in a 6-month exercise intervention. Background data for all respondents (n = 2051) were collected at baseline by questionnaire and medical records. Additional data were collected ...[more]

PMID: 34580784

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe results from the physical training and cancer randomized controlled trial (Phys-Can RCT) indicate that high intensity (HI) strength and endurance training during (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment is more beneficial for cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF, measured as peak oxygen uptake [VO2peak]) than low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) exercise. Adherence to the exercise intervention and demographic or clinical characteristics of patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment may moderate the exercise intervention effect on VO2peak. In this study, the objective was to investigate whether baseline values of VO2peak, body mass index (BMI), time spent in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA), physical fatigue, age, chemotherapy treatment, and the adherence to the endurance training moderated the effect of HI vs. LMI exercise on VO2peak.Materials and methodsWe used data collected from a subsample from the Phys-Can RCT; women who were diagnosed with breast cancer and had a valid baseline and post-intervention VO2peak test were included (n = 255). The exercise interventions from the RCT included strength and endurance training at either LMI, which was continuous endurance training at 40-50% of heart rate reserve (HRR), or at HI, which was interval training at 80-90% of HRR, with similar exercise volume in the two groups. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate moderating effects using a significance level of p < 0.10. Statistically significant interactions were examined further using the Johnson-Neyman (J-N) technique and regions of significance (for continuous variables) or box plots with adjusted means of post-intervention VO2peak (for binary variables).ResultsAge, as a continuous variable, and adherence, dichotomized into < or > 58% based on median, moderated the effect of HI vs. LMI on CRF (B = -0.08, 95% CI [-0.16, 0.01], p interaction = 0.06, and B = 1.63, 95% CI [-0.12, 3.38], p interaction = 0.07, respectively). The J-N technique and regions of significance indicated that the intervention effect (HI vs. LMI) was positive and statistically significant in participants aged 61 years or older. Baseline measurement of CRF, MVPA, BMI, physical fatigue, and chemotherapy treatment did not significantly moderate the intervention effect on CRF.ConclusionWomen with breast cancer who are older and who have higher adherence to the exercise regimen may have larger effects of HI exercise during (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment on CRF.

Project description:BackgroundKnowledge regarding adherence is necessary to improve the specificity of exercise interventions during cancer treatment. We aimed to determine adherence to resistance and endurance training interventions in parallel; identify subgroups with similar adherence characteristics; and examine determinants of these subgroups.MethodsIn the Phys-Can randomised controlled trial, participants (n = 577, 81% women, mean(SD) age 59(12) years, and 50% with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) starting (neo-) adjuvant treatment for breast, colorectal or prostate cancer were randomized to 6-month of high (HI) or low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) supervised, group-based resistance training and individual home-based endurance training, with or without behavior change support. Adherence was calculated as performed exercise volume as a proportion of prescribed exercise volume (0-100%), overall (HI and LMI groups) and for frequency, intensity, type and time (FITT principles) (HI group). Adherence to resistance training was plotted against adherence to endurance training overall and for each FITT principle. K-means cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups with similar adherence characteristics. Potential determinants of subgroup membership were examined using multinomial logistic regression.ResultsWe found a positive curvilinear correlation between adherence to resistance and endurance training overall. A similar correlation was seen for adherence to frequency of resistance vs. endurance training in the HI group. In the HI group, adherence to resistance training intensity and time was > 80% for almost all participants. For endurance training adherence ranged from 0 to 100% for each of the FITT principles. Three clusters were identified, representing low, mixed, and high adherence to resistance and endurance training overall. Participants with higher age (Relative risk ratio [95% CI]; LMI: 0.86[0.77-0.96], HI: 0.83[0.74-0.93]), no behaviour change support (LMI: 0.11[0.02-0.56], HI: 0.20[0.05-0.85]), higher cardiorespiratory fitness (LMI: 0.81[0.69-0.94], HI: 0.80[0.69-0.92]), more fatigue (according to the reduced activity subscale of the MFI questionnaire) (LMI: 0.48[0.31-0.73], HI: 0.69[0.52-0.93]) or higher quality of life (LMI: 0.95[0.90-1.00], HI: 0.93[0.88-0.98]) were less likely to be in the low than the high adherence cluster whether randomised to LMI or HI training. Other determinants were specific to those randomised to LMI or HI training.ConclusionsIn an exercise intervention during cancer treatment, adherence to resistance and endurance training were positively correlated. Personalisation of interventions and additional support for some subgroups of participants may improve adherence. Trial registration NCT02473003 (clinicaltrials.gov, Registered 16/06/2015).

Project description:ObjectiveGlobal interventions on routine immunization aim to achieve at least 90 % immunization coverage of all vaccines as per national immunization schedules, aligning with the Immunization Agenda 2030. Despite significant global progress, regions like Uttar Pradesh (UP), India's most populous state, require more efforts to meet this target.MethodsIn 2021, a quantitative survey was conducted with 10,591 mothers/caregivers of children aged 0-15 months and 479 linked community health workers (Accredited Social Health Activists, ASHAs) responsible for connecting these families with vaccine services across 444 rural villages in UP. We developed a coverage cascade to assess the coverage of all basic vaccines (1 dose of each BCG and MR, and 3 doses each of DPT/Penta and Polio), immunization dropouts, and their drivers.FindingsWhile 96.4 % of service platforms had the required vaccines available and 94.7 % of children aged 12-15 months had received the first dose of Pentavalent vaccine, only 67.8 % of children received all basic vaccines, with 53.5 % completing these vaccines in the first year of life. More than half (53 %) of dropouts were concentrated in 30 % of ASHA areas. Among these areas, 13 % had no dropouts, and 29 % had more than 60 % of children aged 12-15 months with incomplete immunization. Areas with high dropout rates had higher rates of home deliveries, lower possession of parent-held vaccination records (MCP cards), and poor community-level factors such as incomplete record keeping by ASHAs, less supportive supervision by their supervisors, and relatively lower work motivation compared to areas with no dropouts.ConclusionThe wide heterogeneity in immunization coverage and dropouts emphasize the need to identify area-specific patterns and reasons for low immunization coverage and to develop interventions to address them. Robust support systems for community health workers and comprehensive record-keeping are pivotal to improve immunization coverage and to reduce the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Project description:PurposeWhile moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) is associated with various health improvements shortly after completion of exercise interventions, it remains unclear which health benefits can be expected when MVPA levels are maintained in the long term in cancer survivors. We aimed to assess the associations of (1) MVPA level at 12-month follow-up and (2) long-term MVPA patterns (from immediately post-intervention to 12-month follow-up) with different cancer-related health outcomes.MethodsIn the Physical training and Cancer (Phys-Can) RCT, 577 participants diagnosed with breast (78%), prostate (19%), or colorectal (3%) cancer were randomized to 6 months of exercise during curative cancer treatment. Accelerometer-assessed physical activity and outcome data (ie, cancer-related fatigue, health-related quality of life [HRQoL], anxiety and depression, functioning in daily life, cardiorespiratory fitness, sedentary time and sleep) were collected immediately post-intervention and at 12-month follow-up. Based on the sample's median of MVPA immediately post-intervention (65 minutes/day) and the changes between the 2 measurement points, 4 categories with different long-term MVPA patterns were created: High & Increasing, High & Decreasing, Low & Increasing, and Low & Decreasing. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed for the analyses.ResultsA total of 353 participants were included in the analyses. At 12-month follow-up, a higher MVPA level was significantly associated with lower fatigue in 3 domains (general fatigue [β = -.33], physical fatigue [β = -.53] and reduced activity [β = -.37]), higher cardiorespiratory fitness (β = .34) and less sedentary time (β = -.35). For long-term MVPA patterns, compared to the participants in the "Low & Decreasing" category, those in the "High & Increasing" category reported significantly lower fatigue in 3 domains (general fatigue [β = -1.77], physical fatigue [β = -3.36] and reduced activity [β = -1.58]), higher HRQoL (β = 6.84) and had less sedentary time (β = -1.23).ConclusionOur results suggest that long-term physical activity is essential for improving health outcomes post-intervention in cancer survivors. Cancer survivors, including those who reach recommended MVPA levels, should be encouraged to maintain or increase MVPA post-intervention for additional health benefits.Trial registrationNCT02473003 (10/10/2014).

Dataset Information

Who makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCT.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Who makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCT.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets