Dataset Information

Self-Administration of Auricular Acupuncture in Rural Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Project.

ABSTRACT: Expression of Concern: Medical Acupuncture issues an Expression of Concern pertaining to a published article in the October 2021 issue of the journal entitled, "Self-Administration of Auricular Acupuncture in Rural Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Project," by Brian Lee James, John Welch, and Clint Williamson. (Med Acupunct 33(5):2021.349-352; doi: 10.1089/acu.2021.0007) The journal has received communications from several sources raising significant concerns regarding the claims made in this article as they pertain to the self-administration of Battlefield Acupuncture and patient self-use of acupuncture needles. Each communication states that acupuncture needles are considered FDA-approved medical equipment and are not intended for patient self-administration. An official inquiry with the authors' institution has been launched by the editors and publisher of the journal. Such an inquiry may be a protracted process but the journal will update this notice once a resolution has been reached. Objective: There has been little research on self-administration of auricular acupuncture by patients. This study was conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of self-administration of Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) with semipermanent needles at intervals of 2 weeks over a timeperiod of 6 months. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at the Chillicothe Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chillicothe, OH, USA, and its satellite Community-Based Outpatient Clinics in Ohio. The participants were 12 healthy veteran volunteers (10 males and 2 females) who previously had repeated good responses to BFA administration by a provider. Outcomes of treatment-emergent adverse events and subjective perception of pain relief, compared with provider-administered BFA, were collected telephonically every 2 weeks for 6 months. Results: No treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by any participant over a 6-month time period. Of 12 participants,10 (83%) were able to perform BFA on themselves reliably after a didactic session. Pain relief from self-administration experienced by participants was comparable to that experienced when administered by a provider. Conclusions: In this small pilot study, self-administration of BFA was safe and effective for individuals who had previously received repeated benefit from provider-administered BFA. The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. This research is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT #: NCT04208659.

SUBMITTER: James BL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8729899 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Self-Administration of Auricular Acupuncture in Rural Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Project.

James Brian Lee BL Welch John J Williamson Clint C

Medical acupuncture 20211018 5

Expression of Concern: Medical Acupuncture issues an Expression of Concern pertaining to a published article in the October 2021 issue of the journal entitled, "Self-Administration of Auricular Acupuncture in Rural Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Project," by Brian Lee James, John Welch, and Clint Williamson. (Med Acupunct 33(5):2021.349-352; doi: 10.1089/acu.2021.0007) The journal has received communications from several sources raising significant concerns regarding th ...[more]

PMID: 35003503

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is increasingly being used for many conditions including chronic neck pain. However the evidence remains inconclusive, indicating the need for further well-designed research. The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot randomised controlled parallel arm trial, to establish key features required for the design and implementation of a large-scale trial on acupuncture for chronic neck pain. METHODS: Patients whose GPs had diagnosed neck pain were recruited from one general practice, and randomised to receive usual GP care only, or acupuncture (up to 10 treatments over 3 months) as an adjunctive treatment to usual GP care. The primary outcome measure was the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) at 3 months. The primary analysis was to determine the sample size for the full scale study. RESULTS: Of the 227 patients with neck pain identified from the GP database, 28 (12.3%) consenting patients were eligible to participate in the pilot and 24 (10.5%) were recruited to the trial. Ten patients were randomised to acupuncture, receiving an average of eight treatments from one of four acupuncturists, and 14 were randomised to usual GP care alone. The sample size for the full scale trial was calculated from a clinically meaningful difference of 5% on the NPQ and, from this pilot, an adjusted standard deviation of 15.3%. Assuming 90% power at the 5% significance level, a sample size of 229 would be required in each arm in a large-scale trial when allowing for a loss to follow-up rate of 14%. In order to achieve this sample, one would need to identify patients from databases of GP practices with a total population of 230,000 patients, or approximately 15 GP practices roughly equal in size to the one involved in this study (i.e. 15,694 patients). CONCLUSION: This pilot study has allowed a number of recommendations to be made to facilitate the design of a large-scale trial, which in turn will help to clarify the existing evidence base on acupuncture for neck pain.

Project description:Background: Given Canada’s geographically dispersed population, initial trauma care may occur at rural sites that may not manage patients with trauma frequently; thus, telementoring can play a life-saving role. In this article, we describe a rural trauma telementoring pilot program in British Columbia and report the results of an evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses. Methods: Trauma surgeons from a quaternary trauma centre in Vancouver helped facilitate 3 in situ trauma simulation sessions at a rural BC hospital between fall 2019 and summer 2020. The sessions involved 4 physician participants (a trauma surgeon telementor, a family physician with additional expertise in emergency medicine acting as trauma team leader, a family physician with additional expertise in anesthesia and a family physician with Enhanced Surgical Skills), an emergency department nurse, 2 operating room/trauma team nurses, and laboratory and radiology technicians. The sessions involved simulated damage-control procedures and lasted about 2 hours. The participants completed surveys assessing comfort and confidence regarding aspects of trauma care and use of the telehealth unit before and after each session, and the facilitators assessed team dynamics using the Modified Non-Technical Skills for Trauma (T-NOTECHS) tool. Focus groups were held to gather qualitative data, and costs were tracked. Results: The average presimulation confidence survey score was 19.6/30, and the average postsimulation score was 24.0/30. The mean score improved significantly after both the first and second sessions (p = 0.01 and p = 0.004, respectively). Across the 3 sessions, the average T-NOTECHS score improved significantly, from 18.5/25 to 21.5/25 (p = 0.02). Qualitative analysis identified 3 dominant themes: telementoring increased provider confidence, telementoring increased order to the resuscitation procedure and the technical aspects of telementorship. The telementoring program was well received by all participants. Conclusion: A significant improvement was seen across simulations in physician confidence and trauma team dynamics with telementorship support. Telementoring in trauma may provide a way to lessen the difference between rural and urban patient outcomes within Canada’s geographically dispersed population, although further work investigating the impact of its use in real-life patients, as well as barriers to its implementation, is required.

Project description:ImportanceThe opioid crisis creates challenges for cancer pain management. Acupuncture confers clinical benefits for chronic nonmalignant pain, but its effectiveness in cancer survivors remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of electroacupuncture or auricular acupuncture for chronic musculoskeletal pain in cancer survivors.Design, setting, and participantsThe Personalized Electroacupuncture vs Auricular Acupuncture Comparative Effectiveness (PEACE) trial is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted from March 2017 to October 2019 (follow-up completed April 2020) across an urban academic cancer center and 5 suburban sites in New York and New Jersey. Study statisticians were blinded to treatment assignments. The 360 adults included in the study had a prior cancer diagnosis but no current evidence of disease, reported musculoskeletal pain for at least 3 months, and self-reported pain intensity on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).InterventionsPatients were randomized 2:2:1 to electroacupuncture (n = 145), auricular acupuncture (n = 143), or usual care (n = 72). Intervention groups received 10 weekly sessions of electroacupuncture or auricular acupuncture. Ten acupuncture sessions were offered to the usual care group from weeks 12 through 24.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was change in average pain severity score on the BPI from baseline to week 12. Using a gatekeeping multiple-comparison procedure, electroacupuncture and auricular acupuncture were compared with usual care using a linear mixed model. Noninferiority of auricular acupuncture to electroacupuncture was tested if both interventions were superior to usual care.ResultsAmong 360 cancer survivors (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [12.7] years; mean [SD] baseline BPI score, 5.2 [1.7] points; 251 [69.7%] women; and 88 [24.4%] non-White), 340 (94.4%) completed the primary end point. Compared with usual care, electroacupuncture reduced pain severity by 1.9 points (97.5% CI, 1.4-2.4 points; P < .001) and auricular acupuncture reduced by 1.6 points (97.5% CI, 1.0-2.1 points; P < .001) from baseline to week 12. Noninferiority of auricular acupuncture to electroacupuncture was not demonstrated. Adverse events were mild; 15 of 143 (10.5%) patients receiving auricular acupuncture and 1 of 145 (0.7%) patients receiving electroacupuncture discontinued treatments due to adverse events (P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized clinical trial among cancer survivors with chronic musculoskeletal pain, electroacupuncture and auricular acupuncture produced greater pain reduction than usual care. However, auricular acupuncture did not demonstrate noninferiority to electroacupuncture, and patients receiving it had more adverse events.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979574.

Dataset Information

Self-Administration of Auricular Acupuncture in Rural Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Project.

Publications

Self-Administration of Auricular Acupuncture in Rural Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Project.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets