Is it feasible to use a humanoid robot to promote hand hygiene adherence in a hospital setting?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Worlikar H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8749168 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Is it feasible to use a humanoid robot to promote hand hygiene adherence in a hospital setting?
Worlikar H H Vadhiraj V Vyas VV Murray Aoife A O'Connell J J Connolly C C Walsh J C JC O'Keeffe D T DT
Infection prevention in practice 20211118 1
Healthcare associated infections (HCAI) are a prevalent preventable cause of morbidity and mortality. Improving hand hygiene adherence is important for HCAI prevention. In this feasibility study, the objective was to determine if a humanoid robot could act as a novel single reminder intervention to improve hand hygiene adherence in a hospital setting. DAVE, a social humanoid robot, improved hand hygiene adherence at the entrance to a tertiary hospital and outpatient department, which was low at ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Mechanical stimulation is essential in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine for proper tissue maturation. However, conventional dynamic stimulation is typically achieved with uniaxial platforms, which limit functionality due to the oversimplified mechanics compared to the complex mechanical inputs of the human body. In this study, we explore human cell responses to stimulation using a humanoid robot shoulder and a uniaxial platform at equivalent strains. A flexible, biocompatible sensor monitoring in situ strains shows that external maximum forces of 25 N and 50 N during robot abduction-adduction motions lead to strains of approximately 3.5% and 9.5%, respectively. Additionally, we demonstrate in situ cell imaging by utilizing the transparency of the bioreactor membrane. The robot motions significantly enhance cell orientation and induce notable changes in gene and protein expression, particularly within the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, compared to both static and uniaxial stimulation controls. These findings underscore the need to better match human biomechanics in bioreactor platforms to improve tissue engineering outcomes.
2025-07-30 | GSE273566 | GEO
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative efficacy of the World Health Organization 2005 campaign (WHO-5) and other interventions to promote hand hygiene among healthcare workers in hospital settings and to summarize associated information on use of resources.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, CINAHL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Cochrane Library, and the EPOC register (December 2009 to February 2014); studies selected by the same search terms in previous systematic reviews (1980-2009).Review methodsIncluded studies were randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after trials, and interrupted time series studies implementing an intervention to improve compliance with hand hygiene among healthcare workers in hospital settings and measuring compliance or appropriate proxies that met predefined quality inclusion criteria. When studies had not used appropriate analytical methods, primary data were re-analysed. Random effects and network meta-analyses were performed on studies reporting directly observed compliance with hand hygiene when they were considered sufficiently homogeneous with regard to interventions and participants. Information on resources required for interventions was extracted and graded into three levels.ResultsOf 3639 studies retrieved, 41 met the inclusion criteria (six randomised controlled trials, 32 interrupted time series, one non-randomised trial, and two controlled before-after studies). Meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials showed the addition of goal setting to WHO-5 was associated with improved compliance (pooled odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.76; I(2)=81%). Of 22 pairwise comparisons from interrupted time series, 18 showed stepwise increases in compliance with hand hygiene, and all but four showed a trend for increasing compliance after the intervention. Network meta-analysis indicated considerable uncertainty in the relative effectiveness of interventions, but nonetheless provided evidence that WHO-5 is effective and that compliance can be further improved by adding interventions including goal setting, reward incentives, and accountability. Nineteen studies reported clinical outcomes; data from these were consistent with clinically important reductions in rates of infection resulting from improved hand hygiene for some but not all important hospital pathogens. Reported costs of interventions ranged from $225 to $4669 (£146-£3035; €204-€4229) per 1000 bed days.ConclusionPromotion of hand hygiene with WHO-5 is effective at increasing compliance in healthcare workers. Addition of goal setting, reward incentives, and accountability strategies can lead to further improvements. Reporting of resources required for such interventions remains inadequate.
| S-EPMC4517539 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImproving hand hygiene in hospitals is the most efficient method to prevent healthcare-associated infections. The hand hygiene behavior of hospital patients and visitors is not well-researched, although they pose a risk for the transmission of pathogens. Therefore, the present study had three aims: (1) Finding a suitable theoretical model to explain patients' and visitors' hand hygiene practice; (2) Identifying important predictors for their hand hygiene behavior; and (3) Comparing the essential determinants of hand hygiene behavior between healthcare professionals from the literature to our non-professional sample.MethodsIn total N = 1,605 patients and visitors were surveyed on their hand hygiene practice in hospitals. The employed questionnaires were based on three theoretical models: a) the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB); b) the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA); and c) the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. To compare our results to the determinants of healthcare workers' hand hygiene behavior, we searched for studies that used one of the three theoretical models.ResultsAmong patients, 52% of the variance in the hand hygiene behavior was accounted for by the TDF domains, 44% by a modified HAPA model, and 40% by the TPB factors. Among visitors, these figures were 59%, 37%, and 55%, respectively. Two clusters of variables surfaced as being essential determinants of behavior: self-regulatory processes and social influence processes. The critical determinants for healthcare professionals' hand hygiene reported in the literature were similar to the findings from our non-professional sample.ConclusionsThe TDF was identified as the most suitable model to explain patients' and visitors' hand hygiene practices. Patients and visitors should be included in existing behavior change intervention strategies. Newly planned interventions should focus on targeting self-regulatory and social influence processes to improve effectiveness.
| S-EPMC7808666 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHand hygiene is a critical component of infection prevention in healthcare settings. Innovative strategies are required to enhance hand hygiene practices among patients and healthcare workers (HCWs).MethodsThis study was conducted at the Chemotherapy Day Center of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. It comprised three phases: phase 1 involved observational audits of hand hygiene practices among patients and HCWs by infection control nurse (ICN); phase 2 included the installation of 53 pressure sensors on alcohol-based hand rub (AHR) bottles at designated sites to monitor usage; phase 3 introduced the robot named Temi Medic to promote hand hygiene through video broadcasts at strategic locations in the center. The mean counts of pressure sensor-equipped AHR per 100 attendances per day (hereafter referred to as the mean count) across phases 2 and 3 were analyzed.ResultsA total of 2580 patient attended the center from April to September 2023. The ICN observed a significant increase in hand hygiene practices among patients at the entrance and reception area, rising from phase 1 (0.2%, 1/583) and phase 2 (0.5%, 3/656) to phase 3 (5.0%, 33/654) (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the overall hand hygiene compliance among HCWs was 74.1% (1341/1810) throughout the study period. From phase 2 to phase 3, the mean counts of 7 AHR bottles designated for patient use (P1-P7) significantly increased (35 ± 17 vs. 64 ± 24, p < 0.001), as did the 33 AHR bottles shared by both patients and HCWs (207 ± 104 vs. 267 ± 113, p = 0.027). In contrast, there was no significant change in the mean count among the 13 AHR bottles designated for HCWs (H1-H13). The mean count of H1-H13 was significantly higher than that of P1-P7 throughout phases 2 and 3 (214 ± 93 vs. 49 ± 25, p < 0.001), indicating a 4.4-fold difference.ConclusionsWhile HCWs maintained stable hand hygiene compliance, the introduction of the robot significantly improved hand hygiene practices among patients in the chemotherapy day center. This underscores the importance of integrating technology into routine practices to promote infection prevention and control in healthcare settings.
| S-EPMC11663329 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceCurrent guidelines require hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves, but evidence to support this requirement is lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a direct-gloving policy on adherence to infection prevention practices in a hospital setting.Design, setting, and participantsThis mixed-method, multicenter, cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 4 academic centers in Baltimore, Maryland, or Iowa City, Iowa, from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2017. Data analysis was completed April 25, 2019. Participants were 3790 health care personnel (HCP) across 13 hospital units.InterventionHospital units were randomly assigned to direct gloving, with hand hygiene not required before donning gloves (intervention), or to usual care (hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was adherence to the expected practice at room entry and exit. A random sample of HCPs' gloved hands were imprinted on agar plates at entry to contact precautions rooms. The intention-to-treat approach was followed, and all analyses were conducted at the level of the participating unit. Primary and secondary outcomes between treatment groups were assessed using generalized estimating equations with an unstructured working correlation matrix to adjust for clustering; multivariate analysis using generalized estimating equations was conducted to adjust for covariates, including baseline adherence.ResultsIn total, 13 hospital units participated in the trial, and 3790 HCP were observed. Adherence to expected practice was greater in the 6 units with the direct-gloving intervention than in the 7 usual care units (1297 of 1491 [87%] vs 954 of 2299 [41%]; P < .001) even when controlling for baseline hand hygiene rates, unit type, and universal gloving policies (risk ratio [RR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58-1.97). Glove use on entry to contact precautions rooms was also higher in the direct-gloving units (1297 of 1491 [87%] vs 1530 of 2299 [67%]; P = .008. The intervention had no effect on hand hygiene adherence measured at entry to non-contact precautions rooms (951 of 1315 [72%] for usual care vs 1111 of 1688 [66%] for direct gloving; RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91-1.10]) or at room exit (1587 of 1897 [84%] for usual care vs 1525 of 1785 [85%] for direct gloving; RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.07]). The intervention was associated with increased total bacteria colony counts (adjusted incidence RR, 7.13; 95% CI, 3.95-12.85) and greater detection of pathogenic bacteria (adjusted incidence RR, 10.18; 95% CI, 2.13-44.94) on gloves in the emergency department and reduced colony counts in pediatrics units (adjusted incidence RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.63), with no change in either total colony count (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.25] for adult intensive care unit; RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.31-1.10] for hemodialysis unit) or presence of pathogenic bacteria (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.40-2.14] for adult intensive care unit; RR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.15-2.04] for hemodialysis unit) in the other units.Conclusions and relevanceCurrent guidelines require hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves, but evidence to support this requirement is lacking. The findings from this cluster randomized clinical trial indicate that a direct-gloving strategy without prior hand hygiene should be considered by health care facilities.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03119389.
| S-EPMC10603500 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe present research is a qualitative one aiming to determine factors affecting hand-hygiene behavior of the nursing staff in Shariati Hospital of Tehran, Iran.MethodsThis was a qualitative study performed using content analysis approach. Considering the aim of the study, 16 in-depth semi-structured interviews were held with the nursing staff of Shariati Hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. A convenient sampling was performed and continued until data saturation and until no new codes and categories were obtained. Data were analyzed through a qualitative content analysis based on the Graham and landsman method. Directed qualitative content analysis was done in order to analyze the data.ResultsThe results of this study revealed 3 main themes in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control) and 8 main themes in the outside the framework (environment, perceptions, life style, morality, education, organizational culture, salience and personality).ConclusionDue to the other factors also found in this study, an integration of theories and models for designing of interventions is recommended to increase adherence to hand hygiene behavior.
| S-EPMC7689993 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recent developments in robotics have enabled humanoid robots to be used in tasks where they have to physically interact with humans, including robot-supported caregiving. This interaction-referred to as physical human-robot interaction (pHRI)-requires physical contact between the robot and the human body; one way to improve this is to use efficient sensing methods for the physical contact. In this paper, we use a flexible tactile sensing array and integrate it as a tactile skin for the humanoid robot HRP-4C. As the sensor can take any shape due to its flexible property, a particular focus is given on its spatial calibration, i.e., the determination of the locations of the sensor cells and their normals when attached to the robot. For this purpose, a novel method of spatial calibration using B-spline surfaces has been developed. We demonstrate with two methods that this calibration method gives a good approximation of the sensor position and show that our flexible tactile sensor can be fully integrated on a robot and used as input for robot control tasks. These contributions are a first step toward the use of flexible tactile sensors in pHRI applications.
| S-EPMC10181520 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this paper we report results on benchmarking a HRP-2 humanoid robot. The humanoid robots of this serie are known to be very robust. They have been successfully used by several research groups for the design of new motion generation algorithms. As such it is a reference in the category of electrically driven humanoid robot. As new humanoid robots are continuously built it is interesting to compare the performances of these new prototypes to those of HRP-2. This benchmarking study was realized through a campaign of measurements in an advanced equipped testing laboratory that provides a well adapted controlled environment. We have investigated the effect of temperatures variation on the robot walking capabilities. In order to benchmark various environmental conditions and algorithms we computed a set of performance indicators for bipedal locomotion. The scope of the algorithms for motion generation evaluated here ranges from analytical solution to numerical optimization approach, enabling real-time walking or multi-contacts motions.
| S-EPMC7805704 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInconsistent hand hygiene puts people who inject drugs (PWID) at high risk of infectious diseases, in particular skin and soft tissue infections. In healthcare settings, handwashing with alcohol-based hand rubs (ABRH) is recommended before aseptic procedures including intravenous injections. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability, safety and preliminary efficacy of an intervention combining ABHR provision and educational training for PWID.MethodsA mixed-methods design was used including a pre-post quantitative study and a qualitative study. Participants were active PWID recruited in 4 harm reduction programmes of France and followed up for 6 weeks. After baseline assessment, participants received a face-to-face educational intervention. ABHR was then provided throughout the study period. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires at baseline, and weeks 2 (W2) and 6 (W6) post-intervention. Qualitative data were collected through focus groups with participants who completed the 6-week study.ResultsAmong the 59 participants included, 48 (81%) and 43 (73%) attended W2 and W6 visits, respectively. ABHR acceptability was high and adoption rates were 50% (W2) and 61% (W6). Only a minority of participants reported adverse skin reactions (ranging from 2 to 6%). Preliminary efficacy of the intervention was shown through increased hand hygiene frequency (multivariable linear mixed model: coef. W2 = 0.58, p = 0.002; coef. W6 = 0.61, p = 0.002) and fewer self-reported injecting-related infections (multivariable logistic mixed model: AOR W6 = 0.23, p = 0.021). Two focus groups were conducted with 10 participants and showed that young PWID and those living in unstable housing benefited most from the intervention.ConclusionsABHR for hand hygiene prior to injection are acceptable to and safe for PWID, particularly those living in unstable housing. The intervention's educational component was crucial to ensure adoption of safe practices. We also provide preliminary evidence of the intervention's efficacy through increased hand hygiene frequency and a reduced risk of infection.
| S-EPMC7905764 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHealthcare-associated infections are the most frequent adverse events in healthcare worldwide, with limited available evidence suggesting highest burden in resource-limited settings. Recent Ebola epidemics emphasize the disastrous impact that spread of infectious agents within healthcare facilities can have, accentuating the need for improvement of infection control practices. Hand hygiene (HH) measures are considered to be the most effective tool to prevent healthcare-associated infections. However, HH knowledge and compliance are low, especially in vulnerable settings such as Guinea. The aim of PASQUALE (Partnership to Improve Patient Safety and Quality of Care) was to assess knowledge and compliance with HH and improve HH by incorporating the WHO HH Strategy within the Faranah Regional Hospital (FRH), Guinea.MethodsIn a participatory approach, a team of FRH staff and leadership was invited to identify priorities of the hospital prior to the start of PASQUALE. The local hygiene committee was empowered to increase its activities and take ownership of the HH improvement strategy. A baseline assessment of knowledge, perception and compliance was performed months before the intervention. The main intervention consisted of local alcohol-based-hand-rub (ABHR) production, with final product efficacy testing, in conjunction with a training adapted to the needs identified in the baseline assessment. A follow-up assessment was conducted directly after the training. Effectiveness of the intervention was assessed via uncontrolled before-and-after comparison.ResultsBaseline knowledge score (13.0/25) showed a significant increase to 19.0/25 in follow-up. Baseline-Compliance was 23.7% and increased significantly to 71.5% in follow-up. Compliance rose significantly across all professional groups except for midwifes and in all indications for HH, with the largest in the indication "Before aseptic tasks". The increase in compliance was associated with the intervention and remained significant after adjusting for confounders. The local pharmacy successfully supplies the entire hospital. The local supply resulted in a ten-fold increase of monthly hospital disinfectant consumption.ConclusionThe WHO HH strategy is an adaptable and effective method to improve HH knowledge and compliance in a resource-limited setting. Local production is a feasible method for providing self-sufficient supply of ABHR to regional hospitals like the FRH. Participatory approaches like hygiene committee ownership builds confidence of sustainability.
| S-EPMC7227248 | biostudies-literature