Dataset Information

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol in Patients With Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

ABSTRACT: Background Long-term benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of recurrent stroke has not been established in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of DAPT with cilostazol and clopidogrel or aspirin to those of SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis, who were recruited to the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination trial, a randomized controlled trial in high-risk Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. Methods and Results We compared the vascular and hemorrhagic events between DAPT and SAPT in patients with ischemic stroke and symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis of at least 50% in a major intracranial artery. Patients were placed in two groups: 275 were assigned to receive DAPT and 272 patients SAPT. The risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95); and composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.91) were lower in DAPT than SAPT, whereas the risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.12-4.30) did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions DAPT using cilostazol was superior to SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events without increasing bleeding risk among patients with intracranial arterial stenosis after stroke. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370.

SUBMITTER: Uchiyama S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8751870 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol in Patients With Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Uchiyama Shinichiro S Toyoda Kazunori K Omae Katsuhiro K Saita Ryotaro R Kimura Kazumi K Hoshino Haruhiko H Sakai Nobuyuki N Okada Yasushi Y Tanaka Kortaro K Origasa Hideki H Naritomi Hiroaki H Houkin Kiyohiro K Yamaguchi Keiji K Isobe Masanori M Minematsu Kazuo K Matsumoto Masayasu M Tominaga Teiji T Tomimoto Hidekazu H Terayama Yasuo Y Yasuda Satoshi S Yamaguchi Takenori T

Journal of the American Heart Association 20211008 20

Background Long-term benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of recurrent stroke has not been established in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of DAPT with cilostazol and clopidogrel or aspirin to those of SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis, who were recruited to the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination trial, a ra ...[more]

PMID: 34622679

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeAlthough dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel reduces the recurrence of ischemic stroke while significantly increasing the bleeding events compared with monotherapy, the CSPS.com trial (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination) showed that DAPT using cilostazol was more effective without the bleeding risk. In the CSPS.com trial, aspirin or clopidogrel was used as the underlying antiplatelet drug. The effectiveness and safety of each combination were examined and clarified.MethodsIn the CSPS.com trial, a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, patients with high-risk, noncardioembolic ischemic stroke 8 to 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone at the discretion of the physician in charge were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or DAPT using cilostazol and followed for 0.5 to 3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was first recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening bleeding. The analysis was based on the underlying antiplatelet agents.ResultsA total of 763 patients taking aspirin and 1116 taking clopidogrel were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Although the clopidogrel group had more risk factors than the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the DAPT group and the aspirin-monotherapy group. In the clopidogrel group, the primary end point occurred at a rate of 2.31 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 5.19 per 100 patient-years in the clopidogrel-monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.447 [95% CI, 0.258–0.774]). Safety outcome did not differ significantly between groups (0.51 per 100 patient-years versus 0.71 per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.730 [95% CI, 0.206–2.588]).ConclusionsThe combination of cilostazol and clopidogrel significantly reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke without increasing the bleeding risk in noncardioembolic, high-risk patients.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000012180.

Project description:BackgroundAtherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is an important cause of stroke that is increasingly being treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) to prevent recurrent stroke. However, PTAS has not been compared with medical management in a randomized trial.MethodsWe randomly assigned patients who had a recent transient ischemic attack or stroke attributed to stenosis of 70 to 99% of the diameter of a major intracranial artery to aggressive medical management alone or aggressive medical management plus PTAS with the use of the Wingspan stent system. The primary end point was stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment or after a revascularization procedure for the qualifying lesion during the follow-up period or stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days.ResultsEnrollment was stopped after 451 patients underwent randomization, because the 30-day rate of stroke or death was 14.7% in the PTAS group (nonfatal stroke, 12.5%; fatal stroke, 2.2%) and 5.8% in the medical-management group (nonfatal stroke, 5.3%; non-stroke-related death, 0.4%) (P=0.002). Beyond 30 days, stroke in the same territory occurred in 13 patients in each group. Currently, the mean duration of follow-up, which is ongoing, is 11.9 months. The probability of the occurrence of a primary end-point event over time differed significantly between the two treatment groups (P=0.009), with 1-year rates of the primary end point of 20.0% in the PTAS group and 12.2% in the medical-management group.ConclusionsIn patients with intracranial arterial stenosis, aggressive medical management was superior to PTAS with the use of the Wingspan stent system, both because the risk of early stroke after PTAS was high and because the risk of stroke with aggressive medical therapy alone was lower than expected. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; SAMMPRIS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00576693.).

Project description:Background and objectiveSymptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (SICAS) is the most common etiology of ischemic stroke and one of the main causes of high stroke recurrence. The recurrence of stroke is closely related to the prognosis of ischemic stroke. This study aims to develop a machine learning model based on high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) to predict the risk of stroke recurrence in SICAS.MethodsThis study retrospectively collected data from 180 SICAS stroke patients treated at the hospital between 2020.01 and 2022.01. Relevant imaging and clinical data were collected, and follow-up was conducted. The dataset was divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 7:3. We employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to perform a selection on the baseline data, laboratory tests, and neuroimaging data generated by HR-VWI scans collected from the training set. Finally, five machine learning techniques, including logistic regression model (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), Complement naive Bayes (CNB), and k-nearest neighbors algorithm (kNN), were employed to develop a predictive model for stroke recurrence. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) was used to provide visualization and interpretation for each patient. The model's effectiveness was evaluated using average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, f1 score, PR curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.ResultsLASSO analysis revealed that "history of hypertension," "homocysteine level," "NWI value," "stenosis rate," "intracranial hemorrhage," "positive remodeling," and "enhancement grade" were independent risk factors for stroke recurrence in SICAS patients. In 10-fold cross-validation, the area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.813 to 0.912 in ROC curve analysis. The area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) ranged from 0.655 to 0.833, with the Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) model exhibiting the best ability to predict stroke recurrence in SICAS. SHAP analysis provided interpretability for the machine learning model and revealed essential factors related to the risk of stroke recurrence in SICAS.ConclusionA precise machine learning-based prediction model for stroke recurrence in SICAS has been established to assist clinical practitioners in making clinical decisions and implementing personalized treatment measures.

Dataset Information

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol in Patients With Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Publications

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol in Patients With Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets