Dataset Information

Sensitivity of candling as routine method for the detection and recovery of ascaridoids in commercial fish fillets.

ABSTRACT: Ascaridoids are one of the main parasitic hazards in commercial fish. Candling is the current industrial screening method whereby visible ascaridoid larvae are detected on a light table and manually removed. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity (Se) and negative predictive value (NPV) of this method. To make targeted recommendations to the fish industry, the Se was calculated per fish part, larval genus, and fish species. All fish parts (n = 615) were first candled, and larvae were collected, followed by enzymatic digestion to recover the remaining larvae. A fish part was considered positive if at least one larva was detected using candling and/or enzymatic digestion, with both methods combined as reference standard. The overall Se of candling was 31% (95% CI 23-41%) and NPV was 87% (95% CI 85-90%). The Se increased with higher numbers of larvae/100 g infected muscle. A low NPV was found for the belly flaps, therefore we either advise the removal or proper freezing of this part. Lastly, the Se and larval recovery was the highest for the darker and larger Pseudoterranova spp. larvae. Due to the low overall efficacy of candling, further assessment of its cost-benefit and impact on consumers' health risk should be conducted.

SUBMITTER: Mercken E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8789850 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Sensitivity of candling as routine method for the detection and recovery of ascaridoids in commercial fish fillets.

Mercken E E Van Damme I I Šoba B B Vangeenberghe S S Serradell A A De Sterck T T Lumain J P L JPL Gabriël S S

Scientific reports 20220125 1

Ascaridoids are one of the main parasitic hazards in commercial fish. Candling is the current industrial screening method whereby visible ascaridoid larvae are detected on a light table and manually removed. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity (Se) and negative predictive value (NPV) of this method. To make targeted recommendations to the fish industry, the Se was calculated per fish part, larval genus, and fish species. All fish parts (n = 615) were first candled, and larvae wer ...[more]

PMID: 35079033

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background Phenotypic characterization of the prevalent AmpC β-lactamases in clinical isolates is essential for making informed empirical decisions and critical for strengthening antimicrobial stewardship programmes. This study focused on assessing six assays, two in-house and four commercial phenotypic tests for detection of AmpC, to study the feasibility of making its detection a routine diagnostic microbiology laboratory activity. Methods A total of 116 non-duplicate Gram-negative bacteria that were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and resistant or susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam and carbapenems, were screened by cefoxitin discs for AmpC. These isolates were subjected to two in-house (AmpC Tris-EDTA and disc approximation) methods and four commercial tests: D69C AmpC Detection Set; D72C ESBL, AmpC & Carbapenemase Detection Set; combination disc test: ESBL + AmpC Screen Disc Kit; and AmpC MIC Test Strip for confirmation of AmpC production. Ten whole-genome-sequenced AmpC-confirmed Gram-negative isolates were used as positive controls and one as a negative control. Results The prevalence of AmpC β-lactamases was 16%. Escherichia coli was a major carrier of plasmid-mediated AmpC (26.5%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.4%). Phenotypically, 61% of AmpCs were detected by Tris-EDTA (accuracy: 73.8%), 76% by disc approximation (accuracy: 89.2%), 75% by the D69C AmpC Detection Set (accuracy: 95.4%), 74% by the D72C AmpC, ESBL & Carbapenemase Detection Set (accuracy: 95.4%), 76% by the combination disc test (accuracy: 95.4%) and 63% by AmpC MIC Test Strip (accuracy: 87.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of D69C were 97.9% and 88.2%, respectively, and 95.9% and 93.8% for the combination disc test, while for the disc approximation test and D72C they were 93.9% and 75%, and 93.9% and 100%, respectively. Screening by cefoxitin screening was less sensitive (75%) and specific (25%). Disc approximation and the combination disc test detect AmpC in Enterobacterales and also Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. Conclusions We recommend the in-house disc approximation test and the commercial D69C, as well as the combination disc test, as excellent tools for detection of AmpC. The cefoxitin test overcalls AmpC and cannot be considered a good stand-alone test for AmpC detection.

Dataset Information

Sensitivity of candling as routine method for the detection and recovery of ascaridoids in commercial fish fillets.

Publications

Sensitivity of candling as routine method for the detection and recovery of ascaridoids in commercial fish fillets.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets