Recovery of arm function during acute to chronic stage of stroke quantified by kinematics.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To quantify the longitudinal changes in upper limb kinematics within the first year after stroke and to identify the factors that are associated with these changes.Methods
A total of 66 individuals with stroke from the Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT) cohort were included if they were able to perform the target-to-target task. Data from a virtual reality haptic target-to-target task at 6 time-points between 3 days and 12 months after stroke were analysed by linear mixed models, while controlling for the impact of cofactors (stroke severity, age, type and side of stroke, sex and presence of diabetes).Results
Kinematic variables of movement time, mean velocity and number of velocity peaks improved over time and were positively associated with younger age, less severe stroke and ischaemic compared with haemorrhagic stroke. Most of the improvement occurred within 4 weeks after stroke, although movement time and number of velocity peaks also improved between 3 and 6 months after stroke.Conclusion
Kinematic variables of movement time, mean velocity and number of velocity peaks were effective in quantifying the longitudinal changes in upper limb kinematics within the first year after stroke.
SUBMITTER: Hussain N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8814892 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Recovery of arm function during acute to chronic stage of stroke quantified by kinematics.
Hussain Netha N Sunnerhagen Katharina S KS Alt Murphy Margit M
Journal of rehabilitation medicine 20210326 3
<h4>Objective</h4>To quantify the longitudinal changes in upper limb kinematics within the first year after stroke and to identify the factors that are associated with these changes.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 66 individuals with stroke from the Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT) cohort were included if they were able to perform the target-to-target task. Data from a virtual reality haptic target-to-target task at 6 time-points between 3 days and 12 months afte ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundReduction of compensation and improved movement quality indicate recovery after stroke. Since clinical measures alone are often inadequate to distinguish between behavioral recovery and compensation, kinematic analysis of functional tasks has been recommended.ObjectiveTo quantify longitudinal changes and residual deficits in movement performance and quality during the first year after stroke using kinematic analysis of drinking task.MethodsA total of 56 participants with first ever stroke causing upper extremity impairment were extracted from a non-selected stroke unit cohort (Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg-SALGOT). Participants needed to able to perform the drinking task with the more-affected arm at least on 2 occasions out of 6 (3 days, 10 days, 4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months) during the first year to be included. A cohort of 60 healthy individuals was used as reference. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed models.ResultsMovement time, number of movement units, peak angular velocity of the elbow, peak hand velocity, and trunk displacement improved significantly over the first 3 months with a peak at 6 months. Movement time and peak hand velocity reached levels comparable to healthy at 3 months, but number of movement units, peak elbow angular velocity, trunk displacement, and arm abduction remained different from healthy over the first year after stroke.ConclusionsEven when the recovery patterns of kinematics follow the known nonlinear pattern, not all kinematic measures reach the levels in par with healthy controls at one year post stroke. Since the number of movement units, peak angular velocity, trunk displacement, and arm abduction remained impaired over the first year, they might be the most suited measures to distinguish behavioral recovery from compensation strategies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials: NCT01115348. 4 May 2010. Retrospectively registered.
| S-EPMC7296942 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCurrent approaches to characterizing deficits in upper limb movements after stroke typically focus either on changes in a functional measure, for example, how well a patient can complete a task, or changes in impairment, for example, isolated measurements of joint range of motion. However, there can be notable dissociations between static measures of impairment versus those of function.ObjectiveWe develop a method to measure upper limb joint angles during performance of a functional task and use measurements to characterize joint impairment in the context of a functional task.MethodsWe developed a sensorized glove that can precisely measure select finger, hand, and arm joints while participants complete a functional reach-to-grasp task involving manipulation of a sensorized object.ResultsWe first characterized the accuracy and precision of the glove's joint angle measurements. We then measured joint angles in neurologically intact participants (n = 4 participants, 8 limbs) to define the expected distribution of joint angle variation during task execution. These distributions were used to normalize finger, hand, and arm joint angles in stroke participants (n = 6) as they performed the task. We present a participant-specific visualization of functional joint angle variance which illustrated that stroke participants with nearly identical clinical scores exhibited unique patterns of joint angle variation.ConclusionsOverall, measuring individual joint angles in the context of a functional task may inform whether changes in functional scores over recovery or rehabilitation are driven by changes in impairment or the development of compensatory strategies, and provide a quantified path toward personalized rehabilitative therapy.
| S-EPMC10330436 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Robot-based rehabilitation for persons post-stroke may improve arm function and daily-life activities as measured by clinical scales, but its effects on motor strategies during functional tasks are still poorly investigated. This study aimed at assessing the effects of robot-therapy versus arm-specific physiotherapy in persons post-stroke on motor strategies derived from upper body instrumented kinematic analysis, and on arm function measured by clinical scales. METHODS:Forty persons in the sub-acute and chronic stage post-stroke were recruited. This sample included all those subjects, enrolled in a larger bi-center study, who underwent instrumented kinematic analysis and who were randomized in Center 2 into Robot (R_Group) and Control Group (C_Group). R_Group received robot-assisted training. C_Group received arm-specific treatment delivered by a physiotherapist. Pre- and post-training assessment included clinical scales and instrumented kinematic analysis of arm and trunk during a virtual untrained task simulating the transport of an object onto a shelf. Instrumented outcomes included shoulder/elbow coordination, elbow extension and trunk sagittal compensation. Clinical outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of Upper Extremity (FM-UE), modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). RESULTS:R_Group showed larger post-training improvements of shoulder/elbow coordination (Cohen's d = - 0.81, p = 0.019), elbow extension (Cohen's d = - 0.71, p = 0.038), and trunk movement (Cohen's d = - 1.12, p = 0.002). Both groups showed comparable improvements in clinical scales, except proximal muscles MAS that decreased more in R_Group (Cohen's d = - 0.83, p = 0.018). Ancillary analyses on chronic subjects confirmed these results and revealed larger improvements after robot-therapy in the proximal portion of FM-UE (Cohen's d = 1.16, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS:Robot-assisted rehabilitation was as effective as arm-specific physiotherapy in reducing arm impairment (FM-UE) in persons post-stroke, but it was more effective in improving motor control strategies adopted during an untrained task involving vertical movements not practiced during training. Specifically, robot therapy induced larger improvements of shoulder/elbow coordination and greater reduction of abnormal trunk sagittal movements. The beneficial effects of robot therapy seemed more pronounced in chronic subjects. Future studies on a larger sample should be performed to corroborate present findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION:www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03530358. Registered 21 May 2018. Retrospectively registered.
| S-EPMC6990497 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundStudies demonstrate that most arm motor recovery occurs within three months after stroke, when measured with standard clinical scales. Improvements on these measures, however, reflect a combination of recovery in motor control, increases in strength, and acquisition of compensatory strategies.ObjectiveTo isolate and characterize the time course of recovery of arm motor control over the first year poststroke.MethodsLongitudinal study of 18 participants with acute ischemic stroke. Motor control was evaluated using a global kinematic measure derived from a 2-dimensional reaching task designed to minimize the need for antigravity strength and prevent compensation. Arm impairment was evaluated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE), activity limitation with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and strength with biceps dynamometry. Assessments were conducted at: 1.5, 5, 14, 27, and 54 weeks poststroke.ResultsMotor control in the paretic arm improved up to week 5, with no further improvement beyond this time point. In contrast, improvements in the FMA-UE, ARAT, and biceps dynamometry continued beyond 5 weeks, with a similar magnitude of improvement between weeks 5 and 54 as the one observed between weeks 1.5 and 5.ConclusionsRecovery after stroke plateaued much earlier for arm motor control, isolated with a global kinematic measure, compared to motor function assessed with clinical scales. This dissociation between the time courses of kinematic and clinical measures of recovery may be due to the contribution of strength improvement to the latter. Novel interventions, focused on the first month poststroke, will be required to exploit the narrower window of spontaneous recovery for motor control.
| S-EPMC5434710 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMost motor function improvements in people who have experienced strokes occur within the first 3 months. However, individuals showing complete or nearly complete arm function recovery, as assessed using clinical scales, still show certain movement kinematic deficits at 3 months, post-stroke. This study evaluated the changes in upper extremity kinematics, in individuals demonstrating minor clinical motor impairments, 3-12 months post-stroke, and also examined the association between kinematics and the subjects's self-perceived hand abilities during the chronic stage, 12 months post-stroke.MethodsForty-two subjects recovering from strokes and having Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor assessment scores ≥60 were included from the Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT). Kinematic analyses of a drinking task, performed 3, 6, and 12 months post-stroke, were compared with kinematic analyses performed in 35 healthy controls. The Stroke Impact Scale-Hand domain was evaluated at the 12-month follow-up.ResultsThere were no significant changes in kinematic performance between 3 and 12 months, post-stroke. The patients recovering from stroke showed lower peak elbow extension velocities, and increased shoulder abduction and trunk displacement during drinking than did healthy controls, at all time points. At 12 months, post-stroke, better self-perceived arm functions correlated with improved trunk displacements, movement times, movement units, and time to peak velocity percentages.ConclusionKinematic movement deficits, observed at 3 months post-stroke, remained unchanged at 12 months. Movement kinematics were associated with the patient's self-perceived ability to use their more affected hand.Trial registrationClinicalTrials: NCT01115348 .
| S-EPMC6052713 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine if clinical evaluations of post-stroke arm function correspond to everyday motor performance indexed by arm accelerometers.DesignCross-sectional study analyzing baseline data from a larger trial (NCT02665052).SettingOutpatient research center.ParticipantsTwenty community-dwelling adults with chronic arm motor deficits (stroke≥6mo).Intervention72-hours of home wrist-worn accelerometry during normal routine.Main outcome measuresClinical evaluations included the Fugl-Meyer (FM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and two self-assessments: the Motor Activity Log (MAL) and hand motor subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Accelerometer-derived variables included quantifications of movement intensity (magnitude) and duration of arm use.ResultsParticipants had moderate arm impairment (FM 36.1 ± 9.4). The accelerometer-derived mean magnitude ratio correlated significantly with the FM (ρ = 0.60, p < 0.01), WMFT functional score (ρ = 0.59, p < 0.01), and ARAT (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.05). The hours of use ratio correlated with the MAL amount of use (ρ = 0.58, p < 0.01) and quality of movement (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.01). Total paretic hours did not correlate with the FM, WMFT or ARAT, and intensity variables did not correlate with the MAL or SIS.ConclusionsParticipants with higher baseline function had greater intensity of paretic arm movement at home; similarly, those who perceived they had less disability used their paretic arm more relative to their non-paretic arm. However, some participants with higher clinical scores did not exhibit greater arm use in everyday life, possibly due to neglect and learned non-use. Therefore, individualized home accelerometry profiles could provide valuable insight to better tailor post-stroke rehabilitation.
| S-EPMC7739859 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposePerformance status (PS) is a key factor in oncologic decision making, but conventional scales used to measure PS vary among observers. Consumer-grade biometric sensors have previously been identified as objective alternatives to the assessment of PS. Here, we investigate how one such biometric sensor can be used during a clinic visit to identify patients who are at risk for complications, particularly unexpected hospitalizations that may delay treatment or result in low physical activity. We aim to provide a novel and objective means of predicting tolerability to chemotherapy.MethodsThirty-eight patients across three centers in the United States who were diagnosed with a solid tumor with plans for treatment with two cycles of highly emetogenic chemotherapy were included in this single-arm, observational prospective study. A noninvasive motion-capture system quantified patient movement from chair to table and during the get-up-and-walk test. Activity levels were recorded using a wearable sensor over a 2-month period. Changes in kinematics from two motion-capture data points pre- and post-treatment were tested for correlation with unexpected hospitalizations and physical activity levels as measured by a wearable activity sensor.ResultsAmong 38 patients (mean age, 48.3 years; 53% female), kinematic features from chair to table were the best predictors for unexpected health care encounters (area under the curve, 0.775 ± 0.029) and physical activity (area under the curve, 0.830 ± 0.080). Chair-to-table acceleration of the nonpivoting knee (t = 3.39; P = .002) was most correlated with unexpected health care encounters. Get-up-and-walk kinematics were most correlated with physical activity, particularly the right knee acceleration (t = -2.95; P = .006) and left arm angular velocity (t = -2.4; P = .025).ConclusionChair-to-table kinematics are good predictors of unexpected hospitalizations, whereas the get-up-and-walk kinematics are good predictors of low physical activity.
| S-EPMC7328110 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundArm-hand rehabilitation programs applied in stroke rehabilitation frequently target specific populations and thus are less applicable in heterogeneous patient populations. Besides, changes in arm-hand function (AHF) and arm-hand skill performance (AHSP) during and after a specific and well-described rehabilitation treatment are often not well evaluated.MethodThis single-armed prospective cohort study featured three subgroups of stroke patients with either a severely, moderately or mildly impaired AHF. Rehabilitation treatment consisted of a Concise_Arm_and_hand_ Rehabilitation_Approach_in_Stroke (CARAS). Measurements at function and activity level were performed at admission, clinical discharge, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after clinical discharge.ResultsEighty-nine stroke patients (M/F:63/23; mean age:57.6yr (+/-10.6); post-stroke time:29.8 days (+/-20.1)) participated. All patients improved on AHF and arm-hand capacity during and after rehabilitation, except on grip strength in the severely affected subgroup. Largest gains occurred in patients with a moderately affected AHF. As to self-perceived AHSP, on average, all subgroups improved over time. A small percentage of patients declined regarding self-perceived AHSP post-rehabilitation.ConclusionsA majority of stroke patients across the whole arm-hand impairment severity spectrum significantly improved on AHF, arm-hand capacity and self-perceived AHSP. These were maintained up to one year post-rehabilitation. Results may serve as a control condition in future studies.
| S-EPMC5470733 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesStroke patients suffer from ankle joint deformities due to spastic ankle muscles. This study evaluated the viability of using 3D scanned surface images of the feet of stroke victims to visually assess the deformities of a hemiparetic foot and investigated the influences of deformed ankle joints on gait kinematics.MethodsA total of 30 subjects with stroke-induced hemiparesis and 11 age-matched healthy controls completed the clinical assessments. We analyzed their feet's morphometric characteristics using a 3D scanner, identified convenient anthropometric measurements, and conducted gait trials on even and uneven terrains. The 3D foot morphometric characteristics were evaluated using the geometric morphometrics method (GMM).ResultsResults showed that there were significant differences in bilateral foot shapes between the chronic stroke patients and healthy controls and between the paretic and non-paretic sides in the chronic stroke patients. In stroke patients, those with the smaller medial malleoli's vertical tilt angles showed significantly different ankle ranges of motion of dorsi-/plantar flexion during gaits on uneven terrains (p = 0.009). In addition, those with the greater medial malleoli's vertical tilt angles showed significantly different ankle ranges of motion of inversion/eversion during gaits on even and uneven terrains (p < 0.05).ConclusionUsing 3D scanning technology, bilateral morphometric changes in the feet of chronic stroke patients were shown by GMM and the simple anthropometric measurements identified its shape deformities in the feet. Their possible effects on gait kinematics while walking on uneven terrains were investigated. Current methodology can be potentially useful in applying conventional productions of clinically manufactured, patient-fitted ankle-foot-orthosis in orthotics and prosthetics, and in detecting various unidentified pathological deformities in the feet.
| S-EPMC9947404 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that cognitive demands influence motor performance during recovery from acute stroke, we tested patients with acute stroke on 2 motor tasks with different cognitive demands and related task performance to cognitive impairment and neuroanatomic injury.MethodsWe assessed the contralesional and ipsilesional upper extremities of a cohort of 50 patients with weakness after unilateral acute ischemic stroke at 3 time points with 2 tasks: the Box & Blocks Test, a task with greater cognitive demand, and Grip Strength, a simple and ballistic motor task. We compared performance on the 2 tasks, related motor performance to cognitive dysfunction, and used voxel-based lesion symptom mapping to determine neuroanatomic sites associated with motor performance.ResultsConsistent across contralesional and ipsilesional upper extremities and most pronounced immediately after stroke, Box & Blocks scores were significantly more impaired than Grip Strength scores. The presence of cognitive dysfunction significantly explained up to 33% of variance in Box & Blocks performance but was not associated with Grip Strength performance. While Grip Strength performance was associated with injury largely restricted to sensorimotor regions, Box & Blocks performance was associated with broad injury outside sensorimotor structures, particularly the dorsal anterior insula, a region known to be important for complex cognitive function.ConclusionsTogether, these results suggest that cognitive demands influence upper extremity motor performance during recovery from acute stroke. Our findings emphasize the integrated nature of motor and cognitive systems and suggest that it is critical to consider cognitive demands during motor testing and neurorehabilitation after stroke.
| S-EPMC8205451 | biostudies-literature