Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective.

Methods

This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry.

Results

Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO2) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO2 values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05).

Conclusions

As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock.

Trial registration

NCT03193164; NCT03815994. Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/).

SUBMITTER: Lago AF 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8853464 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial.

Lago Alessandra Fabiane AF   Basile-Filho Anibal A   de Oliveira Anamaria Siriani AS   de Souza Hugo Celso Dutra HCD   Dos Santos Daniele Oliveira DO   Gastaldi Ada Clarice AC  

PloS one 20220217 2


<h4>Background</h4>Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspe  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5944671 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6535900 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9687927 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9080168 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8460078 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6486051 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7054544 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9658571 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6486105 | biostudies-literature
2022-07-12 | E-MTAB-7581 | biostudies-arrayexpress