Dataset Information

FGFR2/3 genomic alterations and response to Enfortumab Vedotin in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) is approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) progressing post-platinum and PD1/L1 inhibitor therapy. Erdafitinib is approved for post-platinum mUC with activating somatic genomic alterations (GAs) in FGFR2/3. Information on the activity of EV in mUC with FGFR2/3 alterations will facilitate optimal clinical management. In this multi-center, retrospective analysis, we assessed the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) to EV in mUC patients with and without FGFR2/3 GAs including mutations and fusions. Multivariable cox-regression and logistic regression analyses with 2-tailed p-values were used to evaluate the association of GAs with outcomes. A majority of the evaluable 60 patients were male (44/60, 78%), exhibited ECOG performance score 0-1 (53/60, 88.3%) and had a median age of 70.5 (range 48 - 88) years when starting EV. GAs in FGFR2/3 did not influence the ORR (p=0.32), OS (p=0.79) or PFS (p = 0.32) with EV. In conclusion, FGFR2/3 GAs did not appear to compromise major outcomes with EV in mUC. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the impact of FGFR2/3 GAs on the activity of EV and the optimal sequencing of EV and erdafitinib in mUC.

SUBMITTER: Adib E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8880907 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

FGFR2/3 genomic alterations and response to Enfortumab Vedotin in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Adib Elio E El Zarif Talal T Jain Rohit K RK Skelton William P WP Freeman Dory D Curran Catherine C Akl Elie E Nassar Amin H AH Ravi Praful P Mantia Charlene C Kwiatkowski David J DJ Choueiri Toni K TK Sonpavde Guru G

BJUI compass 20211110 2

Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) is approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) progressing post-platinum and PD1/L1 inhibitor therapy. Erdafitinib is approved for post-platinum mUC with activating somatic genomic alterations (GAs) in <i>FGFR2/3</i>. Information on the activity of EV in mUC with <i>FGFR2/3</i> alterations will facilitate optimal clinical management. In this multi-center, retrospective analysis, we assessed the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective re ...[more]

PMID: 35224552

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients with advanced urothelial carcinoma have poor overall survival after platinum-containing chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor treatment.MethodsWe conducted a global, open-label, phase 3 trial of enfortumab vedotin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy and had had disease progression during or after treatment with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or investigator-chosen chemotherapy (standard docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinflunine), administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival.ResultsA total of 608 patients underwent randomization; 301 were assigned to receive enfortumab vedotin and 307 to receive chemotherapy. As of July 15, 2020, a total of 301 deaths had occurred (134 in the enfortumab vedotin group and 167 in the chemotherapy group). At the prespecified interim analysis, the median follow-up was 11.1 months. Overall survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (median overall survival, 12.88 vs. 8.97 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.89; P = 0.001). Progression-free survival was also longer in the enfortumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (median progression-free survival, 5.55 vs. 3.71 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75; P<0.001). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (93.9% in the enfortumab vedotin group and 91.8% in the chemotherapy group); the incidence of events of grade 3 or higher was also similar in the two groups (51.4% and 49.8%, respectively).ConclusionsEnfortumab vedotin significantly prolonged survival as compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had previously received platinum-based treatment and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. (Funded by Astellas Pharma US and Seagen; EV-301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03474107.).

Project description:ImportanceMetastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) presents a therapeutic challenge with poor outcome. Enfortumab vedotin has emerged as a promising treatment, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation of its effectiveness and safety.ObjectiveTo synthesize the available evidence on enfortumab vedotin, both as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, as an mUC treatment for the purpose of guiding clinical decision-making and future research.Data sourcesCochrane Library, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to August 31, 2024. Major conference abstracts from 2019 to 2024 were also included. Search strategy used a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and free-text keywords related to mUC and enfortumab vedotin.Study selectionRandomized clinical trials and prospective studies investigating enfortumab vedotin in adult patients with mUC were included. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. The meta-analysis used a random effects model, while a network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and 1-year survival rate.ResultsThe 11 included studies (3 randomized clinical trials [27.3%] and 8 nonrandomized prospective studies [72.7%]) involved 2128 patients. Of these patients, 563 (26.5%) received enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, 814 (38.3%) received enfortumab vedotin without pembrolizumab, and 751 (35.3%) received chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was associated with a pooled DCR of 86% (95% CI, 83%-89%), ORR of 68% (95% CI, 64%-71%), and a 1-year survival rate of 79% (95% CI, 75%-82%). Enfortumab vedotin monotherapy had a pooled DCR of 73% (95% CI, 70%-76%), ORR of 43% (95% CI, 40%-47%), and a 1-year survival rate of 52% (95% CI, 48%-56%). Network meta-analysis revealed that enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab significantly outperformed chemotherapy in ORR (odds ratio [OR], 3.47; 95% CI, 1.49-8.09; P = .004) and 1-year survival (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.75-3.06; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed high response rates in first-line settings, while enfortumab vedotin monotherapy was associated with clinical benefit in later lines of therapy. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment approaches, and future research is warranted to refine enfortumab vedotin-based therapies for mUC management.

Project description:BackgroundTreatment options for patients with urothelial cancer (UC) refractory to platinum and immunotherapy are limited and survival is short. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a monoclonal anti-NECTIN4 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin. It was recently approved because of superior survival in comparison to standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy. Real-world patients, however, often have worse characteristics than patients included in clinical trials.ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of EV in a cohort of real-world patients.Design setting and participantsRetrospective data were collected from 23 hospitals and private practices for patients with metastatic and previously treated UC who received EV either when reimbursed by their insurance company before European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval, within a compassionate use program, or as SOC treatment after EMA approval. Imaging and therapy management were in accordance with local standards.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisAdverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Objective responses were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results and limitationsThe median age for the 125 eligible patients was 66 yr (range 31-89). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 0-1 for 76.0%, 2-4 for 13.6%, and unknown for 10.4% of patients. EV was administered in the fourth or later line for 44.8% of patients. The overall response rate was 41.6% (partial response 39.2%, complete response 2.4%). Median OS was 10.0 months (mo) (95% confidence interval 7.20-12.80) and median PFS was 5.0 mo (95% confidence interval 4.34-5.67). For patients with ECOG PS of 0-1, median OS was 14 mo. Any-grade AEs were observed in 67.2% and CTCAE grade ≥3 AEs in 30.4%. The most common AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy and skin toxicity. Three fatal events (pneumonia, pneumonitis) occurred. Limitations include the retrospective design and short follow-up.ConclusionsAdministration of EV for real-world patients was feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile. No new safety signals were reported. Antitumor activity in our cohort was comparable to data previously reported for trials. In summary, our results support the use of EV in patients with metastatic UC.Patient summaryEnfortumab vedotin is a medication that improved the survival of patients with bladder cancer in comparison to standard chemotherapy in clinical trials. However, patients included in clinical trials are highly selected and results for toxicities and improvements in survival do not always transfer to the real-world setting. We analyzed data for 125 patients who were treated with enfortumab vedotin. Our results are comparable to the outcomes from clinical trials regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Dataset Information

FGFR2/3 genomic alterations and response to Enfortumab Vedotin in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Publications

FGFR2/3 genomic alterations and response to Enfortumab Vedotin in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets