Dataset Information

Barriers to healthcare and self-reported adverse outcomes for autistic adults: a cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Autistic people experience poor physical and mental health along with reduced life expectancy compared with non-autistic people. Our aim was to identify self-reported barriers to primary care access by autistic adults compared with non-autistic adults and to link these barriers to self-reported adverse health consequences.

Design

Following consultation with the autistic community at an autistic conference, Autscape, we developed a self-report survey, which we administered online through social media platforms.

Setting

A 52-item, international, online survey.

Participants

507 autistic adults and 157 non-autistic adults.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Self-reported barriers to accessing healthcare and associated adverse health outcomes.

Results

Eighty per cent of autistic adults and 37% of non-autistic respondents reported difficulty visiting a general practitioner (GP). The highest-rated barriers by autistic adults were deciding if symptoms warrant a GP visit (72%), difficulty making appointments by telephone (62%), not feeling understood (56%), difficulty communicating with their doctor (53%) and the waiting room environment (51%). Autistic adults reported a preference for online or text-based appointment booking, facility to email in advance the reason for consultation, the first or last clinic appointment and a quiet place to wait. Self-reported adverse health outcomes experienced by autistic adults were associated with barriers to accessing healthcare. Adverse outcomes included untreated physical and mental health conditions, not attending specialist referral or screening programmes, requiring more extensive treatment or surgery due to late presentations and untreated potentially life-threatening conditions. There were no significant differences in difficulty attending, barriers experienced or adverse outcomes between formally diagnosed and self-identified autistic respondents.

Conclusions

Reduction of healthcare inequalities for autistic people requires that healthcare providers understand autistic perspectives, communication needs and sensory sensitivities. Adjustments for autism-specific needs are as necessary as ramps for wheelchair users.

SUBMITTER: Doherty M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8883251 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Barriers to healthcare and self-reported adverse outcomes for autistic adults: a cross-sectional study.

Doherty Mary M Neilson Stuart S O'Sullivan Jane J Carravallah Laura L Johnson Mona M Cullen Walter W Shaw Sebastian C K SCK

BMJ open 20220222 2

<h4>Objectives</h4>Autistic people experience poor physical and mental health along with reduced life expectancy compared with non-autistic people. Our aim was to identify self-reported barriers to primary care access by autistic adults compared with non-autistic adults and to link these barriers to self-reported adverse health consequences.<h4>Design</h4>Following consultation with the autistic community at an autistic conference, <i>Autscape</i>, we developed a self-report survey, which we adm ...[more]

PMID: 35193921

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhether patients' reports of gaps in care coordination reflect clinically significant problems is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine any association between patient-reported gaps in care coordination and patient-reported preventable adverse outcomes.Design and participantsWe administered a cross-sectional survey on experiences with healthcare to participants in the national Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who were ≥ 65 years old. Of the 15,817 participants in REGARDS at the time of our survey (August 2017-November 2018), 11,138 completed the survey. We restricted the sample to participants who reported ≥ 2 ambulatory visits and ≥ 2 ambulatory providers in the past year (N = 7568).Main measuresWe considered 7 gaps in ambulatory care coordination, elicited with previously validated questions. We considered 4 outcomes: (1) a test that was repeated because the doctor did not have the result of the first test, (2) a drug-drug interaction that occurred due to multiple prescribers, (3) an emergency department visit that could have been prevented by better communication among providers, and (4) a hospital admission that could have been prevented by better communication among providers. We used logistic regression to determine the association between ≥ 1 gap in care coordination and ≥ 1 preventable outcome, adjusting for potential confounders.Key resultsThe average age of the sample was 77.0 years; 55% were female, and 34% were African-American. More than one-third of participants (38.1%) reported ≥ 1 gap in care coordination and nearly one-tenth (9.8%) reported ≥ 1 preventable outcome. Having ≥ 1 gap in care coordination was associated with an increased odds of ≥ 1 preventable outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1.55; 95% confidence interval 1.33, 1.81).ConclusionsParticipants' reports of gaps in care coordination were associated with an increased odds of preventable adverse outcomes. Future interventions should leverage patients' observations to detect and resolve gaps in care coordination.

Project description:BackgroundOlder adults see multiple outpatient providers and increasingly use home health care (HHC) services. Previous studies attempting to draw inferences about the association between HHC use and patient outcomes have been mixed. Whether HHC is associated with care coordination and how both influence outcomes are unknown. In addition, prior studies have not taken the patient perspective into account. We examined the association between receiving HHC and self-reported gaps in care coordination and separately, preventable adverse outcomes.MethodsThe analysis for this cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2021 and June 2022, using data on 4296 Medicare beneficiaries from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who completed a survey on care coordination from 2017 to 2018. The associations between the receipt of HHC and two outcomes (a gap in care coordination, and separately, a preventable adverse event) were examined with Poisson models with robust standard errors. Potential confounders were accounted for through propensity score-based inverse probability weighting.ResultsAmong 4296 participants, 430 (10%) received HHC and they were older and had more comorbidities and ambulatory visits than those without HHC. HHC was not associated with differences in self-reported gaps in care coordination (33.3% HHC vs. 32.5% no-HHC, p = 0.70). HHC recipients reported more preventable drug-drug interactions (9.1% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) but not more preventable ED visits or hospital admissions. In IPW-adjusted models, HHC was not associated with gaps in care coordination (p = 0.60) but was associated with double the risk of a preventable adverse outcome (aRR 2.06; CI: 1.37, 3.10, p < 0.001).ConclusionsHHC recipients were significantly more likely (than those without HHC) to report a potentially preventable adverse event (particularly a drug-drug interaction), suggesting an opportunity to improve patient safety by leveraging the observations of older adults receiving HHC.

Project description:BackgroundSelf-reported scales and objective measurement tools are used to evaluate self-perceived and objective knowledge of evidence-based practice (EBP). Agreement between self-perceived and objective knowledge of EBP terminology has not been widely investigated among healthcare students.AimThe aim of this study was to examine agreement between self-reported and objectively assessed knowledge of EBP terminology among healthcare students. A secondary objective was to explore this agreement between students with different levels of EBP exposure.MethodsStudents in various healthcare disciplines and at different academic levels from Norway (n = 336) and Canada (n = 154) were invited to answer the Terminology domain items of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile (EBP2) questionnaire (self-reported), an additional item of 'evidence based practice' and six random open-ended questions (objective). The open-ended questions were scored on a five-level scoring rubric. Interrater agreement between self-reported and objective items was investigated with weighted kappa (Kw). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate overall agreement.ResultsMean self-reported scores varied across items from 1.99 ('forest plot') to 4.33 ('evidence-based practice'). Mean assessed open-ended answers varied from 1.23 ('publication bias') to 2.74 ('evidence-based practice'). For all items, mean self-reported knowledge was higher than that assessed from open-ended answers (p<0.001). Interrater agreement between self-reported and assessed open-ended items varied (Kw = 0.04-0.69). The overall agreement for the EBP2 Terminology domain was poor (ICC = 0.29). The self-reported EBP2 Terminology domain discriminated between levels of EBP exposure.ConclusionAn overall low agreement was found between healthcare students' self-reported and objectively assessed knowledge of EBP terminology. As a measurement tool, the EBP2 Terminology scale may be useful to differentiate between levels of EBP exposure. When using the scale as a discriminatory tool, for the purpose of academic promotion or clinical certification, users should be aware that self-ratings would be higher than objectively assessed knowledge.

Dataset Information

Barriers to healthcare and self-reported adverse outcomes for autistic adults: a cross-sectional study.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Barriers to healthcare and self-reported adverse outcomes for autistic adults: a cross-sectional study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets