Dataset Information

Reproducibility and validity of diet quality scores derived from food-frequency questionnaires.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Diet quality scores (DQSs) are frequently used to study diet-disease relations but the validity of these scores derived from FFQs has rarely been evaluated.

Objectives

To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of 6 commonly used DQSs derived from the FFQ, including the Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial score, alternative Mediterranean diet score, and 3 plant-based diet indices (overall, healthful, and unhealthful).

Methods

This analysis included 1394 participants from the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study (N = 652) and the Women's Lifestyle Validation Study (N = 742). Participants completed a 152-item FFQ at the beginning of the study and 1 y later, as well as completed 2 weighed 7-d dietary records (7DDRs) and donated 2 blood samples 6 mo apart between FFQ assessments. The reproducibility of the FFQs was evaluated by rank intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The validity was assessed by comparing FFQ-derived DQSs with those from the average of two 7DDRs using Spearman rank correlation coefficients deattenuated for random measurement error in the 7DDRs (rs). Furthermore, we calculated the correlations between DQSs and plasma biomarkers of diet, including fatty acids, folate, carotenoids, retinol, and α- and γ-tocopherol.

Results

Six FFQ-derived DQSs demonstrated moderate to high reproducibility (energy-adjusted ICCs: 0.61-0.84) and validity (energy-adjusted, deattenuated rs = 0.56-0.80) in both men and women. We consistently observed expected correlations between FFQ-derived DQSs with plasma fatty acids, including long-chain n-3 (ω-3) and trans fatty acids, most carotenoids, and γ-tocopherol (rs > 0.2).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the validity of the FFQ to evaluate overall diet quality using 6 commonly used DQSs. In addition, these DQSs have qualitatively demonstrated biological relevance, as indicated by their correlations with circulating biomarkers.

SUBMITTER: Yue Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8895225 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reproducibility and validity of diet quality scores derived from food-frequency questionnaires.

Yue Yiyang Y Yuan Changzheng C Wang Dong D DD Wang Molin M Song Mingyang M Shan Zhilei Z Hu Frank F Rosner Bernard B Smith-Warner Stephanie A SA Willett Walter C WC

The American journal of clinical nutrition 20220301 3

<h4>Background</h4>Diet quality scores (DQSs) are frequently used to study diet-disease relations but the validity of these scores derived from FFQs has rarely been evaluated.<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of 6 commonly used DQSs derived from the FFQ, including the Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial score, alternative Mediterranean diet score, and 3 plant-based diet indices (overall, healthful, and unhealthful).<h4> ...[more]

PMID: 34788377

Similar Datasets

Project description:Short versions of qualitative and quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are widely used to assess usual food intake. However, fewer studies evaluated their relative validity and reproducibility in the Chinese population. This study compared 12-day 24-h dietary recalls with qualitative and quantitative FFQs designed by the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) study to assess the relative validity. Two FFQs were administered in the second and third seasons and compared to evaluate the reproducibility. Statistical tests included Spearman correlation coefficients, weighted kappa, and cross-classification. A total of 432 participants were eligible after stratifying by age, sex, and four regions. In the validation of qualitative FFQ, adjusted Spearman coefficients were between 0.23 and 0.59, and weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.88, except for fresh vegetables. The percentage of correct classification was highest in fresh vegetables and lowest in fresh fruit, but the percentages of extreme classification were below 3.0%. Corresponding Spearman and kappa coefficients for the reproducibility were 0.17-0.56 and 0.62-0.90. Furthermore, the correct classification constituted between 35.6 and 93.3% of all participants. Regarding the relative validity of the quantitative FFQ, Spearman coefficients ranged from 0.14 to 0.69 in addition to dried vegetables and carbonated soft drinks. For items with more than two-thirds of total participants consumed, weighted kappa coefficients were from 0.57 to 0.79; correct classification percentages were between 34.6% and 67.5%. Spearman and kappa coefficients for the reproducibility of the quantitative FFQ were 0.15-0.71 and 0.60-0.86, respectively; correct classification percentages varied from 47.8% to 71.6%. Most food items from the qualitative FFQ showed acceptable or even good relative validity and reproducibility in the CKB study. Likewise, major food items in the quantitative FFQ were valid and reproducible, but poor performances of dried vegetables and carbonated soft drinks indicated the need for modification and validation in future research.

Project description:BackgroundDietary questionnaires currently available which can assess the habitual diet are timely, costly, or not adapted well to the modern diet; thus, there is a need for a shorter food frequency e-Questionnaire (FFeQ) adapted to Western diets, in order to properly estimate energy and macronutrient intakes or rank individuals according to food and nutrient intakes.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the relative validity and reproducibility of a 30-minute and 44-item FFeQ in a sample of adults obtained from the general population.MethodsA sample of French adults was recruited through social media and an advertising campaign. A total of 223 volunteers completed the FFeQ twice at one-year intervals and were included in the reproducibility study. During that interval, 92 participants completed three-to-six 24-hour recalls and were included in the validity study. Nutrient and dietary intakes were computed for all validity and reproducibility participants. The level of agreement between the two methods was evaluated for nutrient and food group intakes using classification into quintiles of daily intake, correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsFor relative validity, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.09 to 0.88 (unadjusted correlation coefficients, median: 0.48) and 0.02 to 0.68 (deattenuated and energy adjusted correlation coefficients, median: 0.50) for food group and nutrient intakes, respectively. The median proportion of subjects classified into the same or adjacent quintile was 73% and 66% for food and nutrient intakes, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement across the range of intakes. Regarding reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.33 to 0.72 (median: 0.60) and 0.55 to 0.73 (median: 0.64), for food and nutrient intakes, respectively.ConclusionsThe FFeQ showed acceptable validity and reproducibility in a sample of adults based on their food and nutrient intakes. The FFeQ is a promising and low-cost tool that can be used in large-scale online epidemiological studies or clinical routines and could be integrated into evidence-based smartphone apps for assessing diet components.

Project description:BackgroundThe food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is the most efficient and cost-effective method to investigate the relationship between usual diet and disease in epidemiologic studies. Although FFQs have been validated in many adult populations worldwide, the number of valid FFQ in preschool children is very scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative FFQ designed for children aged 4 to 5 years.Materials and methodsIn this study, we have included 169 children aged 4-5 years from the INMA project in Valencia, a population-based prospective cohort study of mothers and children in Spain. The 105-items FFQ was administered twice to the parents or care-givers of children over a 9-month period. Reproducibility was explored by comparing intake of nutrients by the FFQs, while validity was examined by comparing the nutrient values from the FFQs with the average nutrient values of three 24 hour dietary recall (24hDR) taken in the period, and also, with the concentration in blood specimens for several vitamins (carotenoids, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin C and α-tocopherol). Pearson correlation coefficients and de-attenuated correlation coefficients were calculated and we also evaluated misclassification by quintile distribution.ResultsAll correlation coefficients for reproducibility for nutrients and major food groups were statistically significant; the average correlation coefficients for daily intake were 0.43 for food groups and 0.41 for nutrients. The average correlation coefficients for validity for daily intakes against 24hDR was r = 0.30, and the average for de-attenuated correlation coefficients was r = 0.44. When evaluating validity against the blood concentration of vitamins, statistically significant correlations were observed for vitamin C (0.35), lycopene (0.31), β-Cryptoxantin (0.40), and vitamin E (0.29); the average of correlation coefficients was r = 0.21.ConclusionDespite some low to moderate correlations for reproducibility and validity, overall this study suggests that the FFQ may be a good method for assessing a wide range of food groups and nutrients intake in children aged 4-5 years.

Dataset Information

Reproducibility and validity of diet quality scores derived from food-frequency questionnaires.

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Reproducibility and validity of diet quality scores derived from food-frequency questionnaires.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets