Dataset Information

Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Health technology assessment (HTA) has become essential in many countries over the past few years, and the demand for HTA professionals has increased in academia, governments, and industries. This study aimed to examine which courses are most important and which training activities are most helpful for the development of HTA proficiency as perceived by HTA experts.

Methods

The survey questionnaire was developed by literature review and expert opinion. Convenience sampling was used to survey HTA experts from the industrial sector, academic/research units, and government/independent assessment organizations using an online survey tool, SurveyCake. We collected respondents' demographic information and asked them to assess the importance of each course included in an HTA program on a 5-point Likert Scale (1 = least important; 5 = highly important). In addition, respondents were asked to assess the extent to which various activities are helpful for HTA proficiency development.

Results

A total of 158 domestic and overseas experts in HTA-related fields were invited to participate in the survey and 68 completed the questionnaire. Among the respondents, the majority were female (57.4%) and working in academia (44.1%). The mean ± standard deviation of respondents' age and number of years spent in HTA-related fields were 43.2 ± 11.0 years and 11.3 ± 9.9 years, respectively. The course that was rated the most important was "Pharmacoeconomics/Cost-effectiveness analysis" with a score of 4.8 ± 0.4 points, followed by "Health economics" at 4.7 ± 0.7 points. Moreover, internships at HTA-related institutions were perceived to be the most helpful training activity for HTA proficiency development.

Conclusions

Our study findings provide a better understanding of the requirements for developing HTA proficiency and can serve as a reference for the modification of current HTA education and training programs.

SUBMITTER: Wu YS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8903637 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey.

Wu Yu-Shan YS Chen Chiehfeng C Wang Lin-Chien LC Jian Li-Shan LS Ko Yu Y

BMC medical education 20220308 1

<h4>Background</h4>Health technology assessment (HTA) has become essential in many countries over the past few years, and the demand for HTA professionals has increased in academia, governments, and industries. This study aimed to examine which courses are most important and which training activities are most helpful for the development of HTA proficiency as perceived by HTA experts.<h4>Methods</h4>The survey questionnaire was developed by literature review and expert opinion. Convenience sampli ...[more]

PMID: 35260163

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo investigate the attitude and formal suggestions on talent cultivation in the field of medical artificial intelligence (AI).MethodsAn electronic questionnaire was sent to both medical-related field or non-medical field population using the WenJuanXing web-application via social media. The questionnaire was designed to collect: (I) demographic information; (II) perception of medical AI; (III) willingness to participate in the medical AI related teaching activities; (IV) teaching content of medical AI; (V) the role of medical AI teaching; (VI) future career planning. Respondents' anonymity was ensured.ResultsA total of 710 respondents provided valid answers to the questionnaire (57.75% medical related, 42.25% non-medical). About 73.8% of respondents acquired related information from network and social platform. More than half the respondents had basic perception of AI applicational scenarios and specialties in medicine, meanwhile were willing to participate in related general science activities (conference and lectures). Respondents from medical healthcare related fields, with high academic qualifications of male ones demonstrated showed significant better understanding and stronger willingness (P<0.05). The majority agreed medical AI courses should be set as major elective (42.82%) during undergraduate stages (89.58%) involving medical and computer science contents. An overwhelming majority of respondents (>80%) acknowledged the potential roles of medical AI teaching. Surgeon, ophthalmologist, physicians and researchers are the top tier considerations for ideal career regardless of AI influence. Radiology and clinical laboratory subjects are more preferred considering the development of medical AI (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe potential role of medical AI talent cultivation is widely acknowledged by public. Medical related professions demonstrated higher level of perception and stronger willingness for medical AI educational events. Merging subjects as radiology and clinical laboratory subjects are preferred with broad talents demands and bright prospects.

Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to review and compare current health technology assessment (HTA) activities for medical devices across non-European Union HTA agencies.MethodsHTA activities for medical devices were evaluated from three perspectives: organizational structure, processes, and methods. Agencies were primarily selected upon membership of existing HTA networks. The data collection was performed in two stages: stage 1-agency Web-site assessment using a standardized questionnaire, followed by review and validation of the collected data by a representative of the agency; and stage 2-semi-structured telephone interviews with key informants of a sub-sample of agencies.ResultsIn total, thirty-six HTA agencies across twenty non-EU countries assessing medical devices were included. Twenty-seven of thirty-six (75 percent) agencies were judged at stage 1 to have adopted HTA-specific approaches for medical devices (MD-specific agencies) that were largely organizational or procedural. There appeared to be few differences in the organization, process and methods between MD-specific and non-MD-specific agencies. Although the majority (69 percent) of both categories of agency had specific methods guidance or policy for evidence submission, only one MD-specific agency had developed methodological guidelines specific to medical devices. In stage 2, many MD-specific agencies cited insufficient resources (budget, skilled employees), lack of coordination (between regulator and reimbursement bodies), and the inability to generalize findings from evidence synthesis to be key challenges in the HTA of medical devices.ConclusionsThe lack of evidence for differentiation in scientific methods for HTA of devices raises the question of whether HTA needs to develop new methods for medical devices but rather adapt existing methodological approaches. In contrast, organizational and/or procedural adaptation of existing HTA agency frameworks to accommodate medical devices appear relatively commonplace.

Project description:BackgroundFollowing approximately 10 years from the beginning of Iran's national Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, the present study aims to evaluate its success by examining the impact of HTA and identifying the determinant factors leading to the implementation of HTA report results.MethodsThe triangulation method was employed herein. HTA reports were initially identified and their impact and determinant factors were then examined from the perspectives of both researchers (by preparing a questionnaire according to the Payback model and sending it to HTA principle investigators) and stakeholders (semi-structured interviews held with each HTA stakeholder). Simultaneously, the quality of the HTA reports was examined with relevant critical appraisal checklists.ResultsThe impact of 19 equipment technologies and four pharmaceutical technologies were assessed in this study. Twenty researchers replied (response rate, 86.96%) to the questionnaire on the impact of HTA reports from the researcher's perspective. To assess the impact of HTA reports from the stakeholder's perspective, seven policy-makers were chosen and interviewed as the main target audience. The most common step taken to disseminate the results of the HTA projects was publication. Conducting the HTA had taught researchers and their colleagues' new skills and had facilitated the securing of research grants from other organisations. Most reports had used the systematic review method but the relevant details had been scarcely presented regarding outcomes, costs and analysis. The greatest impact of HTA reports on decision-making had been on policy-makers providing and allocating finances. Barriers in stewardship, identification and prioritisation of topics, performance and dissemination of HTA results were the main barriers of implementing HTAs.ConclusionsIn most aspects, the status of HTA impact reports need improvement. Thus far, the barriers and facilitators of the HTA programme in Iran have been investigated in other studies. These findings should be pooled to reach a solution that can be actively applied to the health system to improve the status quo of HTA in Iran.

Dataset Information

Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets