Comparative T and B immune responses of four different anti-COVID-19 vaccine strategies 6 months after vaccination.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bonnet B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8905884 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Comparative T and B immune responses of four different anti-COVID-19 vaccine strategies 6 months after vaccination.
Bonnet Benjamin B Chabrolles Hélène H Archimbaud Christine C Brebion Amélie A Godignon Maud M Dutheil Frédéric F Lambert Céline C Cosme Justine J Mirand Audrey A Ollier Amandine A Pereira Bruno B Regagnon Christel C Vidal Magali M Evrard Bertrand B Henquell Cécile C
The Journal of infection 20220309 5
Similar Datasets
Project description:More than many other fields in medicine, cancer vaccine development has been plagued by a wide gap between the massive amounts of highly encouraging preclinical data on one hand, and the disappointing clinical results on the other. It is clear now that traditional approaches from the infectious diseases' vaccine field cannot be borrowed as such to treat cancer. This review highlights some of the strategies developed to improve vaccine formulations for oncology, including research into more powerful or "smarter" adjuvants to elicit anti-tumoral cellular immune responses. As an illustration of the difficulties in translating smart preclinical strategies into real benefit for the cancer patient, the difficult road of vaccine development in lung cancer is given as example. Finally, an outline is provided of the combinatorial strategies that leverage the increasing knowledge on tumor-associated immune suppressive networks. Indeed, combining with drugs that target the dominant immunosuppressive pathway in a given tumor promises to unlock the true power of cancer vaccines and potentially offer long-term protection from disease relapse.
| S-EPMC6349827 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe evaluation of durable immune responses is important in HIV vaccine research and development. The efficiency of such evaluation could be increased by incorporating predictors of the responses in the statistical analysis. In this paper, we investigated whether and how baseline demographic variables and immune responses measured two weeks after vaccination predicted durable immune responses measured six months later.MethodsWe included data from seven preventive HIV vaccine regimens evaluated in three clinical trials: a Phase 1 study of four DNA, NYVAC and/or AIDSVAX vaccine regimens (HVTN096), a Phase 2 study of two DNA and/or MVA vaccine regimens (HVTN205), and a Phase 3 study of a single ALVAC/AIDSVAX regimen (RV144). Regularized random forests and linear regression models were used to identify and evaluate predictors of the positivity and magnitude of durable immune responses.ResultsWe analyzed 201 vaccine recipients with data from 10 to 127 immune response biomarkers, and 3-5 demographic variables. The best prediction of participants' durable response positivity based on two-week responses rendered up to close-to-perfect accuracy; the best prediction of participants' durable response magnitude rendered correlation coefficients between the observed and predicted responses ranging up to 0.91. Though prediction performances differed among biomarkers, durable immune responses were best predicted by the two-week response level of the same biomarker. Adding demographic information and two-week response levels of different biomarkers provided little or no improvement in the predictions.ConclusionsFor some biomarkers and for the vaccines we studied, two-week post-vaccination responses can well predict durable responses six months later. Therefore, if immune response durability is only assessed in a sub-sample of vaccine recipients, statistical analyses of durable responses will have increased efficiency by incorporating two-week response data. Further research is needed to generalize the findings to other vaccine regimens and biomarkers. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01799954, NCT00820846, NCT00223080.
| S-EPMC5319823 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Interventions: A patient is vaccinated with Montanide ISA51-adjuvanted WT1 Trio cancer vaccine consisting of two WT1 CTL peptides (WT1-126 and WT1-235) and one WT1 HTL peptide (WT1-332) (2mg each) seven times at the interval of two to four weeks. The interval can be changed within a range from one to 16 weeks.
Primary outcome(s): Induction of WT1-specific immune responses assessed by WT1-related tests such as WT1-DTH skin reaction, serum levels of WT1 peptide IgG autoantibody, and frequency of WT1-CTL in PB * This is evaluated at the interval ranging from 6 to 12 months.
Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized
| 2638831 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:The aim of our study was to investigate the immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 vaccination according to the age and medical status of vaccinated individuals. A total of 511 individuals were enrolled (median age: 54.0 years, range: 19-105); 509 of these individuals (99.6%) received two doses of BNT162b2 at an interval of 21 days. IgG and IgA responses were evaluated on days 21, 42, 90, and 180 after the first dose with chemiluminescent microparticle and ELISA assays. The cell-mediated immune responses were assessed by an automated interferon-gamma release assay. We demonstrated positive antibody responses after vaccination for the majority of enrolled participants, although waning of IgG and IgA titers was also observed over time. We further observed that the intensity of humoral responses was positively correlated with increased age and prior COVID-19 infection (either before or after the first vaccination). Moreover, we found that only a medical history of autoimmune disease could affect the intensity of IgA and IgG responses (3 weeks after the primary and secondary immunization, respectively), while development of systemic adverse reactions after the second vaccination dose was significantly associated with the height of IgG responses. Finally, we identified a clear correlation between humoral and cellular responses, suggesting that the study of cellular responses is not required as a routine laboratory test after vaccination. Our results provide useful information about the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination with significant implications for public health vaccination strategies.
| S-EPMC8879063 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8314733 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9439865 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Vaccines for protection against respiratory infections should optimally induce a mucosal immune response in the respiratory tract in addition to a systemic immune response. However, current parenteral immunization modalities generally fail to induce mucosal immunity, while mucosal vaccine delivery often results in poor systemic immunity. In order to find an immunization strategy which satisfies the need for induction of both mucosal and systemic immunity, we compared local and systemic immune responses elicited by two mucosal immunizations, given either by the intranasal (IN) or the intrapulmonary (IPL) route, with responses elicited by a mucosal prime followed by a systemic boost immunization. The study was conducted in BALB/c mice and the vaccine formulation was an influenza subunit vaccine supplemented with GPI-0100, a saponin-derived adjuvant. While optimal mucosal antibody titers were obtained after two intrapulmonary vaccinations, optimal systemic antibody responses were achieved by intranasal prime followed by intramuscular boost. The latter strategy also resulted in the best T cell response, yet, it was ineffective in inducing nose or lung IgA. Successful induction of secretory IgA, IgG and T cell responses was only achieved with prime-boost strategies involving intrapulmonary immunization and was optimal when both immunizations were given via the intrapulmonary route. Our results underline that immunization via the lungs is particularly effective for priming as well as boosting of local and systemic immune responses.
| S-EPMC3729563 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus causes serious health care- and community-associated disease, requiring improved preventive measures such as vaccines. The investigational S. aureus 4-antigen vaccine (SA4Ag), comprising capsular polysaccharide serotypes 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8) conjugated to CRM197, recombinant mutant clumping factor A (rmClfA), and recombinant manganese transporter protein C (rP305A or rMntC), was well tolerated, inducing robust functional immune responses to all 4 antigens through 12 months postvaccination. This is a serological extension study through 36 months postvaccination.MethodsIn 2 previous studies, healthy adults received SA4Ag, SA3Ag (without rMntC), or placebo; serology was also assessed at ~24 and ~36 months postvaccination. Functional immune responses (antibody responses that facilitate killing of S. aureus or neutralize S. aureus virulence mechanisms) were assessed with opsonophagocytic activity killing assays (CP5 or CP8) and a fibrinogen-binding inhibition assay (ClfA). A competitive Luminex immunoassay assessed ClfA and rMntC responses. Adverse events within 48 hours of blood draw were recorded.ResultsFour hundred forty subjects (18-64 years old, 255; 65-85 years old, 185) were enrolled. At 24 and 36 months postvaccination, subjects receiving SA4Ag had substantially higher geometric mean titers (GMTs) for CP5, CP8, and ClfA vs baseline; geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) from baseline to month 36 were 2.7-8.1. For rMntC, 36-month GMTs declined from peak levels but remained above baseline for all SA4Ag groups; GMFRs from baseline to month 36 were 1.8 and 1.5 in the younger and older cohorts, respectively.ConclusionsPersistent functional immune responses to S. aureus antigens were observed through 36 months in healthy adults.ClinicaltrialsgovNCT01643941 and NCT01364571.
| S-EPMC6978999 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccines that elicit a protective immune response in the lungs is important for the development of an effective vaccine against tuberculosis.Methods and principal findingsIn this study, a comparison of intranasal (i.n.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) vaccination with the BCG vaccine demonstrated that a single moderate dose delivered intranasally induced a stronger and sustained M. tuberculosis-specific T-cell response in lung parenchyma and cervical lymph nodes of BALB/c mice than vaccine delivered subcutaneously. Both BCG and a multicomponent subunit vaccine composed of nine M. tuberculosis recombinant proteins induced strong antigen-specific T-cell responses in various local and peripheral immune compartments. Among the nine recombinant proteins evaluated, the alanine proline rich antigen (Apa, Rv1860) was highly antigenic following i.n. BCG and immunogenic after vaccination with a combination of the nine recombinant antigens. The Apa-induced responses included induction of both type 1 and type 2 cytokines in the lungs as evaluated by ELISPOT and a multiplexed microsphere-based cytokine immunoassay. Of importance, i.n. subunit vaccination with Apa imparted significant protection in the lungs and spleen of mice against M. tuberculosis challenge. Despite observed differences in the frequencies and location of specific cytokine secreting T cells both BCG vaccination routes afforded comparable levels of protection in our study.Conclusion and significanceOverall, our findings support consideration and further evaluation of an intranasally targeted Apa-based vaccine to prevent tuberculosis.
| S-EPMC3143185 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We have designed a prospective study aiming to monitor the immune response in 178 health care workers six months after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. The humoral immune response of all subjects was evaluated by chemiluminescence (CMIA); in 60 serum samples, a live virus-based neutralization assay was also tested. Moreover, 6 months after vaccination, B- and T-cell subsets from 20 subjects were observed by FACS analysis after restimulation with the trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as an antigen, thus mimicking reinfection in vitro. A significant decrease of circulating IgG levels and neutralizing antibodies over time were observed. Moreover, six months after vaccination, a variable T-cell immune response after in vitro antigen stimulation of PBMC was observed. On the contrary, the analysis of B-cell response showed a shift from unswitched to switched memory B-cells and an increase of Th17 cells. Although the variability of the CD4+ and CD8+ immune response and an antibody decline was observed among vaccinated subjects, the increase of switched memory B-cells and Th17 cells, correlating with the presence of neutralizing antibodies, opened the debate on the correct timing of vaccination.
| S-EPMC8879995 | biostudies-literature