Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Our objective was to safely and remotely assess longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in at-risk health care workers at the onset of the epidemic.Methods
Self-administered serologic testing was performed every 30 days up to 5 times using a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG immunoassay in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n = 339) and lower-risk controls (n = 100).Results
Subjects were enrolled between 4/14/20-5/6/20 and most were clinicians (41%) or nurses (27%). Of 20 subjects who reported confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to (n = 5, 1%) or during the study (n = 15, 3%), half (10/20) were seropositive. Five additional subjects were seropositive and did not report documented infection. Estimated infection rates in health care workers did not differ from concurrent community rates.Conclusions
This remotely conducted, contact-free study did not identify serologic evidence of widespread occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers.
SUBMITTER: Card L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8906004 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Card Lauren L Litwin Christine M CM Curry Scott S Mack Elizabeth H EH Nietert Paul J PJ Meissner Eric G EG
The American journal of the medical sciences 20220309 3
<h4>Background</h4>Our objective was to safely and remotely assess longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in at-risk health care workers at the onset of the epidemic.<h4>Methods</h4>Self-administered serologic testing was performed every 30 days up to 5 times using a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG immunoassay in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n = 339) and lower-risk controls (n = 100).<h4>Results</h4>Subjects were enrolled between 4/14/20-5/6/20 and most were c ...[more]