Dataset Information

Laparoscopic redo anastomosis for management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is still no consensus on the management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Among of various treatment strategies, laparoscopic redo anastomosis for intraperitoneal leakage has rarely been reported in the literature and is condemned by some. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic redo anastomosis for intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of laparoscopic redo anastomosis for intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery from January 2013 to May 2020. An accompanying video demonstrates the technique.

Results

Fifteen consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic redo anastomosis for management of leakage after colonic surgery; two patients required conversion to open repair. A protective stoma was created in three patients during the second operation. There was no re-leakage nor mortality in this series.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic redo anastomosis was feasible and safe for the management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Considering the advantages of re-do laparoscopy, this procedure should be part of every surgeon's armamentarium to deal with anastomotic leakage and represents a logical alternative to the "Diversion and Drainage" technique.

SUBMITTER: Chen YC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8957142 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Laparoscopic redo anastomosis for management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery.

Chen Yi-Chang YC Ke Tao-Wei TW Tsai Yuan-Yao YY Fingerhut Abe A Chen William Tzu-Liang WT

BMC surgery 20220325 1

<h4>Background</h4>There is still no consensus on the management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Among of various treatment strategies, laparoscopic redo anastomosis for intraperitoneal leakage has rarely been reported in the literature and is condemned by some. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic redo anastomosis for intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage.<h4>Methods</h4>Retrospective chart review of laparoscopic redo ana ...[more]

PMID: 35337322

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPreventive ileostomy (PI) is conventionally performed to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) for low rectal cancer; however, secondary surgery is required to remove the ostomy tube. We designed a new type of ostomy, transcecum catheterization ileostomy (TCI) to prevent AL. Its principle is similar to PI, but no secondary operation is needed. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of TCI in AL prevention.MethodsWe analyzed the data of patients who underwent LTME with low anastomosis in Chongqing University Cancer Hospital from October 2015 to August 2021. Patients were divided into three groups according to their choice: those who underwent TCI (TCI group), those who underwent PI (PI group), and those who undergo none (C group). Intra-operation situation, postoperative efficacy and safety indicators were compared between three groups.ResultsOut of the total 534 patients included, 171 underwent TCI, 156 underwent PI, and 207 underwent none. No statistically difference was noted in baseline characteristics between three groups (all P>0.05). Operation time was longer in TCI group and PI group than in C group (P<0.001). No difference was noted in intraoperative blood loss or the number of lymph nodes dissected (P=0.685 and P=0.153). Moreover, no difference was noted in the serum levels of immune cells on postoperative day 1, 3, and 7 (all P>0.05) or in the levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6; all P>0.05). No difference was noted in postoperative incision, pulmonary infection rates and intestinal obstruction incidence (P=0.530, P=0.971, and P=0.938). AL incidence and AL-related reoperation rates were lower in TCI or PI group (P=0.002 and P<0.001). The rate of anastomotic stricture was lower in TCI group than in the other two groups (P<0.001).ConclusionsTCI is effective to prevent AL when performed during LTME. But TCI cannot completely avoid AL. When AL occurs, TCI can reduce the degree of abdominal infection and the secondary surgical rate related AL. TCI presents an alternative option to PI, that does not require secondary operation. Therefore, TCI is safe and worthy of application.

Dataset Information

Laparoscopic redo anastomosis for management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Laparoscopic redo anastomosis for management of intraperitoneal anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets