Dataset Information

ABO blood groups and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

ABSTRACT: There is no doubt that genetic factors of the host play a role in susceptibility to infectious diseases. An association between ABO blood groups and SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as the severity of COVID-19 has been suggested relatively early during the pandemic and gained enormously high public interest. It was postulated that blood group A predisposes to a higher risk of infection as well as to a much higher risk of severe respiratory disease and that people with blood group O are less frequently and less severely affected by the disease. However, as to the severity of COVID-19, a thorough summary of the existing literature does not support these assumptions in general. Accordingly, at this time, there is no reason to suppose that knowledge of a patient's ABO phenotype should directly influence therapeutical decisions in any way. On the other hand, there are many data available supporting an association between the ABO blood groups and the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2. To explain this association, several interactions between the virus and the host cell membrane have been proposed which will be discussed here.

SUBMITTER: Bullerdiek J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8973646 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ABO blood groups and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Bullerdiek Jörn J Reisinger Emil E Rommel Birgit B Dotzauer Andreas A

Protoplasma 20220401 6

There is no doubt that genetic factors of the host play a role in susceptibility to infectious diseases. An association between ABO blood groups and SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as the severity of COVID-19 has been suggested relatively early during the pandemic and gained enormously high public interest. It was postulated that blood group A predisposes to a higher risk of infection as well as to a much higher risk of severe respiratory disease and that people with blood group O are less frequent ...[more]

PMID: 35364749

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceNewborn immunity largely relies on maternal-fetal transfer of antibodies in utero. Incongruency in ABO blood groups between a mother and newborn may be associated with protection against serious infections, but data specific to newborn bacterial infections are lacking.ObjectiveTo ascertain the association between maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence and lower risk of bacterial infection in newborns.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study used linked patient-level datasets for all singleton live births between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, in hospitals and health centers in Ontario, Canada. The cohort comprised maternal-newborn pairs with known ABO blood groups. Data analysis was conducted between February and May 2024.ExposureMaternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence vs congruence.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was a bacterial infection arising in newborns within 30 days of birth. Bacterial infection was cultured from either blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, or lung specimen. Secondary outcomes were a bacterial infection with 7 days and 90 days of birth. Modified Poisson regression generated adjusted relative risks (ARRs) and 95% CIs, adjusted for neonatal sex and preterm birth.ResultsA total of 138 207 maternal-newborn pairs (maternal mean [SD] age, 31.8 [5.1] years among those with ABO blood group incongruency and 31.5 [5.1] years among those with ABO blood group congruency; newborn mean [SD] gestational age, 38.5 [2.3] weeks among those with incongruency and 38.4 [2.5] weeks among those with congruency; 19 475 males [51.3%] with incongruency and 52 041 males [51.9%] with congruency) were analyzed. Of these pairs, 37 953 (27.5%) had ABO blood group incongruency and 100 254 (72.5%) had ABO blood group congruency. Within 30 days of birth, 328 (8.6 per 1000) newborns in the incongruent group and 1029 (10.3 per 1000) newborns in the congruent group experienced a bacterial infection, corresponding to an ARR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.03). The ARRs for bacterial infection within 7 days and 90 days of birth were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.73-1.09) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.94), respectively.Conclusions and relevanceThis cohort study found no association between maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence and risk of bacterial infection in newborns within 30 and 7 days of birth. However, incongruence was associated with a decreased risk of bacterial infection within 90 days of birth.

Project description:BackgroundThe ABO and rhesus (Rh) blood groups may influence risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.ObjectiveTo determine whether ABO and Rh blood groups are associated with risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illness.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingOntario, Canada.PatientsAll adults and children who had ABO blood group assessed between January 2007 and December 2019 and who subsequently had SARS-CoV-2 testing between 15 January and 30 June 2020.MeasurementsThe main study outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection, determined by viral RNA polymerase chain reaction testing. A second outcome was severe COVID-19 illness or death. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and absolute risk differences (ARDs) were adjusted for demographic characteristics and comorbidities.ResultsA total of 225 556 persons were included, with a mean age of 54 years. The aRR of SARS-CoV-2 infection for O blood group versus A, AB, and B blood groups together was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.92; ARD, -3.9 per 1000 [CI, -5.4 to -2.5]). Rhesus-negative (Rh-) blood type was protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection (aRR, 0.79 [CI, 0.73 to 0.85]; ARD, -6.8 per 1000 [CI, -8.9 to -4.7]), especially for those who were O-negative (O-) (aRR, 0.74 [CI, 0.66 to 0.83]; ARD, -8.2 per 1000 [CI, -10.8 to -5.3]). There was also a lower risk for severe COVID-19 illness or death associated with type O blood group versus all others (aRR, 0.87 [CI, 0.78 to 0.97]; ARD, -0.8 per 1000 [CI, -1.4 to -0.2]) and with Rh- versus Rh-positive (aRR, 0.82 [CI, 0.68 to 0.96]; ARD, -1.1 per 1000 [CI, -2.0 to -0.2]).LimitationPersons who rapidly died of severe COVID-19 illness may not have had SARS-CoV-2 testing.ConclusionThe O and Rh- blood groups may be associated with a slightly lower risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 illness.Primary funding sourceOntario Academic Health Sciences Centre AFP Innovation Fund and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Dataset Information

ABO blood groups and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Publications

ABO blood groups and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets