Project description:A small aortic root and annulus would need extensive aortic annular enlargement during valve replacement in adult patients to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch. This report describes a technique that enlarges the aortic annulus by 4-5 valve sizes as well as a modification of the aortotomy with the roof technique to make the aortotomy closure easier and more hemostatic while enlarging the sinotubular junction and proximal ascending aorta effectively for future transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01606-4.
Project description:BackgroundAortic root enlargement (ARE) during aortic valve replacement (AVR) mitigates prosthesis-patient mismatch, but its use has been low. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) as a treatment for failing bioprosthetic valves is limited by small surgical valves, renewing interest in ARE during the index AVR. This study demonstrates trends and outcomes of ARE after commercial approval of VIV in 2015.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 2182 patients undergoing nonemergent AVR between August 2007 and December 2022. Endocarditis, aortic dissection, and concomitant root replacement or ventricular assist device placement were excluded. Trends in ARE use, valve size, and types were compared. Outcome measures included 30-day mortality and gradients and were compared between patients with and without ARE.ResultsOverall, 74 patients (3.4%) underwent ARE, 14 (1.0%) before 2015 and 60 (7.6%, P < .0001) after 2015. Use of smaller valves (19-21 mm) decreased from 372 (26.8%) before 2015 to 85 (10.7%, P < .0001) after 2015. ARE group was younger than the AVR-alone group (64 vs 68 years, P = .001) but had similar predicted risk of mortality (median, 1.7%). Both groups had comparable postoperative mean gradients (ARE: 11 vs AVR-alone: 10 mm Hg, P = .42). ARE had higher 30-day mortality (5 [7%] vs 48 [2%], P = .014); however, no difference was found in elective patients (2 of 65 [3%] vs 39 of 1898 [2%], P = .57).ConclusionsARE use has increased since commercial approval of VIV. The addition of ARE to AVR did not affect early safety in elective cases, and postoperative gradients were similar to those in patients not requiring ARE. Further studies are required to determine long-term outcomes after ARE, including VIV candidacy.
Project description:For a fifth-time redo aortic valve replacement, a Y incision was made through the left-noncommissure post into the aortomitral curtain above the mitral annulus, undermining the aortic annulus below the nadirs of left coronary and noncoronary cusps without violating the left atrium or mitral valve. A rectangular Hemashield (Maquet Cardiovascular, San Jose, CA) patch was used to extensively enlarge the aortomitral curtain. The aortic annulus was increased from 21 mm to 27 mm for a mechanical aortic valve replacement. The patient was discharged without blood transfusion or any complications. Our enlargement technique was simple and effective to enlarge the aortic annulus for mechanical aortic valve replacement.
Project description:Valve-sparing aortic root replacement is an attractive option for younger patients with acute type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to design a new patch technique for reconstructing the aortic root and preserving the aortic valve following aortic dissection. Between July 2017 and December 2018, 35 patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root repair using this new patch technique. All participants were in the supine position, transesophageal echocardiography and median sternotomy were routinely performed. After thrombi at the aortic root were removed in acute type A dissection, the luminal aortic intimal dissection was removed until the aortic condition was normalized. In each aortic sinus involved in the dissection, a Dacron-graft patch with the shape corresponding to the defect was sutured to the normal remnant vascular wall or aortic annulus in the aortic sinus using 5-0 Prolene suture to reconstruct the aortic root. A total of 2 patients died, and 1 cerebral infarction, and 3 cases of transient brain dysfunction were recorded. The sinus tube junction and sinus diameter were within the normal ranges when they were reexamined 3 months after surgery. This new patch technique circumvents the redesign of the spatial 3D structure of the aortic valve, is simple to operate, and easy to master. It completely removes the diseased dissection tissue, avoids the use of glue, and is an alternative surgical technique, especially for beginners.
Project description:Y-incision aortic annular enlargement has been used for 4 years with favorable early outcomes. Occasionally, we have seen a tensed anastomotic suture line of the rectangular patch to the aortomitral curtain/mitral annulus. We developed an Arc modification of the rectangular patch that completely resolved this issue. The Arc modification has been our new routine since May 2024 for Y-incision aortic annular enlargement in all first-time aortic valve replacements or in some reoperative aortic valve replacements if the aortomitral curtain was preserved. The outcomes were favorable, and there were no issues of hemostasis of the suture line.
Project description:BackgroundAortic regurgitation remains a challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), because of the high risk of post-procedural migration or paravalvular leakage resulting from the anatomical and pathophysiological features.Case summaryA 75-year-old male with symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation underwent transfemoral TAVR due to poor physical condition and a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 11.3%. However, complete dislodgement of the valve into the ascending aorta occurred during the operation. We performed a modified valve-in-valve technique by using an ablation catheter (instead of performing urgent surgery), and no post-interventional complications were found during hospitalization. The patient was discharged in a stable condition on postoperative Day 12. At the 6-month follow-up, echocardiography showed trivial paravalvular leakage. The left ventricular ejection fraction further improved from 30 to 48%.DiscussionThe management of valve migration can be troublesome. In this case, we performed a modified valve-in-valve technique by using an ablation catheter without post-interventional complications. This is a novel strategy for the management of emergencies, which could avoid surgical thoracotomy. Our strategy may be an alternative option in some cases of valve jumping up to the ascending aorta.