Dataset Information

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis was associated with no impact on sexually transmitted infection prevalence in a high-prevalence population of predominantly men who have sex with men, Germany, 2018 to 2019.

ABSTRACT: IntroductionDespite increased use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Germany, HIV infection rates are not declining and little is known about how this prevention method affects the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) among men who have sex with men (MSM).AimWe studied, in a large multicentre cohort, STI point prevalence, co-infection rates, anatomical location and influence of PrEP.MethodsThe BRAHMS study was a prospective cohort study conducted at 10 sites in seven major German cities that enrolled MSM reporting increased sexual risk behaviour. At screening visits, MSM were tested for Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Treponema pallidum (TP), and given a behavioural questionnaire. With binomial regression, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of PrEP and STI.ResultsWe screened 1,043 MSM in 2018 and 2019, with 53.0% currently using PrEP. At screening, 370 participants (35.5%) had an STI. The most common pathogen was MG in 198 (19.0%) participants, followed by CT (n = 133; 12.8%), NG (n = 105; 10.1%) and TP (n = 37; 3.5%). Among the 370 participants with at least one STI, 14.6% (n = 54) reported STI-related symptoms. Infection prevalence was highest at anorectal site (13.4% MG, 6.5% NG, 10.2% CT). PrEP use was not statistically significant in adjusted models for STI (PR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.91-1.32), NG/CT, only NG or only CT.ConclusionsPrevalence of asymptomatic STI was high, and PrEP use did not influence STI prevalence in MSM eligible for PrEP according to national guidelines.

SUBMITTER: Streeck H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8991735 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis was associated with no impact on sexually transmitted infection prevalence in a high-prevalence population of predominantly men who have sex with men, Germany, 2018 to 2019.

Streeck Hendrik H Jansen Klaus K Crowell Trevor A TA Esber Allahna A Jessen Heiko K HK Cordes Christiane C Scholten Stefan S Schneeweiss Stephan S Brockmeyer Norbert N Spinner Christoph D CD Bickel Markus M Esser Stefan S Hartikainen Jukka J Stoehr Albrecht A Lehmann Clara C Marcus Ulrich U Vehreschild Jörg Janne JJ Knorr Alexandra A Brillen Anna-Lena AL Tiemann Carsten C Robb Merlin L ML Michael Nelson L NL

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin 20220401 14

IntroductionDespite increased use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Germany, HIV infection rates are not declining and little is known about how this prevention method affects the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) among men who have sex with men (MSM).AimWe studied, in a large multicentre cohort, STI point prevalence, co-infection rates, anatomical location and influence of PrEP.MethodsThe BRAHMS study was a prospective cohort study conducted at 10 sites in seven major Germ ...[more]

PMID: 35393933

Similar Datasets

Project description:The impact of starting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections (STI) remains unclear. We used data from German HIV/STI Checkpoints collected from 01/2019 to 08/2021 to determine the impact of PrEP use on syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia diagnoses. We used self-reported data on demographics, sexual behaviour, testing and PrEP use, as well as lab-confirmed diagnoses from visits to HIV/STI Checkpoints in Germany. PrEP use was categorized as (1) never used; (2) intention to use; (3) former use; (4) current on-demand use; (5) daily use. In multivariate regression analyses (MRA) with gonorrhoea, chlamydia, and syphilis diagnoses as outcomes, we controlled for age, number of sexual partners, number of condomless anal intercourse (CAI) partners in the last six months, and testing recency. For the analysis, we included 9,219 visits for gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing and 11,199 visits for syphilis testing conducted at checkpoints from 01/2019 to 08/2021. MRA identified age (aOR 0.98; 95%CI 0.97-0.99), number of sexual partners in the past six months (aOR 4.90; 95%CI 2.53-9.52 for 11 + partners), and use of chemsex substances (aOR 1.62; 95%CI 1.32-2.00) as risk factors for gonorrhoea, while age (aOR 0.99; 95%CI 0.98-1.00), number of CAI partners (aOR 3.19; 95%CI 2.32-4.41 for 5 + partners), partner sorting (aOR 1.30; 95%CI 1.09-1.54), and use of chemsex substances (aOR 1.29; 95%CI 1.05-1.59) were risk factors for chlamydia infections. For syphilis, the number of CAI partners (aOR 3.19; 95%CI 1.60-6.34 for 5 + partners) was found to be the only significant risk factor. There was a strong association between PrEP use and the number of sexual partners (≤ 5 vs.>5: aOR 3.58; 95%CI 2.15-5.97 for daily PrEP use), the number of CAI partners in the past six months (≤ 1 vs.>1: aOR 3.70; 95%CI 2.15-6.37 for daily PrEP use), and the number of STI tests performed (suggesting higher testing frequency). Both outcomes were also related to partner sorting, chemsex, and selling sex. Checkpoint visits reporting current PrEP use or intention to start PrEP correlated with eligibility criteria for PrEP, i.e. high partner numbers, inconsistent condom use during anal intercourse, and use of chemsex drugs. Use of HIV-specific prevention methods such as HIV serosorting, PrEP sorting, and viral load sorting was reported more frequently. (Daily) PrEP use was an independent risk factor for a chlamydia diagnosis only.

Project description:BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against HIV infection is a new approach that involves the prophylactic use of the anti-HIV drug Truvada (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF] and emtricitabine [FTC]) by people not infected with HIV.ObjectiveThe objective of this investigator-initiated clinical study of PrEP was to evaluate the incidence of HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI), safety and efficacy of PrEP in PrEP users, and their compliance with PrEP medication. The social, medical, and economic benefits of PrEP in Japan was assessed.MethodsThis single-center feasibility study of PrEP was conducted at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, where a cohort of men who have sex with men without HIV was established in January 2017. This single-arm interventional study compared the efficacy and safety of PrEP in a single group of men who have sex with men who participated in PrEP cohort studies. For reference, the cohort study participants who did not participate in the PrEP study were included for comparison. Blood samples were collected for storage at baseline and clinic visits at 1, 3, and 6 months after starting PrEP and every 3 months thereafter. The participants were administered with 1 tablet of Truvada once daily as PrEP. They underwent blood and anal swab tests 1 and 3 months after starting PrEP and then HIV and STI infection assessments at 3-month intervals. Blood samples were centrifuged at the AIDS Clinical Center Laboratory. PrEP safety was evaluated by monitoring serum creatinine levels for symptoms of renal function disorders. The primary end point was the incidence of HIV in PrEP users (100 person-years). The secondary end points were the incidence of STI in PrEP users (100 person-years), incidence of adverse events caused by Truvada, frequency of high-risk sexual activity, and adherence to periodic visits and medication.ResultsThe study protocol was reviewed and approved by the certified review board of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM-C-003129-03) on April 20, 2020. Changes to the study plan were submitted for review by the certified review board and approved before implementation. Recruitment was completed on March 28, 2019, and the study was completed (last adult participant and last time point) on March 31, 2021. The data were analyzed, and the main results of the study have been published in a peer-reviewed journal.ConclusionsThe findings indicated that PrEP is a highly effective and feasible strategy against HIV infection in terms of prophylactic response, retention, and compliance.Trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000031040; https://tinyurl.com/3msdkeb8 and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031180134; https://tinyurl.com/2p88mhyr.International registered report identifier (irrid)RR1-10.2196/50919.

Project description:IntroductionGiven the synergistic relationship between HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI), the integration of services has the potential to reduce the incidence of both HIV and STIs. We explored the extent to which STI testing has been offered within HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programmes worldwide.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of PrEP programmes implementing STI testing services in nine databases. We approached PrEP implementers for additional unpublished data and implementation details. Descriptive statistics were used to present the characteristics of STI testing within PrEP programmes. Content analysis of the input from PrEP implementers was conducted to summarize the barriers to and facilitators of STI testing.ResultsOf 9,161 citations, 91 studies conducted in 32 countries were included: 69% from high-income countries (HICs) and 64% from programmes targeting men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) only. The majority of programmes (70%, 64/91) conducted STI testing before the initiation of PrEP. The most common STIs tested were gonorrhoea (86%, 78/91), chlamydia (84%, 76/91) and syphilis (84%, 76/91). The majority provided STI testing at three-month intervals (70%, 53/76, for syphilis; 70% 53/78, for chlamydia; 68%, 53/78, for gonorrhoea). Relative to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), a higher proportion of PrEP programmes in HICs offered testing for gonorrhoea (92% vs. 71%, p < 0.05), chlamydia (92% vs. 64%, p < 0.01), syphilis (87% vs. 75%, p < 0.05), hepatitis A (18% vs. 4%, p < 0.05) and hepatitis C (43% vs. 21%, p < 0.05); offered testing for a higher number of STIs (mean 3.75 vs. 3.04, p < 0.05); and offered triple (throat, genital/urine and anorectal) anatomical site screening (54% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Common implementation challenges included costs, access to STI diagnostics, programme logistics of integrating STI testing into PrEP delivery models and lack of capacity building for staff involved in PrEP provision.ConclusionsSignificant gaps and challenges remain in the provision of STI testing services within HIV PrEP programmes. We recommend more active integration of STI testing and management into PrEP programmes, supported by standardized practice guidelines, staff capacity building training and adequate funding. This could lead to improved sexual health and HIV outcomes in key populations.

Dataset Information

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis was associated with no impact on sexually transmitted infection prevalence in a high-prevalence population of predominantly men who have sex with men, Germany, 2018 to 2019.

Publications

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis was associated with no impact on sexually transmitted infection prevalence in a high-prevalence population of predominantly men who have sex with men, Germany, 2018 to 2019.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets