Dataset Information

Gait asymmetry is associated with performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Adults with lower-limb amputation walk with an asymmetrical gait and exhibit poor functional outcomes, which may negatively impact quality-of-life.

Objective

To evaluate associations between gait asymmetry and performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.

Methods

A cross-sectional study involving 38 adults with a unilateral transtibial (N = 24; 62.5 ± 10.5 years) or transfemoral amputation (N = 14; 59.9 ± 9.5 years) was conducted. Following gait analysis (capturing step length and stance time asymmetry at self-selected (SSWS) and fast walking speeds (FWS)), participants completed performance-based measures (i.e. Timed Up and Go (TUG), the 10-Meter Walk Test (10mwt), and the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)).

Results

Step length and stance time asymmetry (at SSWS and FWS) were significantly correlated with each performance-based measure (p < .001 to p = .035). Overall, models with gait measures obtained at SSWS explained 40.1%, 46.8% and 40.1% of the variance in TUG-time (p = .022), 10mwt-speed (p = .003) and 6MWT-distance (p = .010), respectively. Models with gait measures obtained at FWS explained 70.0%, 59.8% and 51.8% of the variance in TUG-time (p < .001), 10mwt-speed (p < .001), and 6MWT-distance (p < .001), respectively.

Conclusions

Increases in step length or stance time asymmetry are associated with increased TUG-time, slower 10mwt-speed, and reduced 6MWT-distance. Findings suggest gait asymmetry may be a factor in poor functional outcomes following lower-limb amputation.

SUBMITTER: Seth M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9013390 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gait asymmetry is associated with performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.

Seth Mayank M Coyle Peter C PC Pohlig Ryan T RT Beisheim Emma H EH Horne John R JR Hicks Gregory E GE Sions Jaclyn Megan JM

Physiotherapy theory and practice 20211017 13

<h4>Background</h4>Adults with lower-limb amputation walk with an asymmetrical gait and exhibit poor functional outcomes, which may negatively impact quality-of-life.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate associations between gait asymmetry and performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional study involving 38 adults with a unilateral transtibial (N = 24; 62.5 ± 10.5 years) or transfemoral amputation (N = 14; 59.9 ± 9.5 years) was conducted. F ...[more]

PMID: 34657569

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectivehe purpose of this study will be to determine the efficacy of error-manipulation gait training (error-augmentation or error-correction) to improve step length symmetry and secondary health outcomes in veterans with unilateral nontraumatic transtibial amputation (TTA).MethodsThis will be a 3-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, with baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments in a VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center. Participants are 54 US military veterans ranging in age from 50 to 85 years with a unilateral transtibial nontraumatic amputation. Participants will be randomized into 1 of 3 groups: error-augmentation training (EAT), error-correction training (ECT), or supervised walking (CTL). Each group will complete 8 split-belt treadmill walking training sessions of 25 minutes each over 4 weeks. The EAT group will walk with belts moving at asymmetrical speeds. The ECT group will walk to the cadence of a metronome and the split belts moving at symmetrical speeds. The CTL group will walk with symmetrical belt speeds and without feedback. Step length symmetry is the primary outcome and will be assessed using an asymmetry index during overground walking. Secondary outcomes include lower extremity joint work during treadmill walking, 6-Minute Walk Test performance, daily step count, participant-perceived disability, and residual-limb integumentary health. Outcomes will be assessed at preintervention, 1-week postintervention (primary endpoint), and 13 weeks postintervention.ImpactThis study protocol focuses on an understudied area of rehabilitation for patients with nontraumatic unilateral TTA who have high levels of spatiotemporal gait asymmetry and mobility impairment. The results of this study will inform future implementation of clinical gait training interventions to improve spatiotemporal gait symmetry and long-term health and disability outcomes in patients with nontraumatic unilateral TTA.

Project description:BackgroundIn addition to a range of functional impairments seen in individuals with a lower-limb amputation, this population is at a substantially elevated risk of falls. Studies postulate that the lack of sensory feedback from the prosthetic limb contributes heavily to these impairments, but the extent to which sensation affects functional measures remains unclear.Research questionThe purpose of this study is to determine how sensory impairments in the lower extremities relate to performance with common clinical functional measures of balance and gait in individuals with a lower-limb amputation. Here we evaluate the effects of somatosensory integrity to clinical and lab measures of static, reactive and dynamic balance, and gait stability.MethodsIn 20 individuals with lower-limb amputation (AMP) and 20 age and gender-matched able-bodied controls (CON), we evaluated the effects of sensory integrity (pressure, proprioception, and vibration) on measures of balance and gait. Static, reactive, and dynamic balance were assessed using the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Motor Control Test (MCT), and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), respectively. Gait stability was assessed through measures of step length asymmetry and step width variability. Sensation was categorized into intact or impaired sensation by pressure thresholds and differences across groups were analyzed.ResultsThere were significant differences between AMP and CON groups for reliance on vision for static balance in the SOT, MCT, and FGA (p < 0.01). Despite differences across groups, there were no significant differences within the AMP group based on intact or impaired sensation across all functional measures.SignificanceDespite being able to detect differences between able-bodied individuals and individuals with an amputation, these functional measures cannot distinguish between levels of impairment within participants with an amputation. These findings suggest that more challenging and robust metrics are needed to evaluate the effects of sensation and function in individuals with an amputation.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M), a self-report mobility measure for people with lower limb amputation (LLA).DesignCross-sectional study.SettingPrivate prosthetic clinics (n=37).ParticipantsCurrent lower limb prosthesis users (N=199; mean age ± SD, 55.4±14.3y; 71.4% men) were assessed before receiving a replacement prosthesis, prosthetic socket, and/or prosthetic knee.InterventionsNot applicable.Main outcome measuresConvergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants' PLUS-M T-scores and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance, including the Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP), timed Up and Go (TUG), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Known-groups construct validity was evaluated by comparing differences in PLUS-M T-scores among participants grouped by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL).ResultsPLUS-M T-scores demonstrated a moderate positive relationship with AMP scores (ρ=.54, P<.001) and a moderate negative relationship with TUG times (ρ=-.56, P<.001). The PLUS-M also showed a strong positive relationship with PEQ-MS scores (ρ=.78, P<.001), ABC Scale scores (ρ=.81, P<.001), and PROMIS-PF T-scores (ρ=.81, P<.001). Significant differences (P<.05) in PLUS-M T-scores were found among groups of people classified by different MFCLs.ConclusionsStudy results support the validity of the PLUS-M as a self-report measure of prosthetic mobility. Correlations between PLUS-M and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance indicate convergent construct validity. Similarly, significant differences in PLUS-M T-scores across MFCL groups provide evidence of known-groups construct validity. In summary, evidence indicates that PLUS-M has good construct validity among people with LLA.

Project description:BackgroundTo evaluate cycling participation and identify barriers and facilitators related to cycling participation in people with a lower limb amputation (LLA) in the Netherlands.MethodsA questionnaire was sent to adults with a LLA between March and August 2019 to obtain information regarding prosthesis, individual's characteristics, amputation, cycling barriers and facilitators, and prosthetic satisfaction. The questionnaires were distributed via 8 orthopedic workshops, post and were given directly. To find cycling predictors, variables associated with cycling (p < 0.1) were entered into a logistic regression analysis. Non-significant variables were removed manually.ResultsParticipants (n = 207, 71% males) had a mean age of 62.0 ± 13.0 years. The most frequent level of amputation was transtibial (42%), and trauma was the most frequent cause of amputation (43%). After the LLA, 141 participants (68%) cycled for recreation (80%), physical fitness (74%), and transport (50%). In the past six months, cyclists cycled for recreation (79%) and transport (66%). Most cycled less than once a day. Recreational cyclists cycled alone (75%) for a median duration of 45 min or 14 km per ride. Cyclists with a transportation purpose usually cycled to go shopping (80%) or to visit friends (68%), with a median duration of 20 min or five kilometers per ride. Cyclists reported more facilitators (median (IQR) = 5 (3, 7) than non-cyclists 0 (0, 3). The majority of cyclists reported a positive attitude toward cycling (89%) and cycled because of health benefits (81%). A dynamic foot (odds ratio: 5.2, 95% CI 2.0, 13.3) and a higher number of facilitators (odds ratio: 1.3, 95% CI 1.2, 1.5) positively predicted cycling, whereas the presence of other underlying diseases (odds ratio: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 0.9) negatively predicted cycling (R2: 40.2%).ConclusionIn the Netherlands, the majority of adults cycled after a LLA, mainly for recreational purposes. A dynamic foot, a higher number of facilitators, and no other underlying diseases increases the likelihood of cycling after a LLA. The results suggest that personal motivation and a higher mobility level could be the key to increasing cycling participation. Future research should determine the association between motivation, mobility levels, and cycling with a LLA.

Dataset Information

Gait asymmetry is associated with performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Gait asymmetry is associated with performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets