Dataset Information

Different Conformations Revealed by NMR Underlie Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Susceptibility to Meropenem and Imipenem among D179Y Variants of KPC β-Lactamase.

ABSTRACT: β-Lactamase-mediated resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a serious limitation in the treatment of Gram-negative bacteria harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). Herein, the basis of susceptibility to carbapenems and resistance to ceftazidime (CAZ) and CZA of the D179Y variant of KPC-2 and -3 was explored. First, we determined that resistance to CZA in a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli DH10B was not due to increased expression levels of the variant enzymes, as demonstrated by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Using timed mass spectrometry, the D179Y variant formed prolonged acyl-enzyme complexes with imipenem (IMI) and meropenem (MEM) in KPC-2 and KPC-3, which could be detected up to 24 h, suggesting that IMI and MEM act as covalent β-lactamase inhibitors more than as substrates for D179Y KPC-2 and -3. This prolonged acyl-enzyme complex of IMI and MEM by D179Y variants was not observed with wild-type (WT) KPCs. CAZ was studied and the D179Y variants also formed acyl-enzyme complexes (1 to 2 h). Thermal denaturation and differential scanning fluorimetry showed that the tyrosine substitution at position 179 destabilized the KPC β-lactamases (KPC-2/3 melting temperature [T_m] of 54 to 55°C versus D179Y T_m of 47.5 to 51°C), and the D179Y protein was 3% disordered compared to KPC-2 at 318 K. Heteronuclear ¹H/¹⁵N-heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy also revealed that the D179Y variant, compared to KPC-2, is partially disordered. Based upon these observations, we discuss the impact of disordering of the Ω loop as a consequence of the D179Y substitution. These conformational changes and disorder in the overall structure as a result of D179Y contribute to this unanticipated phenotype.

SUBMITTER: Taracila MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9017342 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Different Conformations Revealed by NMR Underlie Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Susceptibility to Meropenem and Imipenem among D179Y Variants of KPC β-Lactamase.

Taracila Magdalena A MA Bethel Christopher R CR Hujer Andrea M AM Papp-Wallace Krisztina M KM Barnes Melissa D MD Rutter Joseph D JD VanPelt Jamie J Shurina Ben A BA van den Akker Focco F Clancy Cornelius J CJ Nguyen M Hong MH Cheng Shaoji S Shields Ryan K RK Page Richard C RC Bonomo Robert A RA

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20220321 4

β-Lactamase-mediated resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a serious limitation in the treatment of Gram-negative bacteria harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). Herein, the basis of susceptibility to carbapenems and resistance to ceftazidime (CAZ) and CZA of the D179Y variant of KPC-2 and -3 was explored. First, we determined that resistance to CZA in a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli DH10B was not due to increased expression levels of the variant enzymes, as demonstr ...[more]

PMID: 35311523

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeKlebsiella pneumoniae, a gram-negative bacterium, poses a severe hazard to public health, with many bacterial hosts having developed resistance to most antibiotics in clinical use. The goal of this study was to look into the development of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems, including imipenem and meropenem, in a K. pneumonia strain expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-2 (KPC-2) variant, referred to as KPC-49.MethodsAfter 1 day of incubation of K1 on agar containing ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC = 16/4 mg/L), a second KPC-producing K. pneumoniae strain (K2) was recovered. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays, cloning assays, and whole genome sequencing were performed to analyse and evaluate antibiotic resistance phenotypes and genotypes.ResultsK. pneumoniae strain (K1), that produced KPC-2, was susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam but resistant to carbapenems. The K2 isolate harboured a novel bla KPC-49 variant, which differs from bla KPC-2 by a single nucleotide (C487A), and results in an arginine-serine substitution at amino acid position 163 (R163S). The mutant K2 strain was resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. We demonstrated the ability of KPC-49 to hydrolyse carbapenems, which may be attributed to high KPC-49 expression or presence of an efflux pump and/or absence of membrane pore proteins in K2. Furthermore, blaKPC-like was carried on an IncFII (pHN7A8)/IncR-type plasmid within a TnAs1-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-ISKpn6-bla KPC-ISKpn27 structure. The bla KPC-like gene was flanked by various insertion sequences and transposon elements, including the Tn3 family transposon, such as TnAs1, TnAs3, IS26, and IS481-ISKpn27.ConclusionNew KPC variants are emerging owing to sustained exposure to antimicrobials and modifications in their amino acid sequences. We demonstrated the drug resistance mechanisms of the new mutant strains through experimental whole genome sequencing combined with bioinformatics analysis. Enhanced understanding of laboratory and clinical features of infections due to K. pneumoniae of the new KPC subtype is key to early and accurate anti-infective therapy.

Project description:ObjectivesThe availability of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam have redefined contemporary treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections. We aimed to characterize and contrast the in vitro activity of these agents against genetically diverse KPC-Kp clinical isolates.MethodsWe analysed genomes of 104 non-consecutive KPC-Kp isolates and compared the in vitro antibiotic activity by KPC subtype and ompK36 genotype. MICs were determined in triplicate by CLSI methods. Twenty representative isolates were selected for time-kill analyses against physiological steady-state and trough concentrations, as well as 4× MIC for each agent.ResultsFifty-eight percent and 42% of isolates harboured KPC-2 and KPC-3, respectively. OmpK36 mutations were more common among KPC-2- compared with KPC-3-producing Kp (P < 0.0001); mutations were classified as IS5 insertion, glycine-aspartic acid insertion at position 134 (GD duplication) and other mutations. Compared to isolates with WT ompK36, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam MICs were elevated for isolates with IS5 by 2-, 4- and 16-fold, respectively (P < 0.05 for each). Against isolates with GD duplication, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam MICs were increased, but ceftazidime/avibactam MICs were not. In time-kill studies, ceftazidime/avibactam-mediated killing correlated with ceftazidime/avibactam MICs, and did not vary across ompK36 genotypes. Imipenem/relebactam was not bactericidal against any isolate at trough concentrations. At steady-state imipenem/relebactam concentrations, regrowth occurred more commonly for isolates with IS5 mutations. Log-kills were lower in the presence of meropenem/vaborbactam for isolates with GD duplication compared with IS5 mutations.ConclusionsOur investigation identified key genotypes that attenuate, to varying degrees, the in vitro activity for each of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors. Additional studies are needed to translate the importance of these observations into clinical practice.

Project description:We describe in vivo evolution of carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance by analyzing four longitudinal Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from a patient with pneumonia following antimicrobial treatment. The patient had fever, cough associated with expectoration, and new infiltration was found on the chest CT. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to investigate its dynamic change of resistance phenotype. Population analysis profile was performed to investigate the population of Klebsiella pneumoniae. The infection started with a KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae (ZRKP01, ceftazidime-avibactam-S/carbapenem-R). Then, after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment, the strain switched to D179Y mutant that is KPC-33 (ZRKP02, ceftazidime-avibactam-R/carbapenem-S), which restored carbapenem susceptibility. However, the restored carbapenem susceptibility in vivo was not stable and the subsequent use of imipenem against KPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae infection resulted in a reversion of KPC-2 producers (ZRKP03 and ZRKP04, ceftazidime-avibactam-S/carbapenem-R). Genetic analysis demonstrated that all four K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to sequence type 11and had identical capsular polysaccharide (KL47), identical porin genes, and same plasmid replicon types. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that four K. pneumoniae isolates showed a high degree of relatedness. Single nucleotide polymorphisms analysis indicated that the number of mutations observed in the KPC-33 isolate was more than in the wild-type KPC-2 isolates and the four KPC-Kp isolates evolved from a longitudinal evolution of K. pneumoniae harboring bla KPC-2 gene. This is the first report to observe the in vivo evolution of wild-type KPC-2 to KPC-33 and then the reversion to its original wild-type KPC-2. Through WGS, we demonstrated the role of selective pressure of antibiotic in the mutation and reversion of bla KPC genes, which leading to the dynamic change of KPC enzymes and the dynamic emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. Statement: Recently, studies reported the emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains. The KPC mutations mediating ceftazidime-avibactam resistance are generally associated with the restoration of carbapenem susceptibility. However, clinical significance of this observation is unclear. In this manuscript, we demonstrate the role of selective pressure of antibiotic in the mutation and reversion of bla KPC genes, which leading to the dynamic change of KPC enzymes and the dynamic emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to observe the in vivo evolution of wild-type KPC-2 to KPC-33 and then the reversion to its original wild-type KPC-2. It should be noted that understanding the clinical significance of this observation is of critical importance, and reversion to carbapenem susceptibility would not imply a potential role for carbapenems monotherapy. We hope our study will draw attention to clinicians, so that this agent can be used most effectively for the longest period of time.

Project description:Background: Avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam are β-lactamase inhibitors that proved their efficiency against KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Regarding their inhibitor activity towards Ambler’s class A extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and Ambler’s class C cephalosporinase (AmpC), they should be active on most of the carbapenem-resistant non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CR non-CPE). Objectives: Determine the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam and comparators against CR non-CPE. Methods: MICs to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, but also temocillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ertapenem, colistin, eravacycline and tigecycline were determined by broth microdilution (ThermoFisher) on a collection of 284 CR non-CPE (inhibition zone diameter < 22 mm to meropenem). Whole genome sequencing was performed on 90 isolates to assess the genetic diversity as well as resistome. Results: According to EUCAST breakpoints, susceptibility rates of ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem used at standard dose were 0.7%, 45.1%, 14.8% and 2.5%, respectively. Increased exposure of ceftazidime, imipenem and meropenem led to reach 3.5%, 68.3% and 67.7% susceptibility, respectively. Using the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, susceptibility rates of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam were 88.4%, 81.0% and 80.6%, respectively. Susceptibility rates of temocillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, tigecycline, eravacycline, and colistin were 0%, 4.6%, 27.8%, 54.9% and 90.1%. MICs distributions with and without the presence of the inhibitor demonstrated a better ability of avibactam and relebactam compared to vaborbactam to restore susceptibility to the associated β-lactam. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and to a lesser extent meropenem/vaborbactam against CR non-CPE. Moreover, to test all β-lactams/β-lactamases inhibitors combinations without a priori for CRE, non-CPE is crucial since resistance to one of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations does not predict resistance to another molecule, depending on the resistance mechanisms involved.

Dataset Information

Different Conformations Revealed by NMR Underlie Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Susceptibility to Meropenem and Imipenem among D179Y Variants of KPC β-Lactamase.

Publications

Different Conformations Revealed by NMR Underlie Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Susceptibility to Meropenem and Imipenem among D179Y Variants of KPC β-Lactamase.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets