Dataset Information

SCORE2 versus SCORE in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Recently, the Systematic Coronary Risk Assessment (SCORE), a well-known CV risk algorithm, has been updated to a new predictive model (SCORE2). This new algorithm improves the identification of individuals at high risk of developing CV disease across Europe. Since carotid atherosclerosis is a predictor of future CV events and CV death, our objective was to compare the predictive capacity of SCORE2 versus SCORE for the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in patients with SLE.

Methods

Two hundred and thirty-five individuals over 40 years of age diagnosed with SLE were consecutively recruited in this cross-sectional study. SCORE and SCORE2 were calculated. The relationship of SCORE and SCORE2 with each other, and with the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (both carotid plaque and carotid intima media thickness -cIMT-), was studied.

Results

SCORE2 and SCORE did not correlate with each other (Spearman's Rho = 0.125, p = 0.065). Although SCORE did not correlate with cIMT (Spearman's Rho = -0.022, p = 0.75), the correlation of SCORE2 with cIMT was statistically significant (Spearman's Rho = 0.367, p < 0.001). Similarly, SCORE did not show significant discrimination for the presence of carotid plaque [AUC = 0.521 (95% CI = 0.443-0.600)], while SCORE2 did [AUC = 0.720 (95% CI = 0.656-0.785)]. The difference between AUCs was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001), thus showing that the prediction capacity of SCORE2 was significantly higher than that of SCORE.

Conclusion

In SLE patients, the ability of SCORE2 to predict the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis is higher than that of SCORE. According to our results, SCORE2, rather than SCORE, should be used in the CV risk stratification of patients with SLE. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

SUBMITTER: Quevedo-Abeledo JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9021470 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

SCORE2 <i>versus</i> SCORE in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Quevedo-Abeledo Juan Carlos JC González-Gay Miguel Á MÁ Ferraz-Amaro Iván I

Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 20220419

<h4>Introduction</h4>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Recently, the Systematic Coronary Risk Assessment (SCORE), a well-known CV risk algorithm, has been updated to a new predictive model (SCORE2). This new algorithm improves the identification of individuals at high risk of developing CV disease across Europe. Since carotid atherosclerosis is a predictor of future CV events and CV death, our objective was to compare th ...[more]

PMID: 35464811

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveIncomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) involves clinical and/or serologic manifestations consistent with but insufficient for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification. Because the nature of ILE is poorly understood and no treatment recommendations exist, we examined the clinical manifestations, medication history, and immunologic features in a diverse collection of ILE and SLE patients.MethodsMedical records of subjects enrolled in the Lupus Family Registry and Repository were reviewed for medication history and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria to identify ILE patients (3 ACR criteria; n = 440) and SLE patients (≥4 ACR criteria; n = 3,397). Participants completed the Connective Tissue Disease Screening Questionnaire. Anticardiolipin and plasma B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) by indirect immunofluorescence, and 13 autoantibodies by bead-based assays.ResultsOn average, ILE patients were older than SLE patients (46.2 years versus 42.0 years; P < 0.0001), and fewer ILE patients were African American (23.9% versus 32.2%; P < 0.001). ILE patients exhibited fewer autoantibody specificities than SLE patients (1.3 versus 2.6; P < 0.0001) and were less likely to have ANA titers ≥1:1,080 (10.5% versus 19.5%; P < 0.0001). BLyS levels were intermediate in ILE patients (controls < ILE; P = 0.016; ILE < SLE; P = 0.008). Pericarditis, renal, or neurologic manifestations occurred in 12.5% of ILE patients and were associated with non-European American race/ethnicity (P = 0.012). Hydroxychloroquine use increased over time, but was less frequent in ILE than SLE patients (65.2% versus 83.1%; P < 0.0001).ConclusionAlthough usually characterized by milder symptoms, ILE manifestations may require immunomodulatory treatments. Longitudinal studies are necessary to understand how ILE affects organ damage and future SLE risk, and to delineate molecular pathways unique to ILE.