Dataset Information

Estimation of older-adult mortality from information distorted by systematic age misreporting.

ABSTRACT: Testing theories about human senescence and longevity demands accurate information on older-adult mortality; this is rare in low- to middle-income countries where raw data may be distorted by defective completeness and systematic age misreporting. For this reason, such populations are frequently excluded from empirical tests of mortality and longevity theories, thus limiting their reach, as they reflect only a small and selected human mortality experience. In this paper we formulate an integrated method to compute estimates of older-adult mortality when vital registration and population counts are defective due to inaccurate coverage and/or systematic age misreporting. The procedure is validated with a simulation study that identifies a strategy to compute adjustments, which, under some assumptions, performs quite well. While the paper focuses on Latin American and Caribbean countries, the method is quite general and, with additional information and some model reformulation, could be applied to other populations with similar problems.

SUBMITTER: Palloni A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9026698 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Estimation of older-adult mortality from information distorted by systematic age misreporting.

Palloni Alberto A Beltrán-Sánchez Hiram H Pinto Guido G

Population studies 20210518 3

Testing theories about human senescence and longevity demands accurate information on older-adult mortality; this is rare in low- to middle-income countries where raw data may be distorted by defective completeness and systematic age misreporting. For this reason, such populations are frequently excluded from empirical tests of mortality and longevity theories, thus limiting their reach, as they reflect only a small and selected human mortality experience. In this paper we formulate an integrate ...[more]

PMID: 34002662

Similar Datasets

Project description:RationaleAs the older adult population increases, understanding the health effects of bias against older adults is increasingly important. Whether structural forms of age bias predict worse health has received limited attention.ObjectiveWe hypothesized that communities with greater age bias would have higher mortality among residents aged 65 and older. We expected the association to be unique to age bias, rather than general bias (i.e., sexual minority and racial bias), and that the age bias-mortality association would be strongest in predominantly White and younger communities.MethodsExplicit and implicit attitudes toward older adults (N = 1,001,735), sexual minorities (N = 791,966), and Black Americans (N = 2,255,808) were drawn from Project Implicit. Post-stratification relative to U.S. Census demographics was executed to improve the representativeness of county-level explicit and implicit bias estimates. County older adult mortality, estimated cross-sectionally with and longitudinally relative to bias scores, served as outcomes. Models controlled for relevant county-level covariates (e.g., median age) and included all U.S. counties (N = 3142).ResultsContrary to hypotheses but consistent with prior work, explicit age bias was cross-sectionally and longitudinally associated with lower mortality, over and above covariates and generalized community bias. The explicit age bias-lower mortality association only emerged in younger counties but did not depend on county ethnic composition. Implicit age bias was unassociated with outcomes. Post-hoc analyses supported that ageist communities may be associated with better health across the lifespan. Explicit age bias predicted lower mortality in young and middle adulthood; better mental health in middle adulthood, but not exercise or self-rated health, mediated the explicit age bias-older adult mortality association.ConclusionsResults highlight the uniqueness of older age relative to other stigmatized identities. Further examination of the association of community-level age bias with better health may improve longevity for all communities.

Project description:BackgroundOlder adults (aged >65 years) are disproportionately affected by cancer at a time when Canadians are surviving cancer in an unprecedented fashion. Contrary to persistent ageist assumptions, not only do the majority of older adult cancer survivors use digital health technologies (DHTs) regularly, such technologies also serve as important sources of their health information. Although older adults' transition to cancer survivorship is connected to the availability and provision of relevant and reliable information, little evidence exists as to how they use DHTs to supplement their understanding of their unique situation to manage, and make decisions about, their ongoing cancer-related concerns.ObjectiveThis pilot study, which examined older adult cancer survivors' use of DHTs, was conducted to support a larger study designed to explore how digital health literacy dimensions might affect the management of cancer survivorship sequelae. Understanding DHT use is also an important consideration for digital health literacy. Thus, we sought to investigate older adult cancer survivors' perceptions of DHTs in the context of accessing information about their health, health care systems, and health care providers.MethodsA qualitative pilot study, which involved semistructured interviews with older adult cancer survivors (N=5), was conducted to explore how participants interacted with, accessed, and searched for information, as well as how DHT use related to their cancer survivorship. Institutional ethics approval (#21-0421) was obtained. Interpretive description inquiry-a practice-based approach suitable for generating applied knowledge-supported exploration of the research question. Thematic analysis was used to examine the transcripts for patterns of meaning (themes).ResultsAssessing the credibility of digital information remains challenging for older adult cancer survivors. Identified benefits of DHTs included improved access to meet health information needs, older adult cancer survivors feeling empowered to make informed decisions regarding their health trajectory, and the ability to connect with interdisciplinary teams for care continuity. Additionally, participants described feeling disconnected when DHTs seemed to be used as substitutes for human interaction. The results of this pilot study were used to create 12 additional questions to supplement a digital health literacy survey, through which we will seek a more fulsome account of the relationship between digital health literacy and DHTs for older adult cancer survivors.ConclusionsOverall, this pilot study confirmed the utility of DHTs in enhancing the connection of older adult cancer survivors to their health care needs. Importantly, this connection exists on a continuum, and providing greater access to technologies, in combination with human support, leads to feelings of empowerment. DHTs are an important aspect of contemporary health care; yet, these technologies must be seen as complementary and not as replacements for human interaction. Otherwise, we risk dehumanizing patients and disconnecting them from the care that they need and deserve.

Dataset Information

Estimation of older-adult mortality from information distorted by systematic age misreporting.

Publications

Estimation of older-adult mortality from information distorted by systematic age misreporting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets