Dataset Information

Developing an interprofessional people-centred care model for home-living older people with multimorbidities in a primary care health centre: A community-based study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The ageing population with multiple conditions and complex health needs has forced healthcare systems to rethink the optimal way of delivering services. Instead of trying to manage numerous diseases in a siloed approach, the emphasis should be on people-centred practice, in which healthcare services are tailored to people's needs and provided in partnership with them.

Objective

The aim was to develop an interprofessional people-centred care model (PCCM), including the contribution of a clinically trained pharmacist for home-living multimorbid older people in primary care.

Methods

Participatory action research method, including the active involvement of healthcare professionals, was utilised to develop the PCCM in a public health centre in Finland. The data comprised interview transcripts, workshop materials, field notes, surveys, and memos and were analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results

The PCCM was developed in iterative phases, including planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The PCCM comprised: 1) A self-management evaluation questionnaire sent before a home visit; 2) A person-centred patient interview at home with a named nurse and a pharmacist; 3) A nurse-led health review and a pharmacist-led clinical medication review; 4) An interprofessional (a GP, a pharmacist and a named nurse) case conference meeting; 5) A care plan, including health and medication plans; and 6) Health support and empowerment interventions. The PCCM shifted working practices in the health centre from parallel and consultative practice towards interprofessional people-centred practice and more holistic care. The patient's active involvement in their own care was encouraged. Healthcare professionals appreciated the advantages of the new skill-mix, including the clinically trained pharmacist. Building trust among healthcare professionals and between the professionals and the patients was essential.

Conclusion

The successfully developed PCCM improved holistic and more people-centred care in primary care. Healthcare professionals appreciated the advantages of the skill mix and found that trust was essential for implementing the PCCM.

SUBMITTER: Kari H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9030719 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Developing an interprofessional people-centred care model for home-living older people with multimorbidities in a primary care health centre: A community-based study.

Kari Heini H Kortejärvi Hanna H Laaksonen Raisa R

Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy 20220205

<h4>Background</h4>The ageing population with multiple conditions and complex health needs has forced healthcare systems to rethink the optimal way of delivering services. Instead of trying to manage numerous diseases in a siloed approach, the emphasis should be on people-centred practice, in which healthcare services are tailored to people's needs and provided in partnership with them.<h4>Objective</h4>The aim was to develop an interprofessional people-centred care model (PCCM), including the c ...[more]

PMID: 35478508

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPeople receiving home care usually have complex healthcare needs requiring the involvement of informal caregivers and various health professionals. In this context, successful collaboration is an important element of person-centred care, which is often insufficiently implemented. Consequences might be found in avoidable hospitalisations. The aim of the study is to develop a care concept to improve person-centred interprofessional collaboration for people receiving home care considering the perspectives of all person groups involved.Methods and analysisThis study uses a mixed-methods design consisting of a literature review, several qualitative inquiries, a cross-sectional quantitative study and a final structured workshop. After a literature review (work package (WP) 1), we will explore the perspectives of people receiving home care (n=20), their relatives (n=20) and representatives of statutory health insurances (n=5) in semistructured interviews (WP2). Moreover, 100 individuals of each group (people receiving home care, relatives, registered nurses, general practitioners and therapists) involved in home care will answer a survey on collaboration that will be analysed descriptively (WP3). Additionally, monoprofessional focus groups (n=9) of registered nurses, general practitioners and therapists, respectively, will discuss current practices. Data will be analysed by qualitative content analysis. Best practice cases (n=8) will be analysed by a case-based qualitative content analysis based on data of observations of home visits and interviews (WP4). The findings of WP2 will be discussed in mixed focus groups (n=4) with 10 participants each (WP5). Considering the results of joint displays of WP3, WP4 and WP5, the interprofessional care concept and its implementation will be elaborated in an expert workshop (WP6).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from all ethics committees of the project partners. Study results will be disseminated through publications, conference presentations, student education and advanced training of health professionals.Trial registration numberNCT05149937.

Project description:In many integrated care programs, a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is conducted to identify older people's problems and care needs. Different ways for conducting a CGA are in place. However, it is still unclear which CGA instruments and procedures for conducting them are used in integrated care programs, and what distinguishes them from each other. Furthermore, it is yet unknown how and to what extent CGAs, as a component of integrated care programs, actually reflect the main principles of integrated care, being comprehensiveness, multidisciplinarity and person-centredness. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (a) describe and compare different CGA instruments and procedures conducted within integrated care programs for older people living at home, and (b) describe how the principles of integrated care were applied in these CGAs. A scoping review of the scientific literature on CGAs in the context of integrated care was conducted for the period 2006-2018. Data were extracted on main characteristics of the identified CGA instruments and procedures, and on how principles of integrated care were applied in these CGAs. Twenty-seven integrated care programs were included in this study, of which most were implemented in the Netherlands and the United States. Twenty-one different CGAs were identified, of which the EASYcare instrument, RAI-HC/RAI-CHA and GRACE tool were used in multiple programs. The majority of CGAs seemed to reflect comprehensiveness, multidisciplinarity and person-centredness, although the way and extent to which principles of integrated care were incorporated differed between the CGAs. This study highlights the high variability of CGA instruments and procedures used in integrated care programs. This overview of available CGAs and their characteristics may promote (inter-)national exchange of CGAs, which could enable researchers and professionals in choosing from the wide range of existing CGAs, thereby preventing them from unnecessarily reinventing the wheel.

Project description:BackgroundMany older people live at home, often with complex and chronic health and social care needs. Integrated care programs are increasingly being implemented as a way to better address these needs. To support older people living at home, it is also essential to maintain their safety. Integrated care programs have the potential to address a wide range of risks and problems that could undermine older people's ability to live independently at home. The aim of this scoping review is to provide insight into how integrated care programs address safety risks faced by older people living at home - an area that is rather underexplored.MethodsSafety was conceptualised as preventing or reducing the risk of problems, associated with individual functioning and behaviour, social and physical environments, and health and social care management, which could undermine older people's ability to live independently at home. For this scoping review a systematic literature search was performed to identify papers describing integrated care programs where at least one intervention component addressed safety risks. Data were extracted on the programs' characteristics, safety risks addressed, and the activities and interventions used to address them.ResultsNone of the 11 programs included in this review explicitly mentioned safety in their goals. Nevertheless, following the principles of our conceptual framework, the programs appeared to address risks in multiple domains. Most attention was paid to risks related to older people's functioning, behaviour, and the health and social care they receive. Risks related to people's physical and social environments received less attention.ConclusionEven though prevention of safety risks is not an explicit goal of integrated care programs, the programs address a wide range of risks on multiple domains. The need to address social and environmental risks is becoming increasingly important given the growing number of people receiving care and support at home. Prioritising a multidimensional approach to safety in integrated care programs could enhance the ability of health and social care systems to support older people to live safely at home.

Project description:BackgroundOlder people are more likely to be living with cancer and multiple long-term conditions, but their needs, preferences for treatments, health priorities and lifestyle are often not identified or well-understood. There is a need to move towards a more comprehensive person-centred approach to care that focuses on the cumulative impact of a number of conditions on daily activities and quality of life. This paper describes the intervention planning process for CHAT& PLANTM, a structured conversation intervention to promote personalised care and support self-management in older adults with complex conditions.MethodsA theory-, evidence- and person-based approach to intervention development was undertaken. The intervention planning and development process included reviewing relevant literature and existing guidelines, developing guiding principles, conducting a behavioural analysis and constructing a logic model. Optimisation of the intervention and its implementation involved qualitative interviews with older adults with multimorbidity (n = 8), family caregivers (n = 2) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 20). Data were analysed thematically and informed changes to the intervention prototype.ResultsReview findings reflected the importance of HCPs taking a person-centred (rather than disease-centred) approach to their work with older people living with multimorbidity. This approach involves HCPs giving health service users the opportunity to voice their priorities, then using these to underpin the treatment and care plan that follow. Findings from the planning stage indicated that taking a structured approach to interactions between HCPs and health service users would enable elicitation of individual concerns, development of a plan tailored to that individual, negotiation of roles and review of goals as individual priorities change. In the optimisation stage, older adults and HCPs commented on the idea of a structured conversation to promote person-centred care and on its feasibility in practice. The idea of a shared, person-centred approach to care was viewed positively. Concerns were raised about possible extra work for those receiving or delivering care, time and staffing, and risk of creating another "tick-box" exercise for staff. Participants concluded that anyone with the appropriate skills could potentially deliver the intervention, but training was likely to be required to ensure correct utilisation and self-efficacy to deliver to the intervention.ConclusionsCHAT&PLAN, a structured person-centred conversation guide appears acceptable and appealing to HCPs and older adults with multimorbidity. Further development of the CHAT&PLAN intervention should focus on ensuring that staff are adequately trained and supported to implement the intervention.

Project description:Background and aimsOlder (≥ 50 years) persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) comprise the majority of individuals receiving HIV care in high-income countries. PLWH experience the challenges of aging at earlier ages and accelerated rates, compared to people without HIV. Older PLWH who may benefit from more support may hesitate due to fear of stigma, discrimination, or past experiences.MethodsWe assessed the views of older PLWH through an online survey. We sought participants' views, experiences, knowledge and preferences for delivery of continuing care support in Alberta, Canada. Participants were invited during clinic visits at the Southern Alberta Clinic in Calgary, Canada.ResultsA total of 316 participants completed the survey. The mean age was 61 years (standard deviation ± 8) and 83.5% (n = 264) were men. Ten percent of participants (n = 32) currently receive help with activities of daily living, 70% of which was provided by family/friends. Nine percent expressed concern with receiving help, including financial (54%), loss of independence (31%), and privacy concerns (31%). Nearly 47% expressed concern about healthcare providers' knowledge of HIV, 63% expressed concern about their medical information being kept confidential, and 64% expressed concern about other residents learning of their HIV diagnosis.ConclusionsDespite a need, many older PLWH are hesitant to accept home care or move into supportive, facility-based living. This leaves a potential void in the necessary provision of care. This must be addressed to ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion, and to remove barriers in accessing health and social supports. The solutions to this urgent need lie with those with lived experience who can inform healthcare providers and policy-makers. To start, healthcare providers and policymakers must educate staff about the ongoing stigma and discrimination experienced by older PLWH and demonstrate to patients the value placed on patient privacy and confidentiality.Impact statementWe certify that this work is novel clinical research that provides insight into the values and preferences of older people living with HIV regarding continuing care (from home care to supportive living and long-term care). This work is the foundation for creating meaningful, structural changes to how continuing care is provided to older people living with HIV, an underrepresented and equity-deserving group. Despite a need, many older PLWH are hesitant to accept home care or move into supportive, facility-based living. This leaves a potential void in the necessary provision of care. This must be addressed to ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion, and to remove barriers in accessing health and social supports. To start, healthcare providers and policymakers must educate staff about the ongoing stigma and discrimination experienced by older PLWH and demonstrate to patients the value placed on patient privacy and confidentiality.

Dataset Information

Developing an interprofessional people-centred care model for home-living older people with multimorbidities in a primary care health centre: A community-based study.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Developing an interprofessional people-centred care model for home-living older people with multimorbidities in a primary care health centre: A community-based study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets