Dataset Information

Biomechanical Analysis of Unstable Osteochondral Fragment Fixation Using Three Different Techniques: Osteochondral Plug, Bioabsorbable Pin, and Suture Anchor with Tape.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare the initial fixation strength of osteochondral fragment fixations using osteochondral plugs, bioabsorbable pins, and knotless suture anchors.

Methods

Eighteen fresh-frozen immature (6 month old) porcine knees were used. An osteochondral fragment, cut from the articular surface of the medial femoral condyle to achieve a thickness of 5 mm, was used to mimic the unstable osteochondral fragment. It was fixed using three techniques, including two osteochondral plugs (osteochondral plug group), four full-threaded poly l-lactic acid pins (bioabsorbable pin group), and three suture anchors with a 2-0 tape (suture anchor group). Tensile loads at displacements of 1 and 2 mm and ultimate failure load were measured at a cross-head speed of 100 mm/min, and the variables of the three groups were compared statistically using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's honestly significant difference test.

Results

There was no significant difference in the tensile load to achieve 1-mm displacement. The load to achieve 2-mm displacement and the ultimate failure load were significantly greater in the suture anchor group than the osteochondral plug group and the bioabsorbable pin group.

Conclusions

Single-pull destructive testing of a fixed articular osteochondral fragment with the force perpendicular to the articular surface, demonstrated no statistical difference in the tensile load to achieve 1-mm displacement, but the load to achieve 2-mm displacement was significantly greater for the three suture anchor-interlocking 2-0 tape constructs than the dual osteochondral plug fixation and the four bioabsorbable pin fixation constructs. Additionally, the three suture anchor-interlocking 2-0 tape construct's mean single-pull failure load was greater than other two fixation procedures.

Clinical relevance

To achieve osteochondral fragment union, sufficient fixation strength is critical. However, the initial fixation strength of osteochondral plugs, bioabsorbable pins, and knotless suture anchors for unstable osteochondral lesions remains unclear.

SUBMITTER: Sasaki S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9042741 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Biomechanical Analysis of Unstable Osteochondral Fragment Fixation Using Three Different Techniques: Osteochondral Plug, Bioabsorbable Pin, and Suture Anchor with Tape.

Sasaki Shizuka S Yamauchi Shohei S Sasaki Eiji E Kimura Yuka Y Takahashi Akane A Ishibashi Yasuyuki Y

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation 20220201 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the initial fixation strength of osteochondral fragment fixations using osteochondral plugs, bioabsorbable pins, and knotless suture anchors.<h4>Methods</h4>Eighteen fresh-frozen immature (6 month old) porcine knees were used. An osteochondral fragment, cut from the articular surface of the medial femoral condyle to achieve a thickness of 5 mm, was used to mimic the unstable osteochondral fragment. It was fixed using three techniques, including two osteochondral plugs ...[more]

PMID: 35494288

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the biomechanical influence of differential loading of suture strands (torque) on the fixation strength of knotted and knotless all-suture anchors.MethodsThe biomechanical strength of 48 all-suture anchors was evaluated for 4 conditions in polyurethane foam blocks: (1) 12 knotted all-suture anchors loaded proportionately, (2) 12 knotted all-suture anchors with 1 suture strand bearing 50% of total force (partial torque), (3) 12 knotted all-suture anchors with 1 strand fixated and the other loaded (full torque), and (4) 12 knotless all-suture anchors with the loop kept open via a fixed rod. Force for 1 mm and 2 mm of displacement and ultimate failure load were assessed.ResultsFor 1 mm of displacement, groups 2, 3, and 4 showed significantly lower forces than group 1 (all P < .001), with no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P = .516); for 2 mm of displacement, all groups showed significantly lower forces than group 1 (P < .001), which positively correlated with applied torque. No differences in the mean ultimate loads observed between testing groups 1, 2, and 4 were noted, with 93.3 ± 3.8 N, 91.4 ± 4.7 N, and 92.6 ± 5.6 N, respectively; however, group 3 exhibited a significantly lower mean ultimate load (62.3 ± 1.7 N) than all other groups (P < .001).ConclusionsThe ultimate failure load of knotted and knotless all-suture anchor fixation was partially affected by loading differentials between strands in this validated foam block model. Differential loading of knotted all-suture anchor fixation presented greater initial displacement when compared with symmetrically loaded knotted all-suture anchors. Despite an initial increase in displacement, knotless all-suture anchors showed similar ultimate failure loads to knotted all-suture anchors with strands loaded equally.Clinical relevanceThe role of suture strand loading imbalance on anchor fixation is variable and should be considered during placement and fixation of the repair constructs in a clinical setting.

Project description:PurposeTo compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model.MethodsTwenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees were used in this study. Specimens were randomly distributed among 3 groups: (1) native meniscus groups, (2) interference fixation, and (3) transosseous suture fixation. In each group, the posterior segments of the tested medial menisci were gripped with the freeze clamps and fixed to the tensile testing machine. Samples were preconditioned, followed by cyclic tension-relaxation for 1000 cycles between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz and finally pulled to failure at a rate of 0.55 mm/s. The cyclic elongation, stiffness to failure, mode, and ultimate load to failure were recorded.ResultsThere was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the interference fixation (169.71 ± 71.98 N) and transosseous suture fixation (222.73 ± 72.40 N) groups (P = .118), both were significantly less than that of the native meniscus (405.46 ± 95.62) (P < .001). Interference fixation displayed cyclic elongation (1.04 ± 0.71 mm) and stiffness (69.10 ± 25.8 N/mm) that were not significantly different from the native meniscus tissue (0.78 ± 0.53 mm and 83.1 ±26.28 N/mm) (P = .359 and P = .224), in comparison to transosseous suture fixation, which did show increased cyclic elongation (1.85 ± 1.44 mm) (P = .047) and decreased stiffness (34.72 ± 10.2 N/mm) (P < .001).ConclusionInterference fixation of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus has superior cyclic elongation and stiffness when compared to transosseous suture fixation. Interference fixation and the native meniscus model have a similar stiffness and cyclic elongation.Clinical relevanceThe significance of our study is that using interference fixation for meniscal allograft transplantation has the potential to reduce short term surgical failures as well as long term complication rates.

Dataset Information

Biomechanical Analysis of Unstable Osteochondral Fragment Fixation Using Three Different Techniques: Osteochondral Plug, Bioabsorbable Pin, and Suture Anchor with Tape.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Publications

Biomechanical Analysis of Unstable Osteochondral Fragment Fixation Using Three Different Techniques: Osteochondral Plug, Bioabsorbable Pin, and Suture Anchor with Tape.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets