Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients.


ABSTRACT:

Aim

To independently assess the impact of mandatory testing using an extended DPYD variant panel (ToxNav®) and consequent dose adjustment of Capecitabine/5-FU on recorded quantitative toxicity, symptoms of depression, and hospital costs.

Methods

We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match 466 patients tested with ToxNav® with 1556 patients from a historical cohort, and performed regression analysis to estimate the impact of ToxNav®on toxicity, depression, and hospital costs.

Results

ToxNav® appeared to reduce the likelihood of experiencing moderate (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.45-0.77) and severe anaemia (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33-0.90), and experience of pain for more than 4 days a week (OR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.30-0.83), while it increased the likelihood of mild neutropenia (OR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.27-2.35). It also reduced the cost of chemotherapy by 12% (95%CI: 3-31) or £9765, the cost of non-elective hospitalisation by 23% (95%CI: 8-36) or £2331, and the cost of critical care by 21% (95%CI: 2-36) or £1219 per patient. For the DPYD variant associated with critical risk of toxicity (rs3918290), the improved non-elective hospital costs were > £20,000, whereas variants associated with hand-foot syndrome toxicity had no detectable cost improvement.

Conclusion

Upfront testing of DPYD variants appears to reduce the toxicity burden of Capecitabine and 5-FU in cancer patients and can lead to substantial hospital cost savings, only if the dose management of the drugs in response to variants detected is standardised and regulated.

SUBMITTER: Tsiachristas A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9044697 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients.

Tsiachristas Apostolos A   Vallance Grant G   Koleva-Kolarova Rositsa R   Taylor Harriet H   Solomons Luke L   Rizzo Giovanni G   Chaytor Catherine C   Miah Junel J   Wordsworth Sarah S   Hassan A Bassim AB  

BMC cancer 20220426 1


<h4>Aim</h4>To independently assess the impact of mandatory testing using an extended DPYD variant panel (ToxNav®) and consequent dose adjustment of Capecitabine/5-FU on recorded quantitative toxicity, symptoms of depression, and hospital costs.<h4>Methods</h4>We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match 466 patients tested with ToxNav® with 1556 patients from a historical cohort, and performed regression analysis to estimate the impact of ToxNav®on toxicity, depression, and hospital costs.<  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8870563 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11837876 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9463069 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5564608 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6316498 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8908223 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10786722 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10496767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11300675 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10134304 | biostudies-literature