Great Expectations with Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Hope or Hype?A commentary on the article 'Operator independent reliability of direct augmented reality navigated pedicle screw placement and rod bending' by Farshad et al.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Garg B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9079716 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Great Expectations with Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Hope or Hype?A commentary on the article 'Operator independent reliability of direct augmented reality navigated pedicle screw placement and rod bending' by Farshad et al.
North American Spine Society journal 20220421
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAR based navigation of spine surgeries may not only provide accurate surgical execution but also operator independency by compensating for potential skill deficits. "Direct" AR-navigation, namely superposing trajectories on anatomy directly, have not been investigated regarding their accuracy and operator's dependence.Purpose of this study was to prove operator independent reliability and accuracy of both AR assisted pedicle screw navigation and AR assisted rod bending in a cadaver setting.MethodsTwo experienced spine surgeons and two biomedical engineers (laymen) performed independently from each other pedicle screw instrumentations from L1-L5 in a total of eight lumbar cadaver specimens (20 screws/operator) using a fluoroscopy-free AR based navigation method. Screw fitting rods from L1 to S2-Ala-Ileum were bent bilaterally using an AR based rod bending navigation method (4 rods/operator). Outcome measures were pedicle perforations, accuracy compared to preoperative plan, registration time, navigation time, total rod bending time and operator's satisfaction for these procedures.Results97.5% of all screws were safely placed (<2 mm perforation), overall mean deviation from planned trajectory was 6.8±3.9°, deviation from planned entry point was 4±2.7 mm, registration time per vertebra was 2:25 min (00:56 to 10:00 min), navigation time per screw was 1:07 min (00:15 to 12:43 min) rod bending time per rod was 4:22 min (02:07 to 10:39 min), operator's satisfaction with AR based screw and rod navigation was 5.38±0.67 (1 to 6, 6 being the best rate). Comparison of surgeons and laymen revealed significant difference in navigation time (1:01 min; 00:15 to 3:00 min vs. 01:37 min; 00:23 to 12:43 min; p = 0.004, respectively) but not in pedicle perforation rate.ConclusionsDirect AR based screw and rod navigation using a surface digitization registration technique is reliable and independent of surgical experience. The accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine is comparable with the current standard techniques.
| S-EPMC8819958 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAugmented reality (AR) is a rising technology gaining increasing utility in medicine. By superimposing the surgical site and the operator's visual field with computer-generated information, it has the potential to enhance the cognitive skills of surgeons. This is the report of the first in man case with "direct holographic navigation" as part of a randomized controlled trial.Case descriptionA pointing instrument was equipped with a sterile fiducial marker, which was used to obtain a digital representation of the intraoperative bony anatomy of the lumbar spine. Subsequently, a previously validated registration method was applied to superimpose the surgery plan with the intraoperative anatomy. The registration result is shown in situ as a 3D AR hologram of the preoperative 3D vertebra model with the planned screw trajectory and entry point for validation and approval by the surgeon. After achieving alignment with the surgery plan, a borehole is drilled and the pedicle screw placed. Postoperativ computer tomography was used to measure accuracy of this novel method for surgical navigation.OutcomeCorrect screw positions entirely within bone were documented with a postoperative CT, with an accuracy similar to current standard of care methods for surgical navigation. The patient was mobilized uneventfully on the first postoperative day with little pain medication and dismissed on the fourth postoperative day.ConclusionThis first in man report of direct AR navigation demonstrates feasibility in vivo. The continuation of this randomized controlled study will evaluate the value of this novel technology.
| S-EPMC8819976 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Robot-assisted surgery is becoming popular in the operation room (OR) for, e.g., orthopedic surgery (among other surgeries). However, robotic executions related to surgical steps cannot simply rely on preoperative plans. Using pedicle screw placement as an example, extra adjustments are needed to adapt to the intraoperative changes when the preoperative planning is outdated. During surgery, adjusting a surgical plan is non-trivial and typically rather complex since the available interfaces used in current robotic systems are not always intuitive to use. Recently, thanks to technical advancements in head-mounted displays (HMD), augmented reality (AR)-based medical applications are emerging in the OR. The rendered virtual objects can be overlapped with real-world physical objects to offer intuitive displays of the surgical sites and anatomy. Moreover, the potential of combining AR with robotics is even more promising; however, it has not been fully exploited. In this paper, an innovative AR-based robotic approach is proposed and its technical feasibility in simulated pedicle screw placement is demonstrated. An approach for spatial calibration between the robot and HoloLens 2 without using an external 3D tracking system is proposed. The developed system offers an intuitive AR-robot interaction approach between the surgeon and the surgical robot by projecting the current surgical plan to the surgeon for fine-tuning and transferring the updated surgical plan immediately back to the robot side for execution. A series of bench-top experiments were conducted to evaluate system accuracy and human-related errors. A mean calibration error of 3.61 mm was found. The overall target pose error was 3.05 mm in translation and 1.12∘ in orientation. The average execution time for defining a target entry point intraoperatively was 26.56 s. This work offers an intuitive AR-based robotic approach, which could facilitate robotic technology in the OR and boost synergy between AR and robots for other medical applications.
| S-EPMC9605509 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To investigate the accuracy of augmented reality (AR) navigation using the Magic Leap head mounted device (HMD), pedicle screws were minimally invasively placed in four spine phantoms. AR navigation provided by a combination of a conventional navigation system integrated with the Magic Leap head mounted device (AR-HMD) was used. Forty-eight screws were planned and inserted into Th11-L4 of the phantoms using the AR-HMD and navigated instruments. Postprocedural CT scans were used to grade the technical (deviation from the plan) and clinical (Gertzbein grade) accuracy of the screws. The time for each screw placement was recorded. The mean deviation between navigation plan and screw position was 1.9 ± 0.7 mm (1.9 [0.3-4.1] mm) at the entry point and 1.4 ± 0.8 mm (1.2 [0.1-3.9] mm) at the screw tip. The angular deviation was 3.0 ± 1.4° (2.7 [0.4-6.2]°) and the mean time for screw placement was 130 ± 55 s (108 [58-437] s). The clinical accuracy was 94% according to the Gertzbein grading scale. The combination of an AR-HMD with a conventional navigation system for accurate minimally invasive screw placement is feasible and can exploit the benefits of AR in the perspective of the surgeon with the reliability of a conventional navigation system.
| S-EPMC8779462 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure--placement of thoracic pedicle screws.To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation.Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient.With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion z test yielded P = .08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement.The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.
| S-EPMC3153609 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe pedicle screw insertion technique has evolved significantly, and despite the challenges of precise placement, advancements like AR-based surgical navigation systems now offer enhanced accuracy and safety in spinal surgery by integrating real-time, high-resolution imaging with virtual models to aid surgeons. This study aims to evaluate the differences in accuracy between novel AR-guided pedicle screw insertion and conventional surgery techniques.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 2019 to December 2023 to compare the efficacy of AR-guided pedicle screw fixation with conventional freehand surgery using CT guidance. The study included 150 patients, aged 18-75, with 75 patients in each group. The total number of pedicle screws planned for the clinical trial placement was 351 and 348 in the experimental and control groups. The safety and efficacy of the procedures were evaluated by assessing screw placement accuracy and complication rates.ResultsIn the full analysis set (FAS) analysis, the difference in the excellent and good rates of screw placement (experimental group - control group) and 95% confidence interval was 6.3% [3.0%-9.8%], with a p value of 0.0003 for the superiority test. In the FAS sensitivity analysis, the success rate was 98.0% (344 out of 351) in the experimental group and 91.7% (319 out of 348) in the control group, with a difference and 95% confidence interval of 6.3% [2.9% and 9.8%, respectively]. In the per-protocol set (PPS) analysis, the difference in the excellent and good rates of screw placement between the experimental and control groups, and the 95% confidence interval was 6.4% [3.3%-9.5%], with a p value of 0.0001 for the superiority test. In the actual treatment set (ATS) analysis, the excellent and good rates of screw placement were 99.1% in the experimental group and 91.7% in the control group. The difference in the excellent and good rates of screw placement (experimental group - control group) and 95% confidence interval was 7.3% [4.1%-10.6%], with a p value of < 0.0001 for the superiority test.ConclusionsThe AR surgical navigation system can improve the accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and provide precise guidance for surgeons during pedicle screw insertion.
| S-EPMC11787979 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The field of radiation oncology is rapidly advancing through technological and biomedical innovation backed by robust research evidence. However, cancer professionals are notoriously time-poor, meaning there is a need for high quality, accessible and tailored oncologic education programs. While traditional teaching methods including lectures and other in-person delivery formats remain important, digital learning (DL) has provided additional teaching options that can be delivered flexibly and on-demand from anywhere in the world. While evidence of this digital migration has been evident for some time now, it has not always been met with the same enthusiasm by the teaching community, in part due to questions about its pedagogical effectiveness. Many of these reservations have been driven by a rudimentary utilisation of the medium and inexperience with digital best-practice. With increasing familiarity and understanding of the medium, increasingly sophisticated and pedagogically-driven learning solutions can be produced. This article will review the application of immersive digital learning tools in radiation oncology education. This includes first and second-generation Virtual Reality (VR) environments and Augmented Reality (AR). It will explore the data behind, and best-practice application of, each of these tools as well as giving practical tips for educators who are looking to implement (or refine) their use of these learning methods. It includes a discussion of how to match the digital learning methods to the content being taught and ends with a horizon scan of where the digital medium may take us in the future. This article is the second in a two-part series, with the companion piece being on Screen-Based Digital Learning Methods in Radiation Oncology. Overall, the digital space is well-placed to cater to the evolving educational needs of oncology learners. Further uptake over the next decade is likely to be driven by the desire for flexible on demand delivery, high-yield products, engaging delivery methods and programs that are tailored to individual learning needs. Educational programs that embrace these principles will have unique opportunities to thrive in this space.
| S-EPMC9508152 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is an increase in the volume of elective lumbar fusion surgeries. Various techniques have been described however the literature on cost comparisons of different fusion techniques is sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate resource utilisation of single position (SP) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) compared to dual position (DP) LLIF.MethodsThis retrospective study included all patients who underwent single-stage anterior to psoas (ATP) LLIF with navigated percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation by the senior author between September 2020 and September 2023. Demographic details, operative variables (duration of surgery, SP/DP) and complications (intra-operative, post-operative) were included. Variables related to resource usage included length of stay, implant fee, consumables fee, anaesthetist fee and facility fee.ResultsThere were 6 patients in the SP group and 14 patients in the DP group. None of the patients had intra-operative complications. SP group was associated with a 44.6% decrease in the length of stay (P=0.023) compared to the DP group, holding CCI and levels constant. The median operative time for the SP and DP groups were 150 and 282.5 min respectively (P<0.001). The median consumables fee ($2,509 vs. $3,839, P<0.001) for the SP group were lower than the DP group.ConclusionsSP LLIF with navigated PPS insertion described in this paper is a minimally invasive technique with reduced resource usage compared to DP LLIF.
| S-EPMC11467288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCement-augmentation pedicle screws have been widely used in spinal internal fixation surgery combined with osteoporosis in recent years, which can significantly improve the fixation strength, but compared with conventional methods, whether it has more advantages is still inconclusive of evidencebased medicine. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented pedicle screw in the treatment of thoracolumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published from the establishment of the database up until June 2023. We included studies that concerning the cement-augmented pedicle screw and the traditional pedicle screw placement for thoracolumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis. We excluded repeated publication, researches without full text, incomplete information or inability to conduct data extraction and animal experiments, case report, reviews and systematic reviews. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyze the data.ResultsA total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The sample size of patients were totally 881, of which, 492 patients in cement-augmented screw group and 389 patients in conventional screw group. Meta-analysis results showed that Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (WMD = 1.69, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.22), intervertebral space height (WMD = 1.66, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.29) and post-operation fusion rate (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.49 to 5.25) were higher in the cement-augmented screw group than those in the conventional screw group. Operation time was longer in the cement-augmented screw group than that in the conventional screw group (WMD = 15.47, 95% CI 1.25 to 29.70). Screw loosening rate was lower in the cement-augmented screw group than those in the conventional screw group (OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.22). However, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and Visual analog scale (VAS) score were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionCompared with conventional pedicle screw placement, cement-augmented pedicle screw is more effective in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar degenerative disease by improving fusion rate and interbody height, reducing the incidence of screw loosening, and elevating long-term efficacy.
| S-EPMC10464480 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposePlacement of zygomatic implants in the most optimal prosthetic position is considered challenging due to limited bone mass of the zygoma, limited visibility, length of the drilling path and proximity to critical anatomical structures. Augmented reality (AR) navigation can eliminate some of the disadvantages of surgical guides and conventional surgical navigation, while potentially improving accuracy. In this human cadaver study, we evaluated a developed AR navigation approach for placement of zygomatic implants after total maxillectomy.MethodsThe developed AR navigation interface connects a commercial navigation system with the Microsoft HoloLens. AR navigated surgery was performed to place 20 zygomatic implants using five human cadaver skulls after total maxillectomy. To determine accuracy, postoperative scans were virtually matched with preoperative three-dimensional virtual surgical planning, and distances in mm from entry-exit points and angular deviations were calculated as outcome measures. Results were compared with a previously conducted study in which zygomatic implants were positioned with 3D printed surgical guides.ResultsThe mean entry point deviation was 2.43 ± 1.33 mm and a 3D angle deviation of 5.80 ± 4.12° (range 1.39-19.16°). The mean exit point deviation was 3.28 mm (±2.17). The abutment height deviation was on average 2.20 ± 1.35 mm. The accuracy of the abutment in the occlusal plane was 4.13 ± 2.53 mm. Surgical guides perform significantly better for the entry-point (P = 0.012) and 3D angle (P = 0.05); however, there is no significant difference in accuracy for the exit-point (P = 0.143) when using 3D printed drill guides or AR navigated surgery.ConclusionDespite the higher precision of surgical guides, AR navigation demonstrated acceptable accuracy, with potential for improvement and specialized applications. The study highlights the feasibility of AR navigation for zygomatic implant placement, offering an alternative to conventional methods.
| S-EPMC11636531 | biostudies-literature