A systematic review and meta-analysis of fusion rate enhancements and bone graft options for spine surgery.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Our study aimed to evaluate differences in outcomes of patients submitted to spinal fusion using different grafts measuring the effectiveness of spinal fusion rates, pseudarthrosis rates, and adverse events. Applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, this systematic review and meta-analysis identified 64 eligible articles. The main inclusion criteria were adult patients that were submitted to spinal fusion, autologous iliac crest (AIC), allograft (ALG), alloplastic (ALP; hydroxyapatite, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7, or the association between them), and local bone (LB), whether in addition to metallic implants or not, was applied. We made a comparison among those groups to evaluate the presence of differences in outcomes, such as fusion rate, hospital st
SUBMITTER: Tavares WM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9085837 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA