Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a symptomatic giant colonic lipoma: technical tips for resection and specimen retrieval.

ABSTRACT: Video 1Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a giant colonic lipoma.

SUBMITTER: Pattarajierapan S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9108185 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a symptomatic giant colonic lipoma: technical tips for resection and specimen retrieval.

Pattarajierapan Sukit S Khomvilai Supakij S

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20220302 5

Video 1Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a giant colonic lipoma. ...[more]

PMID: 35585899

Similar Datasets

Successful removal of a giant esophageal lipoma with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description:Video 1Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a giant esophageal lipoma.

| S-EPMC8431273 | biostudies-literature

En bloc resection of a large symptomatic duodenal lipoma by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5991501 | biostudies-literature

Minimally invasive management of large duodenal lipoma: endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of large duodenal lipomas (DLs) of ≥2 cm between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR).MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent endoscopic resection of large DLs from June 2017 to March 2021 at our hospital. Clinicopathologic features, clinical outcomes, and follow-up endoscopy findings were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsTwenty-three patients (12 men) with a mean age of 57.4 years were included. The median tumor size was 28.4 ± 13.3 mm. ESD was performed in 19 patients, and EFTR was performed in 4. Complete resection was achieved in 21 patients. The operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ESD than EFTR group. Four patients in the EFTR group developed a fever; no other adverse events occurred. No patients required surgical intervention. During the average follow-up of 21.1 months, no residual tumor, recurrence, or metastasis was observed.ConclusionBoth ESD and EFTR provide minimally invasive, localized treatment of selected DLs. ESD might have some advantages in resecting large DLs in terms of procedure time and hospitalization.

| S-EPMC8721732 | biostudies-literature

Successful endoscopic submucosal dissection for a huge lipoma in the terminal ileum.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7650044 | biostudies-literature

Pulley traction-assisted colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection affords good visibility of submucosal layer.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6206323 | biostudies-literature

Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colonic tumor.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5990668 | biostudies-literature

Traction wire endoscopic submucosal dissection: tips and techniques from 4 institutions.

Project description:Video 1Video presentation of traction wire endoscopic submucosal dissection: tips and techniques from 4 institutions.

| S-EPMC8755644 | biostudies-literature

Loop-and-let-go technique for the management of symptomatic large colonic lipoma.

Project description:Video 1We depict (1) identification of a large lipoma in the sigmoid colon; (2) radial echo endoscopy confirming diagnosis; (3) removal with the loop-and-let-go technique; (4) ex vivo demonstration of the technique; and (5) an interval follow-up demonstrating healing of the lesion.

| S-EPMC10422078 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for proximal colonic lesions: An effective therapeutic option.

Project description:Background and study aimsDue to the greater risks of adverse events (AEs) and the lower rate of submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC), large proximal colonic polyps are frequently treated by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the West. However, this implies the risk of surgery to radicalize non-curative endoscopic resection in case of early colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated procedure outcomes in patients undergoing ESD for proximal colonic lesions at risk of SMIC.Patients and methodsAll consecutive patients with lesions at risk of SMIC proximal to splenic flexure referred for ESD at a tertiary center were prospectively included from 2019 to 2021. En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were primary outcomes, while length of hospitalization, AEs, need for surgery due to AEs, and recurrence rates were secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 116 patients (mean age: 68.4±10.91 years; men: 69.8%) were included. En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 84.5%, 78.4%, and 72.4%, respectively. T1 adenocarcinoma was reported in 25% of lesions (29/116). Eleven patients (9.5%) underwent secondary surgery due to non-curative resections; residual disease was found in one patient. Most frequent AE was intra-procedural perforation (9.9%); no AE required surgery. Median follow-up was 36 months; three of 97 recurrences (3.1%) at 6 months and one of 85 recurrence (1.2%) at 36 months were reported, which were all endoscopically treated.ConclusionsIn expert hands, ESD is effective and safe for proximal colonic lesions at risk of SMIC for the favorable balance between risk of AEs and benefit of avoiding unnecessary surgery, even for early CRC.

| S-EPMC11922310 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection pocket technique for removal of recurrent colonic lesion.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5965710 | biostudies-literature