Dataset Information

Anti-CSF-1R emactuzumab in combination with anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab in advanced solid tumor patients naive or experienced for immune checkpoint blockade.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This phase 1b study (NCT02323191) evaluated the safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) emactuzumab in combination with the programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1)-blocking mAb atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs).

Methods

Emactuzumab (500-1350 mg flat) and atezolizumab (1200 mg flat) were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of emactuzumab was conducted using the 3+3 design up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose (OBD). Extension cohorts to evaluate pharmacodynamics and clinical activity were conducted in metastatic ICB-naive urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) and ICB-pretreated melanoma (MEL), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and UBC patients.

Results

Overall, 221 patients were treated. No MTD was reached and the OBD was determined at 1000 mg of emactuzumab in combination with 1200 mg of atezolizumab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 (11.3%) patients of which fatigue and rash were the most common (14 patients (6.3%) each). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 9.8% for ICB-naïve UBC, 12.5% for ICB-experienced NSCLC, 8.3% for ICB-experienced UBC and 5.6% for ICB-experienced MEL patients, respectively. Tumor biopsy analyses demonstrated increased activated CD8 +tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) associated with clinical benefit in ICB-naïve UBC patients and less tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) reduction in ICB-experienced compared with ICB-naïve patients.

Conclusion

Emactuzumab in combination with atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile with increased fatigue and skin rash over usual atezolizumab monotherapy. A considerable ORR was particularly seen in ICB-experienced NSCLC patients. Increase ofCD8 +TILs under therapy appeared to be associated with persistence of a TAM subpopulation.

SUBMITTER: Gomez-Roca C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9114963 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Anti-CSF-1R emactuzumab in combination with anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab in advanced solid tumor patients naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockade.

Gomez-Roca Carlos C Cassier Philippe P Zamarin Dmitriy D Machiels Jean-Pascal JP Perez Gracia Jose Luis JL Stephen Hodi F F Taus Alvaro A Martinez Garcia Maria M Boni Valentina V Eder Joseph P JP Hafez Navid N Sullivan Ryan R Mcdermott David D Champiat Stephane S Aspeslagh Sandrine S Terret Catherine C Jegg Anna-Maria AM Jacob Wolfgang W Cannarile Michael A MA Ries Carola C Korski Konstanty K Michielin Francesca F Christen Randolph R Babitzki Galina G Watson Carl C Meneses-Lorente Georgina G Weisser Martin M Rüttinger Dominik D Delord Jean-Pierre JP Marabelle Aurelien A

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 20220501 5

<h4>Background</h4>This phase 1b study (NCT02323191) evaluated the safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) emactuzumab in combination with the programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1)-blocking mAb atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs).<h4>Methods</h4>Emactuzumab (500-1350 mg flat) and atezolizumab (1200 mg flat) were administ ...[more]

PMID: 35577503

Similar Datasets

Project description:Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy targeting PD-L1 via monoclonal antibody (mAb) has shown extensive clinical benefits in the diverse types of advanced malignancies. However, most patients are completely refractory to ICB therapy owing to the PD-L1 recycling mechanism. Herein, we propose photo-induced crosslinked and anti-PD-L1 peptide incorporated liposomes (immune checkpoint blockade liposomes; ICB-LPs) to promote PD-L1 multivalent binding for inducing lysosomal degradation of PD-L1 in tumor cells. The ICB-LPs are prepared by formulation of DC8,9PC with photo-polymerized diacetylenic moiety, 1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and anti-PD-L1 peptide (D-form NYSKPTDRQYHF)-conjugated DSPE-PEG2k (anti-PD-L1-DSPE-PEG2k) in a molar ratio of 45:45:10, followed by cross-linking of liposomal bilayer upon UV irradiation. The 10 mol% anti-PD-L1-DSPE-PEG2k incorporated ICB-LPs have a nano-sized lipid bilayer structure with an average diameter of 137.7 ± 1.04 nm, showing a high stability in serum condition. Importantly, the ICB-LPs efficiently promote the multivalent binding with PD-L1 on the tumor cell membrane, which are endocytosed with aim to deliver PD-L1 to the lysosomes, wherein the durable PD-L1 degradation is observed for 72 h, in contrast to anti PD-L1 mAbs showing the rapid PD-L1 recycling within 9 h. The in vitro co-culture experiments with CD8+ T cells show that ICB-LPs effectively enhance the T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses against tumor cells by blocking the PD-L1/PD-1 axis. When ICB-LPs are intravenously injected into colon tumor-bearing mice, they efficiently accumulate within the targeted tumor tissues via both passive and active tumor targeting, inducing a potent T cell-mediated antitumor immune response by effective and durable PD-L1 degradation. Collectively, this study demonstrates the superior antitumor efficacy of crosslinked and anti-PD-L1 peptide incorporated liposome formulation that promotes PD-L1 multivalent binding for trafficking of PD-L1 toward the lysosomes instead of the recycling endosomes.

Project description:PurposeBlocking the interaction between the programmed cell death (PD)-1 protein and one of its ligands, PD-L1, has been reported to have impressive antitumor responses. Therapeutics targeting this pathway are currently in clinical trials. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are the first of this anti-PD-1 pathway family of checkpoint inhibitors to gain accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. Nivolumab has been associated with improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated wild-type serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf proto-oncogene BRAF melanoma. Although the most mature data are in the treatment of melanoma, the FDA has granted approval of nivolumab for squamous cell lung cancer and the breakthrough therapy designation to immune- checkpoint inhibitors for use in other cancers: nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, for Hodgkin lymphoma, and MPDL-3280A, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, for bladder cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Here we review the literature on PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade and focus on the reported clinical studies that have included patients with melanoma.MethodsPubMed was searched to identify relevant clinical studies of PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapies in melanoma. A review of data from the current trials on clinicaltrial.gov was incorporated, as well as data presented in abstracts at the 2014 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, given the limited number of published clinical trials on this topic.FindingsThe anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents have been reported to have impressive antitumor effects in several malignancies, including melanoma. The greatest clinical activity in unselected patients has been seen in melanoma. Tumor expression of PD-L1 is a suggestive, but inadequate, biomarker predictive of response to immune-checkpoint blockade. However, tumors expressing little or no PD-L1 are less likely to respond to PD-1 pathway blockade. Combination checkpoint blockade with PD-1 plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 blockade appears to improve response rates in patients who are less likely to respond to single-checkpoint blockade. Toxicity with PD-1 blocking agents is less than the toxicity with previous immunotherapies (eg, interleukin 2, CTLA-4 blockade). Certain adverse events can be severe and potentially life threatening, but most can be prevented or reversed with close monitoring and appropriate management.ImplicationsThis family of immune-checkpoint inhibitors benefits not only patients with metastatic melanoma but also those with historically less responsive tumor types. Although a subset of patients responds to single-agent blockade, the initial trial of checkpoint-inhibitor combinations has reported a potential to improve response rates. Combination therapies appear to be a means of increasing response rates, albeit with increased immune-related adverse events. As these treatments become available to patients, education regarding the recognition and management of immune-related effects of immune-checkpoint blockade will be essential for maximizing clinical benefit.