Dataset Information

The Off-Table Technique Increases Operating Room Efficiency in Direct Anterior Hip Replacement.

ABSTRACT:

Background

When performing a total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA), many orthopedic surgeons utilize an orthopedic traction table. This technique requires an expensive table, time for positioning, staff to operate the table, and time-consuming transitions when preparing the femur. Some surgeons advocate for an "off-table" technique to avoid these difficulties. In this paper, we compare operating room efficiency between on-table and off-table techniques.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon across the transition from on-table to off-table DAA technique. Three cohorts were defined; the last 40 on-table hips, the first 40 off-table hips, followed by the second 40 hips. Timestamps from the operative record were recorded to calculate setup, surgical, takedown, and total room time. Implant fixation, patient demographic data, comorbidities, and complications were recorded.

Results

From cohort 1 to 2, there was a 7-minute (14.44%, P = .0002) improvement in setup time but no change in total room time. From cohort 2 to 3, there was an additional 7-minute (15.47%, P < .0001) improvement in setup time, 32-minute (25.88%, P < .0001) improvement in surgical time, and 40-minute (21.96%, P < .0001) improvement in total room time yielding cumulative changes from cohort 1 to 3 of 15 minutes (27.68%, P < .0001), 28 minutes (23.11%, P < .0001), and 43 minutes (23.37%, P < .0001), respectively. There was no correlation between height, weight, or body mass index and time at any interval.

Conclusion

Conversion to an off-table DAA technique offers an improvement in operating room efficiency. This is seen in setup, operative, and total room time. Implementation could allow for an additional case each day.

SUBMITTER: Owen TM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9121069 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Off-Table Technique Increases Operating Room Efficiency in Direct Anterior Hip Replacement.

Owen Trevor M TM Horberg John V JV Corten Kristoff K Moskal Joseph T JT

Arthroplasty today 20220518

<h4>Background</h4>When performing a total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA), many orthopedic surgeons utilize an orthopedic traction table. This technique requires an expensive table, time for positioning, staff to operate the table, and time-consuming transitions when preparing the femur. Some surgeons advocate for an "off-table" technique to avoid these difficulties. In this paper, we compare operating room efficiency between on-table and off-table techniques.<h4>Materia ...[more]

PMID: 35601995

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExtremity surgeons frequently operate on the preoperative stretcher rather than the operating room (OR) table. This study sought to identify differences between stretcher-based (SB) and OR table-based (TB) procedures with regard to time efficiency and OR team member preferences.MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of SB vs OR TB foot and ankle procedures. Fifty-two patients undergoing a hardware removal, isolated gastrocnemius recession, soft tissue procedure, or foreign body removal at our day surgery unit were included. Start time and exit time were recorded. "Start time" was the number of minutes between the patient entering the OR and first incision. "Exit time" was the number of minutes between the procedure ending and the patient exiting the OR. Surveys were disseminated to OR staff who participated in the included cases.ResultsThe total measured time in the OR was an average 6 minutes shorter in the Stretcher group compared to the OR Table group (10 minutes vs 16 minutes, P < .001). SB procedures were associated with a significantly shorter start time (median difference = 4 minutes, P = .001), but not exit time (median difference = 1 minute, P = .058). No difference was found in actual surgical time. Thirty (96.8%) OR team members perceived SB procedures as enhancing OR efficiency, and 30 (96.8%) respondents considered SB procedures to be equal or superior to OR TB procedures in terms of patient safety. All would recommend or strongly recommend SB procedures.ConclusionWe found SB foot and ankle procedures to require less room time than OR TB procedures. Particularly for high-volume specialties, an average 6 minutes saved per case may meaningfully improve overall OR efficiency. Most OR team members believed that SB surgery improves OR efficiency and is the safer option for OR team members.Level of evidenceLevel II, randomized controlled trial, survey.

Project description:BackgroundIt remains unclear whether the use of an orthopaedic traction table (TT) in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) results in better outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to compare the THA outcomes through DAA on a standard operating table and the THA outcomes through DAA on a TT.MethodsPubMed, Epistemonikos, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 01 January 2024. An indirect comparison in network meta-analysis was performed to assess treatment effects between DAA on a TT and DAA on a standard table, using fixed-effects and random-effects models estimated with frequentist approach and consistency assumption. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for continuous variables and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated for binary variables.ResultsThe systematic review of the literature identified 43 RCTs with a total of 2,258 patients. DAA with TT had a 102.3 mL higher intraoperative blood loss and a 0.6 mmol/L lower Hb 3 days postoperatively compared with DAA without TT (SMD = 102.33, 95% CI 47.62 to 157.04; SMD = - 0.60, 95% CI - 1.19 to - 0.00). DAA with TT had a 0.15 lower periprosthetic fracture OR compared with DAA without TT (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.86). There were no further significant differences in surgical, radiological, functional outcomes and in complication rates.ConclusionBased on our findings and taking into account the limitations, we recommend that particular attention be paid to the risk of periprosthetic fracture in DAA on a standard operating table and blood loss in DAA with TT. Since numerous other surgical, radiological, functional outcome parameters and other complication rates studied showed no significant difference between DAA on a standard operating table and DAA with TT, no recommendation for a change in surgical technique seems justified.Level of evidenceLevel I evidence, because this is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Dataset Information

The Off-Table Technique Increases Operating Room Efficiency in Direct Anterior Hip Replacement.

Background

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Off-Table Technique Increases Operating Room Efficiency in Direct Anterior Hip Replacement.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets