Dataset Information

The Impact of Care Partners on the Mobility of Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale & objective

Many older adults receiving hemodialysis have mobility limitations and rely on care partners, yet data are sparse regarding the support provided by care partners. Our aim was to examine how care partners support the mobility of an older adult receiving hemodialysis.

Study design

Qualitative study.

Setting & participants

Using purposive sampling, we recruited persons aged 60 years or more receiving maintenance hemodialysis and care partners aged 18 years or more who were providing support to an older adult receiving hemodialysis. We conducted in-person semi-structured interviews about mobility with each individual.

Analytical approach

We conducted descriptive and focused coding of interview transcripts and employed thematic analysis. Our outcome was to describe perceived mobility supports provided by care partners using qualitative themes.

Results

We enrolled 31 older adults receiving hemodialysis (42% women, 68% Black) with a mean age of 73 ± 8 years and a mean dialysis duration of 4.6 ± 3.5 years. Of these, 87% of patients used assistive devices and 90% had care partners. We enrolled 12 care partners (75% women, 33% Black) with a mean age of 54 ± 16 years. From our patient and care partner interviews, we found three themes: (1) what care partners see, (2) what care partners do, and (3) what care partners feel. Regarding what they see, care partners witness a decline in patient mobility. Regarding what they do, care partners guide and facilitate activities and manage others who also assist. Regarding what they feel, care partners respect the patient's autonomy but experience frustration and worry about the patient's future mobility.

Limitations

Modest sample size; single geographic area.

Conclusions

In older adults receiving hemodialysis, care partners observe a decline in mobility and provide support for mobility. They respect the patient's autonomy but worry about future mobility losses. Future research should incorporate care partners in interventions that address mobility in older adults receiving hemodialysis.

SUBMITTER: Liu CK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9157255 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Impact of Care Partners on the Mobility of Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis.

Liu Christine K CK Seo Janet J Lee Dayeun D Wright Kristen K Tamura Manjula Kurella MK Moye Jennifer J Weiner Daniel E DE Bean Jonathan F JF

Kidney medicine 20220429 6

<h4>Rationale & objective</h4>Many older adults receiving hemodialysis have mobility limitations and rely on care partners, yet data are sparse regarding the support provided by care partners. Our aim was to examine how care partners support the mobility of an older adult receiving hemodialysis.<h4>Study design</h4>Qualitative study.<h4>Setting & participants</h4>Using purposive sampling, we recruited persons aged 60 years or more receiving maintenance hemodialysis and care partners aged 18 year ...[more]

PMID: 35663231

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveFor older adults, maintaining mobility is a major priority, especially for those with advanced chronic diseases like kidney failure. However, our understanding of the factors affecting mobility in older adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis is limited.Study designDescriptive qualitative study.Setting & participantsUsing purposive sampling, we recruited (1) persons aged≥60 years receiving maintenance hemodialysis; and (2) care partners (≥18 years) providing regular support to an older adult receiving hemodialysis. During a single in-person home visit, we assessed mobility using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and conducted individual one-on-one interviews regarding important personal factors related to mobility.Analytical approachDescriptive statistics were used for demographic and SPPB data. Transcripts underwent thematic coding, informed by the International Classification of Function framework of mobility. We used conceptual content analysis to inductively extract themes and subthemes.ResultsWe enrolled 31 older adults receiving hemodialysis (42% female, 68% Black) with a mean age of 73±8 years and mean dialysis vintage of 4.6±3.5 years; their mean SPPB score was 3.6±2.8 points. Among 12 care partners (75% female, 33% Black), the mean age was 54±16 years and mean SPPB score was 10.1±2.4 points. Major themes extracted were (1) mobility represents independence; (2) mobility is precarious; (3) limitations in mobility cause distress; (4) sources of encouragement and motivation are critical; and (5) adaptability is key.LimitationsModest sample from single geographic area.ConclusionsFor older adults receiving hemodialysis, mobility is severely limited and is often precarious in nature, causing distress. Older adults receiving hemodialysis and their care partners have identified sources of encouragement and motivation for mobility, and cite an adaptable mindset as important. Future studies should conceptualize mobility as a variable condition and build on this outlook of adaptability in the development of interventions.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveTimely recognition of functional decline in older adults receiving dialysis will allow clinicians to pursue interventions to prevent further disability and/or lead patient-centered goals of care discussions. Annual change in the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical component score (PCS) could identify patients with functional decline. Our objectives were to assess SF-12 PCS change over a year, risk factors associated with SF-12 PCS change, and the association of SF-12 PCS change with mortality in a survivor cohort of older adults receiving dialysis.Study designRetrospective study.Setting & participants1,371 adults 65 years or older receiving hemodialysis for 6 or more months who completed SF-12 PCSs 300 or more days apart from 2012 to 2013.ExposuresSerum albumin level; hemodialysis access type; SF-12 PCS change (for mortality analyses).OutcomesSF-12 PCS change and mortality.Analytical approachMultivariable-adjusted linear regression model; Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsWe excluded 24% (n = 801) of our cohort for death before the second SF-12 PCS. Among the 1,371 with sufficient SF-12 PCS data, mean age was 79.9 ± 4.5 years. Average SF-12 PCS change in 1 year was minimal (-0.9 ± 9.6), but 39.3% (n = 539) and 32.2% (n = 442) had clinically relevant SF-12 PCS decline and improvement, respectively. Albumin level and access type were not statistically associated with SF-12 PCS change. SF-12 PCS change was not associated with mortality (adjusted HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00).Limitations2 time points to assess SF-12 PCS change; covariate assessment only at baseline; survivor bias.ConclusionsIn this cohort of older adults receiving hemodialysis, nearly one-fourth died, while among survivors, it was more common for SF-12 PCS to decline than improve in a year. Annual SF-12 PCS change was not associated with traditional risk factors for functional impairment or mortality risk. Additional research is needed to identify appropriate measures and frequency of assessment for functional decline.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveAttention to geriatric impairments is not routinely provided to older adults receiving dialysis. Our objective was to identify patient and personnel perspectives on experiences with geriatric problems, unmet needs that may affect a patient's ability to maintain his or her functional status, and preferences for design of a geriatric model of care tailored to address the unmet needs.Study designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus groups.Setting & participants14 hemodialysis patients 55 years and older and 24 dialysis unit personnel (eg, nephrologists, nurses, patient care technicians, and social workers) representing 5 dialysis units.Analytical approachContent analysis to identify themes reflecting unmet needs and design considerations for a geriatric model of care for older adults receiving dialysis.Results4 themes (or unmet needs) identified from both patient and personnel transcripts were: (1) mobility, which referred to the insufficient mobility assessment and transportation services; (2) medications, which referred to insufficient attention to appropriate prescribing and medication self-management; (3) social support, which referred to insufficient support for activities of daily living and emotional problems; and (4) communication, which referred to insufficient patient-provider and interprofessional communication, including data transfer across separate health systems. Although participants generally acknowledged that an integrated model of care could result in benefits across all 4 areas of unmet need, they noted that the program design would need to minimize disruption of current workflow and practices in dialysis units.LimitationsThe findings may not be broadly representative of all older adults receiving dialysis and dialysis unit personnel.ConclusionsThere is insufficient attention to mobility, medication management, social support, and communication needs for older adults receiving in-center hemodialysis. Addressing these unmet needs in a geriatric model of care and measuring its effectiveness are areas of future research.

Project description:BackgroundIt is unclear whether surgical placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula (AVF) confers substantial clinical benefits over an AV graft (AVG) in older adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We report vascular access outcomes of a pilot clinical trial.Study designPilot randomized parallel-group open-label trial.Setting & participantsPatients 65 years and older with ESKD and no prior AV access receiving maintenance hemodialysis through a tunneled central venous catheter referred for AV access placement by their treating nephrologist.InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to surgical placement of an AVG or AVF.OutcomesIndex AV access primary failure, successful cannulation, adjuvant interventions and infections.ResultsOf 122 older adults receiving hemodialysis and no prior AV access surgery, 24% died before (n = 18) or were too sick for (n = 11) referral for a permanent AV access. Of 46 eligible patients, 36 (78%) consented and were randomly assigned to AVG (n = 18) and AVF (n = 18) placement, of whom 13 (72%) and 16 (89%) underwent index AV access surgical placement, respectively. At a median follow-up of 321.0 days, primary AV access failure was noted in 31% in each group. The proportion of patients with successful cannulation was 62% (8 of 13) in the AVG and 50% (8 of 16) in the AVF group; median times to successful cannulation were 75.0 and 113.5 days, respectively. Endovascular procedures were recorded in 38% and 44%, and surgical reinterventions, in 23% and 25%, respectively. AV access infection was seen in 3 (23%) and 2 (13%) patients, respectively.LimitationsSmall sample size precludes statistical inference.ConclusionsAlmost one-quarter of older adults with incident ESKD and a central venous catheter as primary access were not referred for AV access placement due to medical reasons. Based on these limited results, there is little reason to favor either an AVF or AVG in this population until results from a larger randomized clinical trial become available.FundingGovernment funding to an author (Dr Murea is supported by National Institutes of Health∖National Institute on Aging grant 1R03 AG060178-01).Trial registrationNCT03545113.

Dataset Information

The Impact of Care Partners on the Mobility of Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis.

Rationale & objective

Study design

Setting & participants

Analytical approach

Results

Limitations

Conclusions

Publications

The Impact of Care Partners on the Mobility of Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets