A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Academic publishing is undergoing a highly transformative process, and many established rules and value systems that are in place, such as traditional peer review (TPR) and preprints, are facing unprecedented challenges, including as a result of post-publication peer review. The integrity and validity of the academic literature continue to rely naively on blind trust, while TPR and preprints continue to fail to effectively screen out errors, fraud, and misconduct. Imperfect TPR invariably results in imperfect papers that have passed through varying levels of rigor of screening and validation. If errors or misconduct were not detected during TPR's editorial screening, but are detected at the post-publication stage, an opportunity is created to correct the academic record. Currently, the mos
SUBMITTER: Teixeira da Silva JA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9159037 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA