Dataset Information

Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The initial phases of robotic surgical skills acquisition are associated with poor technical performance, such as low knot-tensile strength (KTS). Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) can improve force and accuracy in motor tasks but research in surgery is limited to open and laparoscopic tasks in students. More recently, robotic surgery has gained traction and is now the most common approach for certain procedures (e.g. prostatectomy). Early-phase robotic suturing performance is dependent on prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation, and this study aimed to determine whether performance can be improved with prefrontal tDCS.

Methods

Fifteen surgical residents were randomized to either active then sham tDCS or sham then active tDCS, in two counterbalanced sessions in a double-blind crossover study. Within each session, participants performed a robotic suturing task repeated in three blocks: pre-, intra- and post-tDCS. During the intra-tDCS block, participants were randomized to either active tDCS (2 mA for 15 min) to the PFC or sham tDCS. Primary outcome measures of technical quality included KTS and error scores.

Results

Significantly faster completion times were observed longitudinally, regardless of active (p < 0.001) or sham stimulation (p < 0.001). KTS was greater following active compared to sham stimulation (median: active = 44.35 N vs. sham = 27.12 N, p < 0.001). A significant reduction in error scores from "pre-" to "post-" (p = 0.029) were only observed in the active group.

Conclusion

tDCS could reduce error and enhance KTS during robotic suturing and warrants further exploration as an adjunct to robotic surgical training.

SUBMITTER: Patel R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9160107 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing.

Patel Ronak R Suwa Yusuke Y Kinross James J von Roon Alexander A Woods Adam J AJ Darzi Ara A Singh Harsimrat H Leff Daniel Richard DR

Surgical endoscopy 20211101 7

<h4>Background</h4>The initial phases of robotic surgical skills acquisition are associated with poor technical performance, such as low knot-tensile strength (KTS). Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) can improve force and accuracy in motor tasks but research in surgery is limited to open and laparoscopic tasks in students. More recently, robotic surgery has gained traction and is now the most common approach for certain procedures (e.g. prostatectomy). Early-phase robotic suturing p ...[more]

PMID: 34724587

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveSurgical skill assessment tools such as the End-to-End Assessment of Suturing Expertise (EASE) can differentiate a surgeon's experience level. In this simulation-based study, we define a competency benchmark for intraoperative robotic suturing using EASE as a validated measure of performance.DesignParticipants conducted a dry-lab vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) exercise. Videos were each independently scored by 2 trained, blinded reviewers using EASE. Inter-rater reliability was measured with prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK) using 2 example videos. All videos were reviewed by an expert surgeon, who determined if the suturing skills exhibited were at a competency level expected for residency graduation (pass or fail). The Contrasting Group (CG) method was then used to set a pass/fail score at the intercept of the pass and fail cohorts' EASE score distributions.SettingKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.ParticipantsTwenty-six participants: 8 medical students, 8 junior residents (PGY 1-2), 7 senior residents (PGY 3-5) and 3 attending urologists.ResultsAfter 1 round of consensus-building, average PABAK across EASE subskills was 0.90 (Range 0.67-1.0). The CG method produced a competency benchmark EASE score of >35/39, with a pass rate of 10/26 (38%); 27% were deemed competent by expert evaluation. False positives and negatives were defined as medical students who passed and attendings who failed the assessment, respectively. This pass/fail score produced no false positives or negatives, and fewer JR than SR were considered competent by both the expert and CG benchmark.ConclusionsUsing an absolute standard setting method, competency scores were set to identify trainees who could competently execute a standardized dry-lab robotic suturing exercise. This standard can be used for high stakes decisions regarding a trainee's technical readiness for independent practice. Future work includes validation of this standard in the clinical environment through correlation with clinical outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundManual objective assessment of skill and errors in minimally invasive surgery have been validated with correlation to surgical expertise and patient outcomes. However, assessment and error annotation can be subjective and are time-consuming processes, often precluding their use. Recent years have seen the development of artificial intelligence models to work towards automating the process to allow reduction of errors and truly objective assessment. This study aimed to validate surgical skill rating and error annotations in suturing gestures to inform the development and evaluation of AI models.MethodsSAR-RARP50 open data set was blindly, independently annotated at the gesture level in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) suturing. Manual objective assessment tools and error annotation methodology, Objective Clinical Human Reliability Analysis (OCHRA), were used as ground truth to train and test vision-based deep learning methods to estimate skill and errors. Analysis included descriptive statistics plus tool validity and reliability.ResultsFifty-four RARP videos (266 min) were analysed. Strong/excellent inter-rater reliability (range r = 0.70-0.89, p < 0.001) and very strong correlation (r = 0.92, p < 0.001) between objective assessment tools was demonstrated. Skill estimation of OSATS and M-GEARS had a Spearman's Correlation Coefficient 0.37 and 0.36, respectively, with normalised mean absolute error representing a prediction error of 17.92% (inverted "accuracy" 82.08%) and 20.6% (inverted "accuracy" 79.4%) respectively. The best performing models in error prediction achieved mean absolute precision of 37.14%, area under the curve 65.10% and Macro-F1 58.97%.ConclusionsThis is the first study to employ detailed error detection methodology and deep learning models within real robotic surgical video. This benchmark evaluation of AI models sets a foundation and promising approach for future advancements in automated technical skill assessment.

Project description:BackgroundRobotic suturing training is in increasing demand and can be done using suture-pads or robotic simulation training. Robotic simulation is less cumbersome, whereas a robotic suture-pad approach could be more effective but is more costly. A training curriculum with crossover between both approaches may be a practical solution. However, studies assessing the impact of starting with robotic simulation or suture-pads in robotic suturing training are lacking.MethodsThis was a randomized controlled crossover trial conducted with 20 robotic novices from 3 countries who underwent robotic suturing training using an Intuitive Surgical® X and Xi system with the SimNow (robotic simulation) and suture-pads (dry-lab). Participants were randomized to start with robotic simulation (intervention group, n = 10) or suture-pads (control group, n = 10). After the first and second training, all participants completed a robotic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) in biotissue. Primary endpoint was the objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) score during HJ, scored by two blinded raters. Secondary endpoints were force measurements and a qualitative analysis. After training, participants were surveyed regarding their preferences.ResultsOverall, 20 robotic novices completed both training sessions and performed 40 robotic HJs. After both trainings, OSATS was scored higher in the robotic simulation-first group (3.3 ± 0.9 vs 2.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.049), whereas the median maximum force (N) (5.0 [3.2-8.0] vs 3.8 [2.3-12.8]; p = 0.739) did not differ significantly between the groups. In the survey, 17/20 (85%) participants recommended to include robotic simulation training, 14/20 (70%) participants preferred to start with robotic simulation, and 20/20 (100%) to include suture-pad training.ConclusionSurgical performance during robotic HJ in robotic novices was significantly better after robotic simulation-first training followed by suture-pad training. A robotic suturing curriculum including both robotic simulation and dry-lab suturing should ideally start with robotic simulation.

Project description:BackgroundOver the last century, technological progress has been tremendous, and technological advancement is reflected in the development of medicine. This research assessed attitudes towards surgical robots and identified correlations with willingness to participate in robotic surgery based on factors influencing trust in automated systems.MethodUsing data from a survey, which included the Multi-dimensional Robot Attitude Scale (MdRAS) and a questionnaire consisting of attitude statements regarding the factors affecting trust in automated systems, the experiment assessed the attitudes of healthcare workers and potential patients towards surgery robots, and attempted to find a correlation between these attitudes, age, and gender.Results and conclusionStatistical evaluation of the responses (N = 197) showed that positive attitude towards surgical robots showed a high correlation with the willingness to participate in robotic surgery and gave the strongest correlations with the MdRAS utility and negative attitude towards robots subscales. For the assessment of willingness, the MdRAS subscales alone did not provide a strong enough correlation. All factors examined showed a significant correlation with participation. Having faith in the surgery robot, the propensity to trust technology, the designer's reputation, the ease of work that a surgical robot provides, positive experience with robots, and believing the surgeon is competent at operating the machine seemed to have been the most important positive correlations, while fear of errors gave the highest negative correlation. The healthcare workers and potential patients showed significant differences in the subscales of the questionnaire perceived risk and knowledge but no significant difference in the characteristics of the surgical robot. There was no difference in willingness to participate between the samples. Age did not show a significant correlation with the score achieved and willingness in any of the samples. Significant differences were found between male and female respondents, with men having more positive attitudes and being more likely to participate in surgeries using surgery robots than women. As a result, the research potentially sheds light on the factors that need to be considered when building trust in robotic surgery.

Dataset Information

Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets