Dataset Information

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure　- A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

ABSTRACT: Background: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and wide QRS (≥120 ms), data on the use of or long-term outcomes after CRT implantation in Japan are limited. Methods and Results: We examined proper CRT utilization and outcomes in 3,447 consecutive symptomatic CHF patients registered in the CHART-2 Study. We identified 167 potentially eligible patients and divided them into 4 groups according to the presence (+) or absence (-) of an indication for and implantation of CRT: Group A (reference group), (+)indication/(+)CRT; Group B, (+)indication/(-)CRT; Group C, (-)indication/(+)CRT; and Group D, (-)indication/(-)CRT. Based on the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines, 91 patients met the eligibility for CRT implantation, with 43 (47%) of them undergoing CRT implantation. After adjusting for confounders, age was significantly associated with no CRT use (odds ratio per 5-year increase 1.46; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.05; P=0.012). Among the 4 groups, the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death and CHF admission were highest in Group B and lowest in Group D (P=0.029). Conclusions: In this study, only half the eligible CHF patients properly received CRT. Aging was a significant risk factor for no CRT use. Patients without CRT despite having an indication could be at higher risk of mortality and CHF admission.

SUBMITTER: Hayashi H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9168508 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure　- A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

Hayashi Hideka H Yasuda Satoshi S Nakano Makoto M Sakata Yasuhiko Y Nochioka Kotaro K Shiroto Takashi T Hasebe Yuhi Y Noda Takashi T Miyata Satoshi S Shimokawa Hiroaki H

Circulation reports 20220525 6

Background: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and wide QRS (≥120 ms), data on the use of or long-term outcomes after CRT implantation in Japan are limited. Methods and Results: We examined proper CRT utilization and outcomes in 3,447 consecutive symptomatic CHF patients registered in the CHART-2 Study. We identified 167 potentially eligible patient ...[more]

PMID: 35774073

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Patients with recurring heart failure (HF) following cardiac resynchronization therapy fare poorly. Their management is undecided. We tested remote hemodynamic-guided pharmacotherapy. Methods and Results We evaluated cardiac resynchronization therapy subjects included in the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, which randomized patients with persistent New York Heart Association Class III symptoms and ≥1 HF hospitalization in the previous 12 months to remotely managed pulmonary artery (PA) pressure-guided management (treatment) or usual HF care (control). Diuretics and/or vasodilators were adjusted conventionally in control and included remote PA pressure information in treatment. Annualized HF hospitalization rates, changes in PA pressures over time (analyzed by area under the curve), changes in medications, and quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores) were assessed. Patients who had cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=190, median implant duration 755 days) at enrollment had poor hemodynamic function (cardiac index 2.00±0.59 L/min per m2), high comorbidity burden (67% had secondary pulmonary hypertension, 61% had estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2), and poor Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (57±24). During 18 months randomized follow-up, HF hospitalizations were 30% lower in treatment (n=91, 62 events, 0.46 events/patient-year) versus control patients (n=99, 93 events, 0.68 events/patient-year) (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; P=0.028). Treatment patients had more medication up-/down-titrations (847 versus 346 in control, P<0.001), mean PA pressure reduction (area under the curve -413.2±123.5 versus 60.1±88.0 in control, P=0.002), and quality of life improvement (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire decreased -13.5±23 versus -4.9±24.8 in control, P=0.006). Conclusions Remote hemodynamic-guided adjustment of medical therapies decreased PA pressures and the burden of HF symptoms and hospitalizations in patients with recurring Class III HF and hospitalizations, beyond the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00531661.

Project description:BackgroundLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is emerging as an effective alternative to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and improve heart function. The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of LBBP in heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and left bundle branch block (LBBB).MethodsAll patients with complete LBBB and LVEF <50% were retrospectively included in the study from April 2018 to April 2021 and underwent CRT via LBBP implantation. ECG, pacing parameters, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, echocardiographic measurements, and complications were recorded and analyzed at implant and during follow-up of 1, 6, and 12 months.ResultsLeft bundle branch pacing was successful in all 34 patients (mean age 65.6 ± 11.2 years, 67.6% men). A significant decrease in QRS duration (QRSd) was observed after the LBBP operation for 1 month (153.2 ± 1.7 vs. 111.9 ± 2.6 ms, p < 0.01). LBB capture threshold and R-wave amplitude remained stable at 12-month follow-up when compared with implantation values (0.62 ± 0.13 V @ 0.4 ms vs. 0.73 ± 0.21 V @ 0.4 ms, 12.02 ± 5.68 mV vs. 8.58 ± 4.09 mV, respectively). LVEF increased significantly (35.28 ± 1.70% vs. 51.09 ± 1.71%, p < 0.01) accompanied with reduced left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd; 65.3 ± 1.99 vs. 53.58 ± 2.07 mm, p < 0.01) and left atrial dimension (LAD; 49.03 ± 1.32 vs. 40.67 ± 1.58 mm, p < 0.01). Normalized LVEF (LVEF ≥ 50%) was found in 70.5% of patients at 12 months. The NYHA classification, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were significantly improved at follow-up of 12 months (all p < 0.01 vs. baseline). No deaths or heart failure hospitalizations were observed during the follow-up period.ConclusionThe current work suggested that LBBP was feasible with a high success implantation rate and effective to correct LBBB and improved left ventricular structure and function with a low and stable pacing threshold.

Dataset Information

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure　- A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

Publications

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure　- A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure - A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

Publications

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure - A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure　- A Report From the CHART-2 Study.

Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure　- A Report From the CHART-2 Study.