Dataset Information

Symptom burden and lived experiences of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals on the management of malignant bowel obstruction: A qualitative systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Malignant bowel obstruction occurs in up to 50% of people with advanced ovarian and 15% of people with gastrointestinal cancers. Evaluation and comparison of interventions to manage symptoms are hampered by inconsistent evaluations of efficacy and lack of agreed core outcomes. The patient perspective is rarely incorporated.

Aim

To synthesise the qualitative data regarding patient, caregiver and healthcare professionals' views and experience of malignant bowel obstruction to inform the development of a core outcome set for the evaluation of malignant bowel obstruction.

Design

A qualitative systematic review was conducted, with narrative synthesis. The review protocol was registered prospectively (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, CRD42020176393).

Data sources

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and 2021. Reference lists were screened for further relevant publications, and citation tracking was performed.

Results

Nine papers were included, reporting on seven studies which described the views and experiences of malignant bowel obstruction through the perspectives of 75 patients, 13 caregivers and 62 healthcare professionals. Themes across the papers included symptom burden, diverse experiences of interventions, impact on patient quality of life, implications and trajectory of malignant bowel obstruction, mixed experience of communication and the importance of realistic goals of care.

Conclusion

Some of the most devastating sequelae of malignant bowel obstruction, such as pain and psychological distress, are not included routinely in its clinical or research evaluation. These data will contribute to a wider body of work to ensure the patient and caregiver perspective is recognised in the development of a core outcome set.

SUBMITTER: Baddeley E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9174615 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Symptom burden and lived experiences of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals on the management of malignant bowel obstruction: A qualitative systematic review.

Baddeley Elin E Mann Mala M Bravington Alison A Johnson Miriam J MJ Currow David D Murtagh Fliss E M FEM Boland Elaine G EG Obita George G Oliver Alfred A Seddon Kathy K Nelson Annmarie A Boland Jason W JW Noble Simon I R SIR

Palliative medicine 20220308 6

<h4>Background</h4>Malignant bowel obstruction occurs in up to 50% of people with advanced ovarian and 15% of people with gastrointestinal cancers. Evaluation and comparison of interventions to manage symptoms are hampered by inconsistent evaluations of efficacy and lack of agreed core outcomes. The patient perspective is rarely incorporated.<h4>Aim</h4>To synthesise the qualitative data regarding patient, caregiver and healthcare professionals' views and experience of malignant bowel obstructio ...[more]

PMID: 35260004

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceCare of patients with malignant bowel obstruction caused by peritoneal metastases may present an ethical dilemma for surgeons when nonoperative management fails.ObjectiveTo characterize outcomes of palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from peritoneal carcinomatosis to guide decision making about surgery and postoperative interventions for patients with terminal illness.Evidence reviewWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, and Google Scholar and performed manual searches of selected journals from inception to August 30, 2012, with no filters, limits, or language restrictions. We used database-specific combinations of the terms intestinal obstruction, malignant, surgery or surgical, and palliat*. We included studies reporting outcomes after palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from peritoneal carcinomatosis from any primary malignant neoplasm and excluded case studies, curative surgery, isolated percutaneous procedures, stenting for intraluminal lesions, and studies in which benign and malignant obstructions could not be distinguished. We assessed quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.FindingsWe screened 2347 unique articles, selected 108 articles for full-text review, and included 17 studies. Surgery was able to palliate obstructive symptoms for 32% to 100% of patients, enable resumption of a diet for 45% to 75% of patients, and facilitate discharge to home in 34% to 87% of patients. Mortality was high (6%-32%), and serious complications were common (7%-44%). Frequent reobstructions (6%-47%), readmissions (38%-74%), and reoperations (2%-15%) occurred. Survival was limited (median, 26-273 days), and hospitalization for surgery consumed a substantial portion of the patient's remaining life (11%-61%).Conclusions and relevanceAlthough palliative surgery can benefit patients, it comes at the cost of high mortality and substantial hospitalization relative to the patient's remaining survival time. Preoperatively, surgeons should present realistic goals and limitations of surgery. For patients choosing surgery, clarifying preferences for aggressive postoperative interventions preoperatively is critical given the high complication rate and limited survival after surgery for malignant bowel obstruction.

Project description:IntroductionProgressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative disorder initially characterised by disturbances in gait, balance and posture, with death occurring after several years of progressive physical and cognitive decline. This, along with a low index of suspicion, a high degree of diagnostic uncertainty and no approved treatment options, greatly impacts the lives of patients and caregivers. This research was conducted to (i) gain insight into the clinical and emotional journey of patients with PSP, (ii) assess experiences and perspectives, (iii) understand disease impact and (iv) identify key challenges and unmet needs.MethodsA literature search and qualitative interviews with six PSP experts were conducted to map the clinical pathway and identify breakpoints. The pathway was validated by key opinion leaders in seven countries. Qualitative research was conducted over 6 months in seven countries with PSP stakeholders (N = 112) to explore the emotional journey. The approach included self-ethnography, 60-min telephone interviews and the completion of 7-day smartphone diaries.ResultsThe current PSP clinical journey can take many different pathways, with patients cycling through the healthcare system before a correct referral is made and a possible/probable diagnosis received. Breakpoints contribute to delays in accessing appropriate clinical care, a high degree of diagnostic divergence and suboptimal management of the disease. The emotional journey is dominated by negative feelings, although some moments of positivity were noted. The research highlighted a lack of disease understanding amongst all stakeholders and a lack of support for patients/caregivers. The authors make a number of recommendations for care improvements, including longer consultation times, closer collaboration among healthcare professionals and patient organisations, and more varied support and information for patients/caregivers.ConclusionThis work represents a major collaborative effort to understand the lived experience of PSP. The research illustrates that a coordinated effort from all stakeholders is required to address ongoing needs and challenges within PSP.

Project description:BackgroundThe ageing population has increased the demand for healthcare services. In Norway, community-based long-term care are prioritised, leading to fewer nursing home places. As a result, nursing home residents are now older and have more complex needs. Nearly 92% of nursing home residents are affected by cognitive impairments accompanied by neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) that affect their daily activity, physical function, cognition, and behaviour. Traditionally, pharmacological therapy has been the prevailing treatment for NPS. However, emerging evidence suggests that physical activity can serve as an alternative treatment approach. Physical activity has the potential to maintain physical independence and enhance the quality of life (QoL) for the residents. Despite these benefits, institutionalisation in a nursing home often restricts activity levels of residents. This study explores facilitators and barriers to physical activity in nursing homes through the experiences of healthcare professionals and family caregivers. The goal is to enhance our understanding of how to promote and support physical activity for nursing home residents by identifying essential factors for successfully implementing daily physical activity initiatives.MethodsSeven focus groups were conducted with a total of 31 participants. Participants included healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, nurses, unit- and department managers, assistant occupational therapists, and assistant nurses) and family caregivers of residents at nursing homes. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, underpinned by hermeneutic phenomenology.ResultsThree main themes related to facilitators and barriers to physical activity in nursing homes were identified: inconsistency in task prioritisation; need for improved interprofessional collaboration; and need for improved utilisation of external resources. The participants experienced task prioritisation and lack of interdisciplinary collaboration as barriers to physical activity. The involvement of external societal resources was considered as both a facilitator and a necessity for obtaining physical activity in nursing homes.ConclusionsThis study highlights the need for a consensus in task prioritisation, enhanced competence among healthcare professionals, and better interdisciplinary collaboration to facilitate physical activity in nursing homes. Involving external societal resources could be a strategic approach to address barriers and support physical activity initiatives. Future research should focus on developing effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration that prioritises and promotes physical activity in nursing homes.

Project description:IntroductionExploring the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers toward serious illness conversations based on the Serious Illness Care Program is vital for improving communication with patients who are seriously ill, as has been shown in previous studies. However, few studies have carried out a systematic review to examine common themes, strengthen conclusions and identify gaps in the literature, the findings of which could help steer further research, policies and practice to improve more timely and person-centred conversations about the values and priorities of patients with serious illnesses. The objective of this qualitative meta-synthesis is to explore how healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers described their own experiences of the processes of serious illness communication through a secondary analysis of published qualitative data.Methods and analysisMeta-aggregation will be used to conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies. We conducted an initial search on 10 October 2023; papers published in English will be searched using electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase, Ovid and CINAHL. Studies that satisfy the eligibility criteria will be evaluated for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The meta-aggregative review will consist of the following: (1) extraction of findings of all included studies; (2) categorisation of the findings, with at least two findings per category; and (3) synthesis of one or more findings from at least two categories. Study eligibility screening, data extraction, analysis and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments will be undertaken independently by two authors.Ethics and disseminationSecondary data analysis of published literature does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented in conference papers and elsewhere.Prospero registration numberCRD42022330859.

Dataset Information

Symptom burden and lived experiences of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals on the management of malignant bowel obstruction: A qualitative systematic review.

Background

Aim

Design

Data sources

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Symptom burden and lived experiences of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals on the management of malignant bowel obstruction: A qualitative systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets