Dataset Information

Role of bridging therapy during chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

ABSTRACT: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been approved for use in several relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies and has significantly improved outcomes for these diseases. A number of different CAR T products are now being used in clinical practice and have demonstrated excellent outcomes to those in clinical trials. However, increased real-world use of CAR T therapy has uncovered a number of barriers that can lead to significant delays in treatment. As a result, bridging therapy has become a widely used tool to stabilize or debulk disease between leukapheresis and CAR T cell administration. Here we review the available data regarding bridging therapy, with a focus on patient selection, choice of therapy, timing of therapy, and potential pitfalls.

SUBMITTER: Bhaskar ST

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9175845 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Role of bridging therapy during chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Bhaskar Shakthi T ST Dholaria Bhagirathbhai R BR Sengsayadeth Salyka M SM Savani Bipin N BN Oluwole Olalekan O OO

EJHaem 20211119 Suppl 1

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been approved for use in several relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies and has significantly improved outcomes for these diseases. A number of different CAR T products are now being used in clinical practice and have demonstrated excellent outcomes to those in clinical trials. However, increased real-world use of CAR T therapy has uncovered a number of barriers that can lead to significant delays in treatment. As a result, bridging therap ...[more]

PMID: 35844303

Similar Datasets

Project description:Outcomes for post-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CART) relapse are poor. The utilization of a unique CAR T cell construct for post-CART failure is increasing, but this approach is not well described. In this study, with CART-A the first unique CAR T cell construct received and CART-B the second, the primary objective was to characterize outcomes following CART-B. Secondary objectives included evaluating safety and toxicity with sequential CART infusions; investigating the impact of potential factors, such as antigen modulation and interval therapy, on CART-B response; and characterizing long-term outcomes in patients receiving multiple CARTs. This was a retrospective review (NCT03827343) of children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing CART therapy who received at least 2 unique CART constructs, excluding interim CART reinfusions of the same product. Of 135 patients, 61 (45.1%) received 2 unique CART constructs, including 13 who received >2 CARTs over time. Patients included in this analysis received 14 distinct CARTs targeting CD19 and/or CD22. The median age at CART-A was 12.6 years (range, 3.3 to 30.4 years). The median time from CART-A to CART-B was 302 days (range, 53 to 1183 days). CART-B targeted a different antigen than CART-A in 48 patients (78.7%), owing primarily to loss of CART-A antigen target. The rate of complete remission (CR) was lower with CART-B (65.5%; 40 of 61) than with CART-A (88.5%; 54 of 61; P = .0043); 35 of 40 (87.5%) CART-B responders had CART-B targeting a different antigen than CART-A. Among the 21 patients with a partial response or nonresponse to CART-B, 8 (38.1%) received CART-B with the same antigen target as CART-A. Of 40 patients with CART-B complete response (CR), 29 (72.5%) relapsed. For the 21 patients with evaluable data, the relapse immunophenotype was antigennegative in 3 (14.3%), antigendim in 7 (33.3%), antigenpositive in 10 (47.6%), and lineage switch in 1 (4.8%). The median relapse-free survival following CART-B CR was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1 to 13.2 months), and overall survival was 15.0 months (95% CI, 13.0 to 22.7 months). Given the limited salvage options for post-CART relapse, identifying optimizing strategies for CART-B is critical. We raise awareness about the emerging use of CART for post-CART failure and highlight clinical implications accompanying this paradigm shift.

Project description:Greater tumor burden before CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy predicts lower complete response rate and shorter overall survival (OS) in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Recent patterns of failure studies have identified lesion characteristics, including size, standard uptake value (SUV), and extranodal location, as associated with post-CAR-T therapy failure. Here we analyzed the effect of bridging radiation-containing treatment (BRT) on pre-CAR-T therapy lesion- and patient-level characteristics and post-CAR-T therapy outcomes, including patterns of failure. Consecutive NHL patients who received radiation therapy from 30 days before leukapheresis until CAR T cell infusion were reviewed. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was contoured with a threshold SUV of 4. The first post-CAR-T therapy failures were categorized as preexisting/new/mixed with respect to pre-CAR-T therapy disease and in-field/marginal/distant with respect to BRT. Forty-one patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 33), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 7), or Burkitt lymphoma (n = 1) were identified. BRT significantly improved established high-risk parameters of post-CAR-T therapy progression, including in-field median MTV (45.5 cc to .2 cc; P < .001), maximum SUV (18.1 to 4.4; P < .001), diameter (5.5 cm to 3.2 cm; P < .001), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 312 to 232; P = .025). DLBCL patients with lower LDH levels post-BRT had improved progression-free survival (PFS; P = .001). In DLBCL, first failures were new in 7 of 19 patients, preexisting in 5 of 19, and mixed in 7 of 19; with respect to BRT, 4 of 19 were in-field and 4 of 19 were marginal. Post-CAR-T therapy survival was similar in patients with initially low MTV and those with newly low MTV post-BRT using a statistically determined threshold of 16 cc (PFS, 26 months versus 31 months; OS unreached for both). BRT produced significant cytoreductions in diameter, SUV, MTV, and LDH, all predictors of poor post-CAR-T therapy outcomes. Similar PFS and OS in patients with initially low MTV and those who achieved newly low MTV after BRT suggest that BRT may "convert" poor-risk patients to better risk. In the future, the response to BRT may allow for risk stratification and individualization of bridging strategies.

Dataset Information

Role of bridging therapy during chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Publications

Role of bridging therapy during chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets