Dataset Information

Correction: Park et al. Genetic Study in Korean Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome or Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2013.

ABSTRACT: In the original article [...].

SUBMITTER: Park E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9181158 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Correction: Park et al. Genetic Study in Korean Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome or Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. <i>J. Clin. Med.</i> 2020, <i>9</i>, 2013.

Park Eujin E Lee Chung C Kim Nayoung K D NKD Ahn Yo Han YH Park Young Seo YS Lee Joo Hoon JH Kim Seong Heon SH Cho Min Hyun MH Cho Heeyeon H Yoo Kee Hwan KH Shin Jae Il JI Kang Hee Gyung HG Ha Il-Soo IS Park Woong-Yang WY Cheong Hae Il HI

Journal of clinical medicine 20220527 11

In the original article [...]. ...[more]

PMID: 35683636

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a pattern of kidney injury with diverse causes and pathogeneses, resulting in podocyte injury and depletion. It can be classified as primary, genetic, or secondary. Because FSGS classically has a worse prognosis in patients with nephrotic syndrome, most studies have focused on the treatment and evolution of these patients, resulting in a lack of data related to patients without nephrotic syndrome. The objective of this study was to establish the main etiologies, characteristics, and evolution of renal disease in FSGS patients with nephrotic and non-nephrotic proteinuria. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study that included 140 patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of FSGS in the 2009-2017 period. Patients were separated into those with and those without nephrotic syndrome at diagnosis, and these two groups were compared in terms of the clinical characteristics, histological profile, and outcome. Non-nephrotic patients with unfavorable progression were selected for ultrastructural analysis with electron microscopy. Results: During the study period, 32.9% of the patients with FSGS had non-nephrotic proteinuria at diagnosis. This group had a larger proportion of patients with hypertension and a not otherwise specified FSGS variant on histology. The proportion of patients with secondary forms of FSGS was comparable between the two groups, with HIV infection and systemic lupus erythematosus being predominant. Progression to renal replacement therapy occurred in 31.3% of the patients in the nephrotic group and in 26.8% of those in the non-nephrotic group, with no statistical difference between them. All of the non-nephrotic group patients who progressed to renal replacement therapy were analyzed by electron microscopy, the diagnosis of FSGS was confirmed, and there was the finding of high chronicity in these patients. Conclusions: Among patients with FSGS, those without nephrotic syndrome had a poor renal outcome at a frequency similar to that of those with nephrotic syndrome. Factors related to better renal survival were having had a complete response to treatment in the case of those with nephrotic syndrome and having achieved proteinuria values of less than 1.5 g/day in the case of those without nephrotic syndrome.

Project description:Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a leading cause of kidney disease worldwide. The presumed etiology of primary FSGS is a plasma factor with responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapy and a risk of recurrence after kidney transplant-important disease characteristics. In contrast, adaptive FSGS is associated with excessive nephron workload due to increased body size, reduced nephron capacity, or single glomerular hyperfiltration associated with certain diseases. Additional etiologies are now recognized as drivers of FSGS: high-penetrance genetic FSGS due to mutations in one of nearly 40 genes, virus-associated FSGS, and medication-associated FSGS. Emerging data support the identification of a sixth category: APOL1 risk allele-associated FSGS in individuals with sub-Saharan ancestry. The classification of a particular patient with FSGS relies on integration of findings from clinical history, laboratory testing, kidney biopsy, and in some patients, genetic testing. The kidney biopsy can be helpful, with clues provided by features on light microscopy (e.g, glomerular size, histologic variant of FSGS, microcystic tubular changes, and tubular hypertrophy), immunofluorescence (e.g, to rule out other primary glomerulopathies), and electron microscopy (e.g., extent of podocyte foot process effacement, podocyte microvillous transformation, and tubuloreticular inclusions). A complete assessment of renal histology is important for establishing the parenchymal setting of segmental glomerulosclerosis, distinguishing FSGS associated with one of many other glomerular diseases from the clinical-pathologic syndrome of FSGS. Genetic testing is beneficial in particular clinical settings. Identifying the etiology of FSGS guides selection of therapy and provides prognostic insight. Much progress has been made in our understanding of FSGS, but important outstanding issues remain, including the identity of the plasma factor believed to be responsible for primary FSGS, the value of routine implementation of genetic testing, and the identification of more effective and less toxic therapeutic interventions for FSGS.

Dataset Information

Correction: Park et al. Genetic Study in Korean Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome or Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2013.

Publications

Correction: Park et al. Genetic Study in Korean Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome or Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. <i>J. Clin. Med.</i> 2020, <i>9</i>, 2013.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets