Project description:Robotic technology is positioned to transform the approach to tracheobronchial surgery. With its magnified 3D view, intuitive controls, wristed-instruments, high-fidelity simulation platforms, and the steady implementation of new technical improvement, the robot is well-suited to manage the careful dissection and delicate handling of the airway in tracheobronchial surgery. This innovative technology has the potential to promote the widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques for this complex thoracic surgery.
Project description:Tracheobronchial pathology can be related to trauma, infection, tumor, or a combination of these. Per definition, planning for tracheobronchial surgery can be complicated by the overlap of anesthesiological interests in airway management and the primary surgical field. Therefore, following a detailed description of the stenosis, management of tracheobronchial surgery requires an interdisciplinary discussion and individualized planning of the procedure. There are several options for intraoperative ventilation depending on the exact localization of the defect. Hence, different tubes and ventilation techniques from cross-field ventilation, to jet ventilation, or even spontaneous breathing under regional anesthesia, have to be discussed. Moreover, an innovative ventilation mode called flow-controlled ventilation (FVC) has been developed, which allows to apply standard tidal volumes through a narrow-bore endotracheal tube. In addition, the Ventrain has been developed as an emergency device following the same technique of an active expiration based on the Venturi principle and a controlled gas flow. In critical situations, it allows even ventilation through the working channel of a bronchoscope. Overall, tracheobronchial surgery is performed under total intravenous anesthesia and the aim of an early extubation at the end of surgery. Airway management has to be discussed and planned between surgeon and anesthesiologist. All of the steps of the procedure need constant and clear communication.
Project description:Prevention of bronchial complications after airway surgery must be our primary goal. Understanding bronchial and anastomotic healing is the first step to success. This can be improved by standardizing operating technique (bronchial closure and end-to-end anastomosis) as well as postoperative care. Bronchopleural fistula after pneumonectomy still remains a feared complication with a high mortality rate. Especially after sleeve resection interpretation of endobronchial healing and postoperative measures of care with the help of an algorithm, may avoid anastomotic insufficiency and therefore reduced the secondary pneumonectomy rate.
Project description:BackgroundTracheobronchial stents types, uses, techniques for deployment and extraction have practice variations around the world.MethodsWe collected responses by sending an online survey of 8 questions to world interventional bronchology member societies and social media groups.ResultsThere were 269 respondents from 47 countries. Europe had 97 respondents from 22 countries. There were 8 respondents from Australia, 7 from Africa (3 countries) and 7 from 4 countries in South America (SA). North America (NA) had 72 respondents from 3 countries. Asia had 78 respondents from 14 countries. For stent placements 15% [41] used fiberoptic bronchoscope (FB) only. Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) was solely utilized by 38% [102]. Forty-six percent [123] used a combination of RB and FB (P value <0.00001). For stent extraction 13% [19] used FB alone, 57% [85] used RB, and 36% [54] used a combination of RB and FB (P value <0.00001). Placement of stents were 50.5% [135] only by direct visualization. Twenty-three percent [61] always used fluoroscopic guidance. Twenty-six-point-five percent [71] used fluoroscopy in certain cases (P value <0.00001). Sixty percent [162] decided stent sizing by measurements of stenotic and non-stenotic areas on radiology. Twelve percent [32] respondents used sizing devices. Sixty-five percent [177] used a ruler and bronchoscope to measure stenotic areas. Thirty-eight percent [104] used visual estimation and experience. Seven percent [19] used serial balloon dilatation size. To prevent clogging of stents, 22% [59] prescribed mucolytics. Seventy-three percent [195] nebulized saline, 26% [70] had Mucomyst Nebulization, 24% [65] Nebulized bronchodilators and other methods 11% [30] were advised. Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) 44% was the commonest type of stent used around the world. Silicone stents 37%, Y stents 15%, uncovered SEMS 12%, Montgomery T tube 5% followed. Polyflex stents 3% and custom-made stents 3% were least used. Biodegradable stents were used by 7.5%, and not used by 92.5%.ConclusionsTracheobronchial stent practice norms have slowly evolved, but its practice variations lack uniformity, and have sparse evidence-based studies for its direction.
Project description:BackgroundAirway management in tracheobronchial surgeries, especially carinal resection and reconstruction, remains one of the greatest challenges to thoracic surgeons. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for respiratory support during tracheobronchial surgeries.MethodsThe data of patients who underwent VV-ECMO-assisted tracheobronchial surgeries at the Shanghai Chest Hospital from August 2006 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological, perioperative, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 7 patients (4 males and 3 females) with a median age of 56 years (range, 11-70 years) were included in the study. The following tracheobronchial surgeries were conducted: carinal resection and reconstruction with complete pulmonary parenchyma preservation (n=4), left main bronchus and hemi-carinal sleeve resection (n=1), right upper sleeve lobectomy and hemi-carinal resection (n=1), and tracheal resection and reconstruction (n=1). The mean time on VV-ECMO was 167.7±65.8 min, and the mean operative time was 192.4±55.0 min. The average estimated blood loss was 271.4±125.4 mL. No perioperative death or reimplantation of VV-ECMO occurred. Postoperative complications were observed in 2 patients, including 1 case of respiratory failure due to preoperative severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 1 case of chylothorax. The median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 7-46 days). The median follow-up time was 30 months (range, 21-33 months). All the patients remained alive, and no postoperative readmission occurred during the follow-up period.ConclusionsVV-ECMO is a safe and feasible ventilation mode when intraoperative oxygen saturation cannot be well maintained during tracheobronchial surgery.
Project description:BackgroundIn advanced esophageal carcinoma (EC), there is limited data on risk factors predicting tracheobronchoesophageal fistula (TEF) formation and survival among patients who required airway interventions.MethodsA retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with EC, who had airway involvement requiring intervention, was conducted from 1998 to 2018. Demographics, clinical progress, disease stage, treatment and survival outcomes were recorded. Patients were followed up till death or until completion of the study. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and curves compared by log-rank test. Multivariate analyses of risk factors were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression.ResultsA total of 122 patients were included. The median (IQR) survival from time of airway intervention was 3.30 (1.57-6.88) months, while the median (IQR) survival from time of histological diagnosis was 8.90 (4.91-14.45) months. Tumour location within 20 mm of the carina, prior radiotherapy and/or esophageal stenting were significantly associated with formation of TEF. Mid EC [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-3.2] or presence of TEF (adjusted HR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.0-3.2) were associated with lower survival. Patients receiving chemotherapy (adjusted HR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25-0.84), or esophageal stenting whether before or after airway intervention (adjusted HR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.15-0.68 and adjusted HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.90) were associated with increased survival.ConclusionsFactors associated with TEF formation include airway location, radiotherapy and prior esophageal stenting, and the development of TEF was associated with poorer survival. An algorithmic approach towards tracheobronchial involvement in EC is proposed based on these findings and a review of the literature.
Project description:BackgroundAfter relieving stenosis with an airway silicone stent in post-tuberculosis bronchial stenosis (PTTS), stent removal is attempted if it is determined that airway patency can be maintained even after stent removal. However, the factors affecting airway stent removal are not well known. We investigate the factors that enable the successful removal of airway silicone stents in patients with PTTS.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed PTTS patients who underwent bronchoscopic intervention from January 2004 to December 2019. Successful stent removal is defined as airway patency maintained when the stent is removed, so that reinsertion of the stent is not required. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with successful stent removal at the first attempt.ResultsTotal 344 patients were analyzed. Patients were followed up for a median of 47.9 (26.9-85.2) months after airway stent insertion. Approximately 69% of PTTS patients finally maintained airway patency after the stent was removed. Factors related to successful stent removal at the first attempt were older age and male sex. Absence of parenchymal calcification, segmental consolidation & bronchiolitis, and no trachea involved lesion were relevant to the successful stent removal. Stent dwelling for 12-24 months was associated with successful stent removal compared to a duration of less than 12 months.ConclusionFor patients whose airway patency is determined to be maintained even without a stent, it is necessary to attempt stent removal in consideration of factors related to successful stent removal.