Comparing cross-sectional and longitudinal tracking to establish percentile data and assess performance progression in swimmers.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: To provide percentile curves for short-course swimming events, including 5 swimming strokes, 6 race distances, and both sexes, as well as to compare differences in race times between cross-sectional analysis and longitudinal tracking, a total of 31,645,621 race times of male and female swimmers were analyzed. Two percentile datasets were established from individual swimmers' annual best times and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine differences between cross-sectional analysis and longitudinal tracking. A software-based percentile calculator was provided to extract the exact percentile for a given race time. Longitudinal tracking reduced the number of annual best times that were included in the percentiles by 98.35% to 262,071 and showed faster mean race times (P <
SUBMITTER: Born DP
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9206680 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA